CleanTechnica is the #1 cleantech-focused
website
 in the world. Subscribe today!


Clean Power tennessee senator lamar alexander

Published on February 17th, 2012 | by Stephen Lacey

19

WTF? Sen. Lamar Alexander “Can’t Think of” Extending Wind Power Tax Credits (& Saving 37,000 Jobs), but Trying to Force Tar Sands Pipeline

Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

February 17th, 2012 by  

 
tennessee senator lamar alexanderThis post was originally published on Climate Progress and has been reposted with permission.

With every passing day, Congress outdoes its own abysmal environmental record.

Even as federal policymakers consider a transportation bill that would open up sensitive areas for offshore drilling, encourage use of dirty oil shale, force a decision on the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline, and derail public investments in public transportation, they couldn’t even compromise on a simple short-term tax credit for wind energy.

Wind businesses were calling an extension of the credit an “emergency” due to looming mass layoffs in the industry. But history has proven time and time again, if it’s clean and renewable, it doesn’t force any urgency in Congress.

In recent weeks, there was a strong bi-partisan push to include the production tax credit (PTC) in an upcoming payroll tax cut bill. Unlike drilling tax credits for fossil fuels permanently embedded in the tax code, wind and other renewables only get short-term extensions of the PTC. With an expiration looming at the end of this year, wind companies are already reducing orders and laying off hundreds of people.

The effort to extend the PTC was supported by Republican governors, multi-national corporations, and a strong coalition in Congress. However, with some Congressional radicals threatening to “derail” the bill if the PTC were part of the tax cut package, the extension was not in the final bill, according to North American Windpower — effectively killing one of the only chances to revive this vital tax credit in 2012:

The news dealt a crushing blow to the American Wind Energy Association (AWEA), which had hoped that near-term legislative action connected to extending the payroll tax cut was the best vehicle to quickly pass the PTC extension.

According to AWEA, PTC action is urgent, because once the presidential campaign begins in earnest, the focus will be on campaigning, rather than on legislative matters.

Now that a near-term strategy is severely weakened, the wind industry must look to other ways that a PTC extension could be passed this year, such as in a lame-duck Congress following the November general election.

Even if the wind industry gets an extension at the last minute before it expires at the end of December, companies are still going to suffer. Projects take many years to build, and developers and financiers need clarity on whether or not the tax credit will be available when the project is placed in service. With so much uncertainty this year, they’re likely to shelve earlier-stage projects — cutting back on orders, reducing manufacturing activity, and slowing construction into 2013.

The wind industry estimates that a failure to extend the PTC will result in the loss of 37,000 American jobs. One leading manufacturer, Vestas, said it may need to lay off 1,600 people in the coming months without more policy certainty.

Meanwhile, PTC opponents in Congress continue to push for the Keystone XL pipeline, which will create a maximum of 6,000 jobs, according to the company building the project.

Last December, Tennessee Senator Lamar Alexander and other supporters of Keystone XL in Congress nearly derailed a last-minute extension of the payroll tax cut by attempting to force a Presidential decision on the controversial tar sands pipeline. The payroll extension passed, but the tactic ultimately failed when President Obama turned down TransCanada’s permit, saying the forced decision didn’t allow enough time to properly evaluate the environmental impact of the project.

Senator Alexander indicated that he was prepared to take more hostages during the current debate over the payroll tax cut — this time in order to prevent the wind industry from getting an extension of the PTC. In response to the tax credit proposal put forward by Democrats, Sen. Alexander railed against subsidies to wind companies:

“I cannot think of anything that would derail more rapidly the consensus that is developing about extending the payroll tax cut than to do such a thing.”

Indeed, there’s nothing that could derail progress in the energy sector more rapidly than hypocritical members of Congress taking a firm stance against the business of renewable energy.

Senator Alexander failed to mention that the top five oil companies — all of which enjoy tax credits permanently embedded in the tax code — made a combined $137 billion in profits last year. And he clearly didn’t read the latest poll from Yale that found 70% of Americans opposed providing government support to these mature, highly-profitable companies.

Sen. Lamar Alexander photo via Medill DC

Keep up to date with all the hottest cleantech news by subscribing to our (free) cleantech newsletter, or keep an eye on sector-specific news by getting our (also free) solar energy newsletter, electric vehicle newsletter, or wind energy newsletter.



Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

Tags: , , , , , , , ,


About the Author

is an editor at Greentech Media. Formerly, he was a reporter/blogger for Climate Progress, where he wrote about clean energy policy, technologies, and finance. Before joining CP, he was an editor/producer with RenewableEnergyWorld.com. He received his B.A. in journalism from Franklin Pierce University.



  • DrillMan

    You leftist hippies are adorable. Drill, drill, and drill some more. Stop wasting our tax money on useless (and exorbitantly expensive) wind power. Oil and natural gas all the way.

    • http://cleantechnica.com/ Zachary Shahan

      Fossil fuels have permanent subsidies, and have had subsidies for over a century. Why is it so wrong to put wind on an equal playing field? If you look at full costs (meaning, the costs people pay at the hospital as well), wind is cheaper. Additionally, it drives down the price of electricity for consumers. You may have good intentions, but you need to look up the facts.

    • lukealization

      LOL. What a troll.

      • http://cleantechnica.com/ Zachary Shahan

        Yes, strange pleasure they get out of such a life. (or money, i guess,… in some circumstances)

  • Edward Kerr

    At what temperature does blood boil? Because mine is! This development, though not a surprise in any fashion, is the kind of situation that has led this old man to despair over our failed governmental system. What was designed to be a country of “free” people willing to govern themselves has been stolen and corrupted into a monster that defies description. Morons who can’t possibly have the brains that God gave to a chicken are now ruling the roost. This a$$ ho6e will cripple one of the few technologies that offers hope in solving our energy dilemma at the same time supporting an obsolete fossil industry. Apparently, disrupting the lives of 37,000 families who’s bread winner is working toward a clean renewable non polluting solution in favor of 6000 short term construction jobs that will maintain our march to possible extinction, all because it’s “more profitable” (it’s not really when one considers the environmental and health damages to man and beast alike) is a CRIMINAL ACT and in my mind TREASONOUS. Not only to the citizens of the US but to humanity in general. WE will never get to a better day as long as “leaders-not” like L. Alexander have so much as a finger on the tiller.
    “WTF” is exactly right.
    Thanks for re-posting this important story, Stephen……and may Lamar choke on tar sand.

    Edward Kerr

    • Bob_Wallace

      Time to get working to see that as many seats in the House and Senate return to Democratic control.

      We might not be able to get Democrats elected in backward states like Tennessee (where I grew up), but we can put the bozos in the minority once more and get on with the job of fixing our country.

      Big opportunity coming in November. Either work to change things or doom yourself to regret.

      • http://cleantechnica.com/ Zachary Shahan

        Certainly.

        It seems inevitable that Democrats take back at least some of the control. But I also thought it was impossible for George W. to get elected (twice). So, trying not to be complacent! :D

        • Scott_favor

          After the financial meltdown in Q2, Barry is toast.

    • http://cleantechnica.com/ Zachary Shahan

      ” Morons who can’t possibly have the brains that God gave to a chicken ” -This actually made me laugh out loud… well, chuckle, as the story make my blood boil a bit too.

      “a$$ ho6e ” -this one also made me smile :D

      Humor is needed in such moments. Thanks.

    • Scott_favor

      It’s too bad for the families involved. Unfortunately, the equally treasonous and criminally insane president allows and funds business models that can’t exist without govt intervention. If you study your history book, they tried this in Russia.

      The “morons who can’t possibly have brains” continue to dupe Americans into believing in an energy source that is not self sustainable.

      You know who you are.

      • Bob_Wallace

        Boy, Scott, your post must have set some sort of record for time held up for moderation.

        Bush left office, what over three years ago? And only now your swipe at him is getting posted….

        • Scott_favor

          You can do better than that can’t you Bobby?
          Liberals hate it when I tell them capitalist models are sustainable but govt isn’t.

          Math is a funny thing.

          • http://cleantechnica.com/ Zachary Shahan

            Beyond what Bob has noted, capitalist models include govt regulation. Companies have one core problem without regulation (well, one big one when it comes to working and pricing things right) — they don’t internalize the cost of many health effects of their products. If the government doesn’t step it, their prices are artificially lower than their competitors (and we pay the extra cost in more trips to the hospital, more money spent on medicine, and premature death).

            This is certainly the case in the U.S. energy sector today, as our govt is apparently still incapable of addressing these externalities.

        • Bob_Wallace

          Gosh Scott, can you make an even dumber comment? Go on, give it a try.

          Almost every liberal understands capitalism and why capitalism works. They also understand that unless we regulate capitalism to keep the greedy from grabbing more than a “fair share” we end up with monopolies. We end up in even worse conditions than we’re in now with a very tiny percentage of the population owning most stuff.

          As for your “sustainable but govt isn’t” part – word salad that one might expect from Snowbilly Snookie.

        • Scott_favor

          Bob, how about, this headline “the govt had huge success by intervening in amtrak and the us postal service. Solyndra and dozens of other (now bankrupt) alternate reality energy companies executives are happily plotting their next startup and how they will profit from the buddy Barry. Meanwhile families are struggling because these companies can not exist without govt intervention.

          False hopes based on non sustainable business models. Wind, Solar, Biofuel, Corn ethanol, wave, are NOT capable of survival on their own. They are not profitable therefore they will not attract investment (except for the govt).

          Zachary, the term was intervention, not regulation. Although there is far too much regulation as well. EPA should be dismantled and handled by the individual states (who already take care of this).

          Waste of taxpayer dollars. Get rid of the Education dept as well. More waste.

        • Bob_Wallace

          Scott, I can understand why you might wish to eliminate the Department of Education. Obviously our education system failed you.

          I’ve very sorry that you have not been taught how to write a coherent sentence among other other intellectual problems you demonstrate.

          Best wishes for any remediation you might seek.

          I can see no reason for me continuing to exchange comments with you, I suspect your mind is not yet open to facts and your knowledge base seems corrupted, perhaps from too much Fox.

          I’ll leave you the opportunity to post the last comment. Entertain us with some more word salad….

      • Edward Kerr

        Scott Scott Scott…tsk tsk tsk….you really don’t “get it”, do you? After reading your drivel it becomes all too apparent that you have some misguided (probably from too much Faux News) ideas about what is really at stake in the need to move away from a fossil fuels. It’s also fairly obvious that your knowledge of the facts is, to say the least, somewhat weak. I was most amused when you talk about “government intervention” in the US postal service. The postal service has been a part of the US Government since 1775 and is a constitutional mandate. The problems that the postal service confronts today are multifaceted and, in part, caused by the congress.

        Actually, I agree with you on corn ethanol as it isn’t truly an alternative to oil in it’s present paradigm. However, corn ethanol isn’t anywhere near the heart of the energy problems facing the world today.

        By calling for the continuance of the coal and oil industry’s (as major energy providers) shows just how dimwitted you are. Even if one discounts the massive subsidies that oil and coal get. (far greater than the subsidies that you’re squawking about) and the exigent health and environmental costs, fossil fuels are being depleted to the point where smart people realize the need to transition to alternatives. Sadly you have exposed yourself as someone who isn’t in that group.

        I have no problem with using our fossil resources in applications that don’t require them to be consumed by oxidation. We have an emergent technology called “carbon fiber” which is a far better use of all those precious carbon atoms. Perhaps you have heard about it(?) Yes, Scott, I love carbon. Seeing it being wasted (irrationally now with the alternatives available today) truly breaks my heart.

        So you stick with oil and coal and when the price becomes prohibitive due to market forces (you’ve heard of them I suppose) then come back and explain why alternatives are wrong.

        As to your statement “False hopes based on non sustainable business models. Wind, Solar, Bio-fuel, Corn ethanol, wave, are NOT capable of survival on their own. They are not profitable therefore they will not attract investment (except for the govt).” I can only say that you haven’t keep up with thing as, in spite of the Solyndras of the world, capitalists are investing massive amounts of money into alternatives the world over. Even coal and oil interests see the writing on the wall and many of them are also looking to the changes that the future has in store.

        My admonition to you my friend is to do some reading and thinking (if you’re capable) before you go about opening yourself to the criticism of which you are so deserving.

        Oh, and drillman, your just an idiot!!!

        Ed

        • Scott_favor

          Typical liberal arrogance. You have yours so why should anyone else be allowed to have theirs. Read your response. It’s mostly filled with calling me names. That’s the problem. Hippy liberals go wild when you present them with irrefutable facts.

          What the future has in store? More mindless spending on Solyndras. Just do a google on alternative energy bankruptcy.

          Obama has to go. We simply can’t afford him.

      • Edward Kerr

        Typical liberal arrogance. You have yours so why should anyone else be allowed to have theirs. Read your response. It’s mostly filled with calling me names. That’s the problem. Hippy liberals go wild when you present them with irrefutable facts.

        What the future has in store? More mindless spending on Solyndras. Just do a google on alternative energy bankruptcy.

        Obama has to go. We simply can’t afford him.

        Scott,
        I am moved to answer this response to my comment of 4 days ago.

        First: I am not the “liberal” (which you spew as a epithet) that you might think. Though I am liberal on social issues on political matters I have become a radical (though I am still a registered Republican) as the Republican party has lost it’s way.

        As to calling you names, apparently you missed who I was “calling names”, …..It was and is not YOU. Read it again. All that I did was chide you for being unprepared to offer intelligent comments to this forums arguments.

        Even if I were a Hippy Liberal, you have presented me with absolutely NO “irrefutable facts” but simply with your misunderstanding of the situation that we humans now find ourselves in.

        Agreed Solyndra was a mess but not because of their technology but rather due to mismanagement.

        I am also disappointed in Pres Obama, not because we can’t afford him but for reasons other than his activities on the energy issue.

        With best personal regards….
        Ed

Back to Top ↑