CleanTechnica is the #1 cleantech-focused
website
 in the world. Subscribe today!


Clean Power kyoto-succeeded-eu-renewables-21percent

Published on January 18th, 2012 | by Susan Kraemer

9

First-ever Terawatt-Hours Tally of Renewable Energy Released

Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

January 18th, 2012 by  

Renewable energy generated between 665 and 673 terawatt-hours of electricity in the EU in 2010. With total energy consumption of between 3,115  and 3,175 terawatt-hours, this means that clean energy supplied about 21% of all the EU electricity used in 2010.

In an effective rebuttal to those who constantly pooh-pooh renewable energy capacity as “just nameplate capacity”, the figures were released in terawatt-hours of electricity actually produced and consumed in a year, since power generation is the bottom line for any form of electricity.

This – yet more – evidence of the success of policy that enforces the addition of renewable power in the EU was published in a story by the European Wind Energy Association last week, based on data on renewable energy generation collected over several years.

The EU’s 2004 Renewable Electricity Directive set a target of getting 21% electricity from renewable sources by 2010, and in a sign that Kyoto succeeded, it met the target.

Originally, the target had been set for 20% by 2020, but in 2004, the date was moved closer because it was being so speedily accomplished ahead of time, once begun. Indeed, by 2005, the EU already had 13% renewable energy production.

The report extrapolated that if renewable electricity production in the EU continued to grow at the same rate as it did from 2005 to 2010 it would account for over 36% of electricity produced in 2020 and over 50% in 2030.

(With this data on hand, it is no wonder the EU approached the Durban climate talks at the end of last year with the offer to raise their target to 30% by 2020. They are easily on track to exceed that, even with wriggle room for any growth-slowing recessions.)

The tally shows that if the whole world followed its example, we could beat dangerous climate change. Simply reducing emissions 2% a year gets us to the 80% below 1990 levels by 2050 that underpins climate legislation. And building renewable energy at the pace of the EU will do it – increasing renewable energy reduces carbon emissions.

Despite the hysteria whipped up about last year’s announcement of the EU’s one-time “largest ever in a single year!” 2.4% rise in greenhouse gas emissions – the context of that single year rise has been little-noticed.

But that one year rise came after a much larger 7 % drop in emissions the previous year, so – by adding the two years and dividing by two, to get the average of both years – you find that there was actually a drop in greenhouse gas emissions of 3.5% a year, averaged over both years. That drop is almost twice as fast as is needed.

 

Keep up to date with all the hottest cleantech news by subscribing to our (free) cleantech newsletter, or keep an eye on sector-specific news by getting our (also free) solar energy newsletter, electric vehicle newsletter, or wind energy newsletter.



Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

Tags: , , , ,


About the Author

writes at CleanTechnica, CSP-Today, PV-Insider , SmartGridUpdate, and GreenProphet. She has also been published at Ecoseed, NRDC OnEarth, MatterNetwork, Celsius, EnergyNow, and Scientific American. As a former serial entrepreneur in product design, Susan brings an innovator's perspective on inventing a carbon-constrained civilization: If necessity is the mother of invention, solving climate change is the mother of all necessities! As a lover of history and sci-fi, she enjoys chronicling the strange future we are creating in these interesting times.    Follow Susan on Twitter @dotcommodity.



  • jburt56

    In other words, sustainable scales and we can now beat naysayers to within an inch of their lives.

    • http://cleantechnica.com/ Zachary Shahan

      Exactly! :D

  • http://cleantechnica.com/ Zachary Shahan

    Boom!

    Way to nail it!

    Love the opening:

    Renewable energy generated between 665 and 673 terawatt-hours of electricity in the EU in 2010. With total energy consumption of between 3,115 and 3,175 terawatt-hours, this means that clean energy supplied about 21% of all the EU electricity used in 2010.

    In an effective rebuttal to those who constantly pooh-pooh renewable energy capacity as “just nameplate capacity”, the figures were released in terawatt-hours of electricity actually produced and consumed in a year, since power generation is the bottom line for any form of electricity.

    • http://muckrack.com/dotcommodity Susan Kraemer

      Haha. You are my favorite editor, Zach

  • http://k.lenz.name/LB Karl-Friedrich Lenz

    A couple of small corrections:

    The original Directive was of 2001 (as noted at the article you cited). And Directive 2001/77 of 27 September 2001 originally set an overall target of 22%, which was reduced slightly by the Act on Accession of 10 new Member States in 2003 (search for 12003TN02/12/A to find that) to the 21% target.

    That Directive has been repealed by Directive 2009/22, which has no targets for the electricity sector, but only a 20% target for the share of renewable in gross final energy consumption in its Article 3.

    On a related point, Germany amended Article 1of the law on renewable energy last summer to include legally binding goals of 35% for 2020 and 50% for 2030 (electricity share) as well as 18% for 2020 (gross final energy consumption).

    • http://muckrack.com/dotcommodity Susan Kraemer

      I did leave out that the original was in 200 in the end, they get unreadably dense at a certain point. I like to include enough data so people can quickly get a picture of a general story. That is bad news on the 2009 revision down, and great news for Germany’s revisions up.

      • http://k.lenz.name/LB Karl-Friedrich Lenz

        2009 is not a revision down, since it concerns the share of _gross final energy consumption_ instead of electricity.

        And besides from any quibbling about details, I completely agree that this is a success story. You could power quite a lot of countries completely with 665 TWh a year.

        • http://muckrack.com/dotcommodity Susan Kraemer

          but if it was for a total energy (including fuels) of 20%, it means the electricity share would be less than 21%, right?

          • http://k.lenz.name/LB Karl-Friedrich Lenz

            Not really.

            For example, as I noted Germany needs to get to 35% share of electricity and 18% of final energy consumption by 2020 under the new law.

            A simple way that could be achieved would be to have 36% share of electricity and no renewable in all other energy use, and assume that electricity and other energy are the same amount of energy (reality is different). In that case, renewable electricity provides for 36% of half of the total or 18% of total gross final consumption.

Back to Top ↑