NIMBYism’s Threat to Renewables

October 6th, 2011 by Silvio Marcacci

A recent poll said 63 percent of Americans support renewable energy investment… in theory. But, in practice, Not-In-My-Backyard (NIMBY) opposition to new energy infrastructure prevents about 45 percent of renewable energy proposals from being built across the country, according to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

For instance, the Michigan chapter of the Raging Grannies, a national band of senior citizen environmentalists, wants to see the completion of a wind farm off the shores of Grosse Pointe, MI, right outside Detroit. But local residents are opposing the proposed farm. Sailboat owners claim the turbines create dead air, making it harder to sail. They also say and the turbines will be unsightly.

There is similar opposition to renewable projects all over the country. The permit process for the Cape Wind offshore wind project in Massachusetts took nine years, over the opposition of locals, including the late Sen. Edward Kennedy.

Off the coast of Virginia, the military is opposed to offshore wind, claiming turbines will interfere with their training. And in the Mojave Desert, a rare tortoise protected by the Endangered Species Act has slowed development of a massive solar farm.

Robert Bruninga props up is solar panels in his backyard.

And in Maryland, engineer and inventor Robert Bruninga, wanted to turn his unused boat dock into a solar field to provide electricity for his home. But the state denied his permit because, according to Maryland law, nothing is allowed on a pier unless it’s of aquatic nature.

Bruninga has been appealing to the state for a year and a half to make some sort of ordinance for solar panels on boat piers. Until then, he has to set up his panels on the ground in the back of his house, moving them every month because of the shade from the trees.

Patrick Earle of Takoma Park, MD, a science teacher, wanted to put solar panels on his roof, but needed to remove an old silver maple tree. But the Takoma Park arborist told Earle he would have to replant 23 trees in its place, or pay $4,000 into the city’s tree fund.

Earle learned the trees didn’t have to be planted on his own property and was able to get the city to reduce the number of trees to 15 if he planted bigger ones, so he went around town giving out free trees to his neighbors. Total cost: About $600. And now Earle and his family are proud owners of a rooftop solar array, providing about 75 percent of his home’s electricity needs.

You can watch the full segment by clicking the video below:

Keep up to date with all the hottest cleantech news by subscribing to our (free) cleantech newsletter, or keep an eye on sector-specific news by getting our (also free) solar energy newsletter, electric vehicle newsletter, or wind energy newsletter.

Tags: Chamber of Commerce, Energy Infrastructure, NIMBY, not-in-my-backyard, renewable projects, toyota prius

About the Author

Silvio Marcacci Silvio is Principal at Marcacci Communications, a full-service clean energy and climate policy public relations company based in Oakland, CA.

Pingback: Michigan's Wind Farms: The Sound (of Crickets) and the Fury (of Crackpots) - CleanTechnica
Anonymous

Interesting that the Chamber of Commerce would be talking about NIMBY as if it were a bad thing. The CofC has been acting very right wing, anti-green during the last few years.

Might this mean that they are starting to understand that renewables are going to become very major industries in the US?

Just a few days ago we had the Republican governor of Wyoming pushing the sale of wind energy to states west of them. We’ve recently seen the Republican officials of conservative western states knock down anti-wind farm legislation.

A corner might have been turned.
- Anonymous
  
  I wouldn’t hold my breath on the CofC.
  
  But I think it is a good thing we have a conservative heading up AWEA (Bode) and think she does a lot of work to talk to the Republican side.