New Kind of 40% Efficient Solar Farm Gets $90 Million DOE Loan Guarantee to Cogentrix

The largest High Concentration Photovoltaic (HCPV) project in the world is being funded by the DOE with a $90 million loan guarantee for the Cogentrix Alamosa Solar Generating Project. The first 20 years of the electricity it will generate has already been bought under a PPA (power purchase agreement) by the Public Service Company of Colorado. More than 80 percent of its components will be sourced from the United States.

HCPV is new form of utility-scale solar that has barely been developed, but it has great potential because it has almost twice the efficiency of regular solar PV. Cogentrix HCPV is rated at 40% efficient. By comparison, most coal plants are typically rated at 30% efficiency.

The $90 million in funding represents the tail end of almost $40 billion in loan guarantees, loans, or conditional guarantees by the US Department of Energy (DOE) powered by the Obama administration stimulus Recovery Act.

One famously went bad, $0.5 billion to Solyndra. But the more than 40 DOE loan guarantees have powered up more than 40 utility-scale clean energy projects across the US, including several of the world’s largest solar farms, three geothermal projects, the world’s largest wind farm, and the nation’s first new nuclear power plant in three decades.

US renewable energy on the grid is being doubled to 16 GW as a result, because the DOE loan guarantees have generated the security needed for over $150 billion in private investment funding in US clean energy after the 2008 economic blowout.

At just 30 MW, the Cogentrix project is dwarfed by the more than 24,000 MW of 250 MW to 1,000 MW solar farms now being approved in California, largely due to earlier loan guarantees from the DOE.

Most utility-scale solar is not PV, but CSP (Concentrated Solar Power) which requires water. CSP basically concentrates sun light onto mirrors to make steam, which runs turbines the old fashioned way like gas or coal plants – without sacrificing a livable climate for energy production by burning a fossil fuel.

HCPV will not require water, unlike CSP, because it makes electricity directly in photovoltaic cells, just like regular PV. But this form (HC stands for highly concentrated) of PV so highly concentrates the suns light onto the cells that it is almost twice as efficient at 40%.

What an efficiency rating in solar means is that it just takes less space to make the same power. This means a utility-scale HCPV solar farm that is twice as efficient would take up half the space of a regular solar PV solar farm.

This extremely high efficiency is why it makes sense for the DOE to invest in this first project which will provide electricity to about 6,500 homes and cut the emissions of over 43,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide every year.

Further developments in HCPV could lead to a very clean form of energy production which does not use much space. PV solar is preferable to the various forms of solar thermal in a water constrained future, because it does need water.

The 24,000 MW of utility-scale CSP power plants in California was thanks largely to early seed money and loan guarantees like this one from the DOE. The same early seed money is now jumpstarting an even more efficient form of PV.

Susan Kraemer
(syndicate this article here)

 

About Susan Kraemer

Susan Kraemer writes at CleanTechnica, Earthtechling, and GreenProphet and has been published at Ecoseed, NRDC OnEarth, MatterNetwork, Celsius, EnergyNow and Scientific American.

As a former serial entrepreneur in product design she brings an innovator's perspective on inventing a carbon-constrained civilization: If necessity is the mother of invention: solving climate change is the mother of all necessities! As a lover of history and sci fi, she enjoys chronicling the strange future we are creating in these interesting times. 

Follow Susan @dotcommodity on twitter.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Bruce-Miller/100000952005408 Bruce Miller

    Imagine American! an “oil well” that will never go dry! not ever! this is renewable, or perpetual or even eternal energy ! No Foreign oil country parasites to support, no radiation to poison us, no filthy exhaust, no smoke, no ash, no spills, clean ! For once America wins and wins big ! Next on the agenda: A sustainable lifestyle to match ! The conversion from depleting fossil fuels to safer Solar, Wave, Wind, Hydro, Tidal, Geothermal, Bio-mass, Gobar gas (you Google, You see!) Ocean thermal gradient power, and even safe Thorium fueled LFTR reactor technologies from China ( http://www.theoildrum.com/node/4971 ) All available domestically in America ! Oil breaks $100.00 /bbl this week as Asians bid higher and harder with powerful stable trusted Yuan against the U.S. fiat “Funny Money” due once again for Q 3, 4, 5, even 6, “Easing” by the Fed’s to bail their Bankster friends, and U.S. wages fall. America’s greatest hope realized with this new energy – and no wars to fight to get it, to keep it flowing. Bargain at any price!

  • http://soltesza.wordpress.com/ sola

    40% efficiency is more the 2x the average utility scale projects.

    First Solar is a big utility scale player and their panels are below 15% on average.

    Its more like 2.5 – 3x jump.

  • Anonymous

    The 24,000 MW figure is rather inflated: “BLM has received right-of-way requests … for the development of approximately 34 large solar thermal power plants totaling approximately 24,000 megawatts.”
    The list of approved projects totals 4242.5 MW of solar thermal (plus 1033 MW of gas); of which 2372 MW are in doubt (Blythe, Calico, and Imperial Valley). But at least some of that may be replaced with solar PV.

  • MM

    I know the developer is getting a $90M guarantee for the project, what is teh total cost of this project?

    • Susan Kraemer

      Good question. Was not able to find that figure, either at the DOE, or their site.

    • Anonymous

      I believe loan guarantees are generally for 80% of the project cost, so ~$113M.

  • Anonymous

    Comparing the efficiency of solar and coal is nonsensical.

    Surely a website called CleanTechnica has an editor who knows something about clean technology?

    • Susan Kraemer

      Yeah, I agree. Nevertheless, to a lot of people, that is just what they think when they read solar is X% efficient: they suppose that fossil fuels are 100% efficient, and by comparison solar is less so. So it is a useful comparison.

      I also compare it to most solar PV, that at 40% efficient it is about double the efficiency.