CleanTechnica is the #1 cleantech-focused
website
 in the world. Subscribe today!


Cars fuel economy infographic

Published on April 19th, 2011 | by Zachary Shahan

1

History of Fuel Economy {Infographic} & More

Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

April 19th, 2011 by Zachary Shahan 

The cost of fuel is something on a lot of people’s mind these days. And in these times, I think it’s worth looking back and noticing who pushed for great fuel economy standards in cars, efficient and useful mass transit, bicycle and pedestrian facilities that you can actually use, and the rapid development of electric vehicles. Do you know who’s on your side?

For some fun history of fuel economy in the U.S., here’s a useful infographic:

Created by WellHome Insulation

Of course, more efficient cars only go so far when it comes to cutting our oil addiction and the pain we feel at the pump. 40% of trips in the U.S. are 2 miles or less — completely legitimate, easy distances for bicycling and some for even walking. While 12% of trips are currently made by bike or foot, a lot more could be. One reason they aren’t yet? Bicycling and walking only receive 2% of federal transportation dollars. But even without that funding, bicycling and walking are actually easy and enjoyable transportation modes that more people could be taking advantage of (not only saving thousands and thousands of dollars a year, but also improving their health, having fun, and helping the environment).

Mass transit can cover larger areas for most people and are legitimate, efficient transportation options when funded appropriately as well. And as I show from time to time, riding transit would save the average American nearly $10,000 a year.

And, of course, beyond bicycling, walking, and mass transit, we’ve got electric vehicles, hybrids, and biofuels.

Transportation accounts for 29% of our primary energy consumption in the U.S. No matter what our preference, we need to cut back on our oil consumption in some way (or in multiple ways) — through greater fuel efficiency, bicycling, walking, transit, or non-petroleum-based cars.

Related Story:

Funny Exxon Gas Station Sign, but…

Keep up to date with all the hottest cleantech news by subscribing to our (free) cleantech newsletter, or keep an eye on sector-specific news by getting our (also free) solar energy newsletter, electric vehicle newsletter, or wind energy newsletter.



Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

Tags: , , , , , , ,


About the Author

spends most of his time here on CleanTechnica as the director/chief editor. Otherwise, he's probably enthusiastically fulfilling his duties as the director/editor of Solar Love, EV Obsession, Planetsave, or Bikocity. Zach is recognized globally as a solar energy, electric car, and wind energy expert. If you would like him to speak at a related conference or event, connect with him via social media. You can connect with Zach on any popular social networking site you like. Links to all of his main social media profiles are on ZacharyShahan.com.



  • Osten

    I think there’s something wrong with the 1992 and 2007 comparisons. For the Honda Civic at the top of the list the fuel consumption in 1992 is noted as 42 city and 48 highway and as a comparison the 2007 figures for the Honda Civic are 30 city and 40 highway a significant reduction, a 29% deterioration for city and 17% deterioration for highway and yet the comparison percentage is noted as positive 1.5%. This should state -29% for city and -17% for highway.

Back to Top ↑