History of Fuel Economy {Infographic} & More

The cost of fuel is something on a lot of people’s mind these days. And in these times, I think it’s worth looking back and noticing who pushed for great fuel economy standards in cars, efficient and useful mass transit, bicycle and pedestrian facilities that you can actually use, and the rapid development of electric vehicles. Do you know who’s on your side?

For some fun history of fuel economy in the U.S., here’s a useful infographic:

Created by WellHome Insulation

Of course, more efficient cars only go so far when it comes to cutting our oil addiction and the pain we feel at the pump. 40% of trips in the U.S. are 2 miles or less – completely legitimate, easy distances for bicycling and some for even walking. While 12% of trips are currently made by bike or foot, a lot more could be. One reason they aren’t yet? Bicycling and walking only receive 2% of federal transportation dollars. But even without that funding, bicycling and walking are actually easy and enjoyable transportation modes that more people could be taking advantage of (not only saving thousands and thousands of dollars a year, but also improving their health, having fun, and helping the environment).

Mass transit can cover larger areas for most people and are legitimate, efficient transportation options when funded appropriately as well. And as I show from time to time, riding transit would save the average American nearly $10,000 a year.

And, of course, beyond bicycling, walking, and mass transit, we’ve got electric vehicles, hybrids, and biofuels.

Transportation accounts for 29% of our primary energy consumption in the U.S. No matter what our preference, we need to cut back on our oil consumption in some way (or in multiple ways) — through greater fuel efficiency, bicycling, walking, transit, or non-petroleum-based cars.

Related Story:

Funny Exxon Gas Station Sign, but…

About Zachary Shahan

If you couldn't guess, I spend most of my time on CleanTechnica and Planetsave. I'm the director/editor of both sites and am a little obsessed with them and the topics they cover. I'm also Publishing Services Manager at Important Media, which means that I do everything I can to support other Important Media writers, editors, and directors (as well as the network as a whole) in the good work they are engaged in. You can also find my work on Scientific American, Reuters, Change.org, most of the sites in the Important Media network, & many other places. For more, or to connect, go to: zacharyshahan.com

  • Osten

    I think there’s something wrong with the 1992 and 2007 comparisons. For the Honda Civic at the top of the list the fuel consumption in 1992 is noted as 42 city and 48 highway and as a comparison the 2007 figures for the Honda Civic are 30 city and 40 highway a significant reduction, a 29% deterioration for city and 17% deterioration for highway and yet the comparison percentage is noted as positive 1.5%. This should state -29% for city and -17% for highway.