CleanTechnica is the #1 cleantech-focused
website
 in the world.


Boats triple-e

Published on March 4th, 2011 | by Susan Kraemer

6

Danish Maersk Lines Cuts Shipping Emissions 50%

Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

March 4th, 2011 by
 

Shipping is going to need to use a lot less fuel if we still want to have international shipping in the carbon-constrained future that awaits. Even if polluters prevail and no climate laws get passed, world peak oil is lurking in our very near future, anyway.

So a smart company is looking now at a low carbon option in order to keep on shipping sustainably now that fossil fuel use must go down. Denmark’s Mærsk Line, which is the biggest container shipping company in the world is one company that is prepared.

Like so many companies in the carbon-constrained EU under cap and trade requirements (for example, the EU paper industry has cut emissions 47%), it has already reduced its greenhouse gas intensity by 13%, meeting its 2012 goal ahead of time with typical Danish dispatch.

The shipping giant has just signed a contract with South Korea’s Daewoo to buy ten of Daewoo’s Triple E  (Economy of scale, Energy efficient and Environmentally improved) container ships, for delivery between 2013 and 2015, with an option to add 20 more to the order.

The vessels cut shipping emissions by up to 50% per container.

Each costs US$190 million. At four-hundred meters long, 59 meters wide and 73 meters high,the Triple E  is the worlds largest and most efficient vessel.

The Triple E cuts fuel use by 35%.  Several innovations contribute to the efficiency. It is bigger, and slower, and uses propellers with fewer, larger blades.

The increased size alone adds efficiency, reducing the emissions on a per container basis.

Two ‘ultra-long stroke’ engines turn one propeller each (instead of one engine turning two smaller propellers) and each propeller is larger, with fewer (4 instead of 6) and longer blades (9.8 instead of 9.6 meters long) and combined with a sleeker hull design, reduce energy use 4%. (Full details at Green Car Congress)

The top speed will be capped at 23 knots, so that each container shipped uses less CO2, so it travels slower,  To power that speed takes just between 65-70 MW – compared to 80 MW for the Emma Maersk. Even though the speed reduction is minor, by just two knots, this reduces emissions 19%.

Waste heat recovery is used to reduce CO2 emissions another 9%. When exhaust gas leaves the engine, it is extremely hot. The Triple E can capture the heat and use it to make steam in an exhaust gas boiler, to supply a turbine to generate electricity.

These will be ten ships that will be welcome in the Port of Los Angeles!

Susan Kraemer@Twitter

Keep up to date with all the hottest cleantech news by subscribing to our (free) cleantech newsletter, or keep an eye on sector-specific news by getting our (also free) solar energy newsletter, electric vehicle newsletter, or wind energy newsletter.

Print Friendly

Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone


About the Author

writes at CleanTechnica, CSP-Today, PV-Insider , SmartGridUpdate, and GreenProphet. She has also been published at Ecoseed, NRDC OnEarth, MatterNetwork, Celsius, EnergyNow, and Scientific American. As a former serial entrepreneur in product design, Susan brings an innovator's perspective on inventing a carbon-constrained civilization: If necessity is the mother of invention, solving climate change is the mother of all necessities! As a lover of history and sci-fi, she enjoys chronicling the strange future we are creating in these interesting times.    Follow Susan on Twitter @dotcommodity.



  • Eletruk

    Sometimes I wonder about the math of the claimed savings. For instance, if the ship slows from 25 knots to 23 knots, that means the ship takes 8.6% longer to get there. So the fuel savings of 19% may not be all that great when it takes another day or two burning fuel.

  • Pingback: EU Met 2012 Goals, on Track for 2020, Can Cut Emissions 80% by 2050 – CleanTechnica: Cleantech innovation news and views

  • walther

    To bad they are intented for the route between Asia and Europa.
    see http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5012/5465289218_29c9ec7487_z.jpg

  • http://green-and-energy.com Thomas – Electric Car

    What about the ships with the big kites, which drag them over the oceans with hardly no motor power?

    • http://cleantechnica.com/author/susan Susan Kraemer

      A bird in the hand… since Maersk is the biggest container shipping company in the world – so for it to order actual ships from an actual shipping manufacturer for an actual date will cut more emissions than a start-up with a prototype to test (only if he can raise some money) will, in our immediate future. (Not that we don’t need innovation too!)

    • miro novak

      Thomas, to compensate 70 MW of propeler’s power, you need (with 10 m/s speed blowing wind) the area of kite of 126 000 m2. It is incredible area. The Kite system is not a good way. I have more interesting one. And an energy storage as I wrote before.

      Miro Novak
      macmiro@me.com

Back to Top ↑