CleanTechnica is the #1 cleantech-focused
website
 in the world. Subscribe today!


Clean Transport us secretary of transportation lahood

Published on December 27th, 2010 | by Zachary Shahan

4

U.S. Secretary of Transportation Focusing on High-Speed Rail in Florida

Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

December 27th, 2010 by Zachary Shahan 

With Wisconsin and Ohio forfeiting their high-speed rail funding and Florida getting awarded a decent amount more ($342.3 million) for its proposed high-speed rail network, you would think all is going smoothly with regards to this matter in the highly-congested Sunshine State.

However, in addition to John Kasich of Ohio and Scott Walker of Wisconsin, incoming Florida Governor Rick Scott is the other newly-elected Republican who has had a hard time identifying the clear economic benefits of one of the world’s key transportation options of the future (and of the present in many countries, like China).

Scott’s High-Speed Rail Hesitations

“Regrettably, Mr. Scott’s sending signals that to him, politics may well be more important than doing what’s clearly in the best interests of Florida. How unfortunate for the state, which needs the stimulative, potentially transformative high-speed line,” the Orlando Sentinel reports. “And how ironic for someone who cast himself as a political outsider in his run for governor.”

Secretary LaHood Drops Florida a Note

Basically, in response to Scott’s hesitations, U.S. secretary of transportation Ray LaHood wrote a guest article on high-speed rail in the Orlando Sentinel last week. [Correction via Olivia Alair, Press Secretary for the U.S. Department of Transportation: “Secretary LaHood wrote the oped in the Orlando Sentinel because Florida is poised to benefit from one of the first major high-speed rail corridors in the U.S.,” not in response to Scott’s hesitations.]

LaHood makes it clear as day why a large and connected high-speed network is important for the U.S. Throughout the piece, he compares a national high-speed rail network to the interstate highway system. You would think everyone could come to the easy realization that the interstate required considerable initial investment but was worth that investment in the long term and that a potential national high-speed rail network is in the same position today. Of course, leaving Kasich, Walker (and, perhaps, Scott) aside, many state leaders get this.

Since the president proposed his vision for high-speed rail last year, enthusiasm around the country has been overwhelming,” LaHood writes. “To date, states have submitted applications for $64 billion — more than six times the amount of money available.”

Here’s a little more from LaHood on why it’s important for the U.S. to invest in high-speed rail:

For years, we have watched other countries pass us by as they build faster trains. Indeed, the benefits of high-speed rail are tough to ignore. It will seamlessly integrate large metropolitan communities and economies through a safe, convenient and reliable transportation alternative. It will ease congestion on our roads and at our airports. It will reduce our reliance on oil as well as our carbon emissions. And it will provide a much-needed boost to America’s hard-hit manufacturing sector during a time of economic struggle….

last fall, 30 foreign and domestic rail manufacturers committed to employing American workers and locating or expanding their base of operations in the U.S. if selected for high-speed-rail contracts. And the administration’s 100 percent Buy America requirement is sure to generate a powerful ripple effect as manufacturers buy supplies and as workers earn and spend their paychecks….

By staying on track with President Obama’s vision, modern, high-speed passenger service could connect 80 percent of Americans and restore the United States’ economic competitiveness….

Like our parents and grandparents, we, too, must exercise the foresight and courage to invest in the most important infrastructure projects of our time. If we work together, a national high-speed-rail network can and will be our generation’s legacy.

Check out LaHood’s full piece here: High-speed-rail will be our generation’s legacy

Photo Credit: WSDOT

Keep up to date with all the hottest cleantech news by subscribing to our (free) cleantech newsletter, or keep an eye on sector-specific news by getting our (also free) solar energy newsletter, electric vehicle newsletter, or wind energy newsletter.



Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

Tags: , , , , ,


About the Author

spends most of his time here on CleanTechnica as the director/chief editor. Otherwise, he's probably enthusiastically fulfilling his duties as the director/editor of Solar Love, EV Obsession, Planetsave, or Bikocity. Zach is recognized globally as a solar energy, electric car, and wind energy expert. If you would like him to speak at a related conference or event, connect with him via social media. You can connect with Zach on any popular social networking site you like. Links to all of his main social media profiles are on ZacharyShahan.com.



  • Pingback: High-Speed Rail Could Get $53 Billion More from Obama Administration [VIDEO] – CleanTechnica: Cleantech innovation news and views

  • fred smith

    why not a high speed subway instead… initial cost will appear higher, but in reality the costs will be lower, purchasing land will be non-existant, the distance traveled will shrink, the gradient will cease to matter, maintenance costs will be greatly reduced, instead of walking up to a farmer, for instance and telling him that you need a few acres of his land, for a loud train to pass through, you instead ask for permission for a ventillation shaft, and a bank of solar panels to provide power for the vntalation system. If we desire to transport good quickly, the first directive is the shortest route, if we desire to reduce enviornment impact then underground, and electrically powered make sense (no seasonally cutting back trees, etc). ty

  • Paul B

    All the Florida funds should go to California if Rick Scott bows to pressure from the Know-nothing Tea Party Zealots. California has always been the most willing state to pioneer “new” technology, even though its been around in other countries for forty odd years. This extra 3 Billion will complete the central valley backbone and maybe allow the release of another 3 million in matching funds. America only needs one demo line, if Florida can’t step up to the plate, California will.

    • http://www.zacharyshahan.com Zachary Shahan

      i support your wish :D

      i agree

      although, i think Florida will go forward with their plans

Back to Top ↑