CleanTechnica is the #1 cleantech-focused
website
 in the world. Subscribe today!


Clean Power nuclear reactor

Published on June 24th, 2010 | by Zachary Shahan

2

Did the Nuclear Industry and Politicians Learn Anything from the BP Oil Spill?

Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

June 24th, 2010 by Zachary Shahan
 

nuclear reactor

[social_buttons]

A major factor causing the BP oil spill to be the disaster that it is turning out to be is deregulation of the oil industry. You would think that if people, especially politicians, learned one thing from this disaster, it would be that we need strong government oversight of risky technologies.

It seems right now that some in the nuclear industry and Congress have missed that completely or just haven’t heard the news about the BP oil spill at all.

Certain nuclear energy supporters are trying to weaken regulation of new nuclear reactors in any proposed climate and energy or energy-only legislation.

“Even as tens of thousands of gallons of oil continue to erupt each day from BP’s botched oil well, federal lawmakers are weighing legislation that includes BP-style deregulation of new nuclear reactors, which are the only energy source where the damage from a major accident would dwarf the harm done by a ruptured offshore oil well,” experts from The Physicians for Social Responsibility (PSR) Safe Energy program wrote yesterday.

PSR has listed four provisions that are part of the proposed American Power Act that could set us up for a nuclear-style BP oil spill.

These are: Section 1108 – “Undermining NRC Safety Review Before Reactor Startup”; Section 1109 – “Gutting Environmental Analysis in New Reactor Licensing”; Section 1101 – “Pressuring the NRC to Further Truncate Reactor Licensing”; Section 1105 – “Eliminating Independent Safety/Environmental Review of New Reactors by NRC Judges”.

You can find more on them on these via the link above.

More commentary on this matter is available there as well, but here are two extended quotes that completely nail the issue, in my opinion.

Peter Bradford, former commissioner of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and former chair of both the New York and Maine state utility regulatory commissions, says:

It is both astonishing and shameful that – when evidence of the consequences of lax regulation and lax oversight washes ashore on tides of oil in the Gulf states and tides of red ink in housing and financial markets – Congress would consider cutting regulatory corners for new nuclear power. Regulatory delays are not causing nuclear power’s problems today. Instead, investors and lenders will not provide capital because of the high risks of reactor cancellation, cost overruns, and cheaper energy alternatives. Putting deregulation provisions for nuclear power in any climate/energy legislation will not save significant licensing time, but it will send the Nuclear Regulatory Commission exactly the wrong message from Congress – speed over safety. Congress will be flat lining effective regulation, not streamlining it.

Diane Curran, Esq., partner, Harmon, Curran, Spielberg & Eisenberg, LLP, says:

The parallel here to the Gulf oil permitting is the proposed short-circuiting of legal processes that are designed to identify and address risks ahead of time. Proposed legislation would, for example, eliminate the independent review now conducted by NRC judges on uncontested issues and would make it easier for the government to avoid consideration of less dangerous alternatives to reactors. The BP spill provides an object lesson regarding the risks of eliminating legal processes for rigorous government oversight of safety and environmental risks because BP was allowed to start drilling without conducting the type of rigorous environmental analysis that is normally required by federal law. In the case of new reactors, the NRC has already seriously weakened key aspects of the legal processes for reactor review. Climate/energy legislation must not make matters even worse.

Nuclear power is a risky technology, and we need good government oversight of this technology. The last thing we need is a nuclear disaster in the United States.

Like this article? Connect with me on Facebook or Twitter

Image Credit: thebmag via flickr/CC license

Keep up to date with all the hottest cleantech news by subscribing to our (free) cleantech newsletter, or keep an eye on sector-specific news by getting our (also free) solar energy newsletter, electric vehicle newsletter, or wind energy newsletter.

Print Friendly

Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

Tags: , , ,


About the Author

spends most of his time here on CleanTechnica as the director/chief editor. Otherwise, he's probably enthusiastically fulfilling his duties as the director/editor of Solar Love, EV Obsession, Planetsave, or Bikocity. Zach is recognized globally as a solar energy, electric car, and wind energy expert. If you would like him to speak at a related conference or event, connect with him via social media. You can connect with Zach on any popular social networking site you like. Links to all of his main social media profiles are on ZacharyShahan.com.



  • http://tenc.net Jared Israel

    Another question is: has PSR learned anything from the oil NOT spill, but gusher? (The term “spill,” used by media and politicians, is manifestly a palliative.) The key point about the present situation is that the Obama administration has put the criminals — and if you have any doubt that BP managers are high class racketeers, watch the CSB video on the Texas City refinery disaster, and the text of the Waxman hearings on BP, linked at tenc.net — Obama has put the criminals in charge of the crime scene where a) BP has prevented a desperately needed, disinterested scientific evaluation of all facts, and consequent choice of least disastrous responses, instead b) doing what it always does: sacrificing people and the environment to protect BP managers’ wealth and keep them out of jail. Hence, for example, the massive spraying of Corexit, so obviously terrible for people and the Gulf, to minmize the apprent oil and BP liabilities. What else they are doing in their interests against everyone else’s, we can only guess. But those who SHOULD be furiously denouncing Obama’s insistence on keeping BP in charge, justified by the lie that this is required under the Oil Pollution and Clean Water acts, which in fact give BP ZERO rights — those who SHOULD be screaming to the skies in this terribly dangerous situation are making little squeeks, and you guys among them. Why? Because of fear of offending your wannabe-ally, Obama? Let me say, without hyperbole: for organized and supposedly progressive scientists to be silent about Obama’s monstrous treachery makes them his accomplices.

  • http://www.rockthereactors.com Rock The Reactors

    We’re hosting a rally to shut down the aging Indian Point nuclear power plant at the Hiro Ballroom in Manhattan on Bastille Day, July 14. You can find detailed information off our website.

Back to Top ↑