$550 Billion in Fossil Fuel Subsidies





Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!

 
Global fossil fuel subsidies equal $550 billion

A new report out by the International Energy Agency (IEA) makes it clear that if we just stopped subsidizing the fossil fuel industry (or, at least, subsidized it a lot less) we could significantly cut climate change pollution.


 
The report found that the global fossil fuel industry receives approximately $550 billion in subsidies every year. The report was released at a meeting of G20 finance ministers in Busan, South Korea last weekend.

You would think that with increasing concerns about global warming and peak oil, subsidies would be decreasing, but the report showed that subsidies rose from $342 billion in 2007 to $557 billion in 2008.

Of course, these skew the energy market, and not in the way that we should to account for the environmental and health externalities of fossil fuels.

Obama’s Proposal to Start Phasing Out Fossil Fuel Subsidies

At the last G20 meeting in Pittsburgh, President Obama put forward the idea of phasing out fossil fuel subsidies, which garnered a considerable amount of support.

This report comes just prior to the next meeting of G20 leaders in Canada on June 26-27 where the issue is expected to be discussed further.

Hopefully, it will help to keep these key decision-makers from avoiding this topic any further.

Iran Leading the World in Fossil Fuel Subsidies

Iran led the pack with $101 billion in fossil fuel subsidies in 2008, accounting for approximately a third of the country’s budget.

“Chronic under-pricing of domestic energy in Iran has resulted in enormous subsidies and a major burden on the economy that is forcing reliance on imports of refined products,” the study concluded. “Steep economic, political and social hurdles will need to be overcome if Iran is to realise lasting reform.”

Energy Consumption and CO2 Emissions Would Drop Considerably if Subsidies Were Cut

The results of cutting fossil fuel subsidies, even slowly, would be considerable.

“The IEA predicted that phasing out subsidies over the next 10 years would lead to a 5.8 per cent cut in global energy demand – equivalent to the combined energy consumption of Japan, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand,” Andrew Donoghue of Business Green reports. “Global CO2 emissions would also be cut by about 6.9 per cent by 2020 if subsidies were withdrawn,” equal to the combined emissions of France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK.

More information on fossil fuel subsidies will be published in a November IEA report, The World Energy Outlook 2010. Additionally, the IEA intends to “create an online database to improve transparency around fossil fuel subsidies, which will include breakdowns by country, by fuel and by year.”

Like this article? Connect with me on Facebook or Twitter, or other social media sites.

Image Credit: melancholic optimist via flickr/CC license



Chip in a few dollars a month to help support independent cleantech coverage that helps to accelerate the cleantech revolution!
Have a tip for CleanTechnica? Want to advertise? Want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.
Sign up for our daily newsletter for 15 new cleantech stories a day. Or sign up for our weekly one if daily is too frequent.
Advertisement
 
CleanTechnica uses affiliate links. See our policy here.

CleanTechnica's Comment Policy


Zachary Shahan

Zach is tryin' to help society help itself one word at a time. He spends most of his time here on CleanTechnica as its director, chief editor, and CEO. Zach is recognized globally as an electric vehicle, solar energy, and energy storage expert. He has presented about cleantech at conferences in India, the UAE, Ukraine, Poland, Germany, the Netherlands, the USA, Canada, and Curaçao. Zach has long-term investments in Tesla [TSLA], NIO [NIO], Xpeng [XPEV], Ford [F], ChargePoint [CHPT], Amazon [AMZN], Piedmont Lithium [PLL], Lithium Americas [LAC], Albemarle Corporation [ALB], Nouveau Monde Graphite [NMGRF], Talon Metals [TLOFF], Arclight Clean Transition Corp [ACTC], and Starbucks [SBUX]. But he does not offer (explicitly or implicitly) investment advice of any sort.

Zachary Shahan has 7870 posts and counting. See all posts by Zachary Shahan