Published on May 3rd, 2010 | by Susan Kraemer4
Is BP's Spill Like The '69 Santa Barbara Spill?
May 3rd, 2010 by Susan Kraemer
The BP/Haliburton oil spill disaster is front page news in the sorts of newspapers that never mention an even larger environmental disaster: climate change.
Because they don’t; it’s hard to get clean energy legislation passed – because most people don’t give a damn. At least compared to the fossil industry. Their whole raison d’etre is at stake. They care. Most people don’t realize the threat of climate change. Their newspapers never mention it. And there are only two constituencies in energy legislation; most people, and the fossil industry (represented by Senate Republicans).
Since only the richest, most powerful industry in the world cares deeply about the topic – it’s always been “the people” side that has to give. So usually Democrats don’t have hissy fits over not getting their way on every little provision sweetening tough environmental legislation. They try to give a little and compromise for the greater good of passing legislation that reduces overall emissions, even if it means there’s also dirty energy in legislation supposedly to clean our energy supply.
However, the BP/Haliburton oil spill has brought one of the dangers of fossil fuel dependence home to even the non-environmental American consciousness of most people. The leak from the bottom of the sea is front page news around the country. Now most people are awake to the dangers of drilling for oil under the sea floor – at depths that humans can’t reach.
This moment may be like the Santa Barbara oil spill in 1969 – because most people got alarmed, that ended California off-shore drilling.
Even people who only watch American Idol now know – there’s an oil spill and it’s bad. You probably know someone like that. They never contact the Senate about clean energy legislation.
Most people never give a moments thought to the far greater devastation that climate change is bringing our civilization. Even as their homes drown or droughts raise farm unemployment to 40%, the largely fossil-fueled media will continue to ensure that most people never do connect the dots.
But this is different. The corporate media is not hiding this news.
Soon most people will see that the Louisiana shrimps and oysters they loved at CostCo won’t be there any more, maybe even for the next ten or twenty years. The Exxon Valdez spill in Prince William Sound still poisons wildlife 20 years later, but there was a comparatively low $300 million in harm done to the fishing industry in Prince William Sound, and $31 million loss to tourism.
Before the spill, ten Democrats from coastal states stood firm against compromising with Republicans on off-shore oil drilling. Then, that seemed quixotic, as without Democrats, there’s no chance of a climate bill.
That position, formerly far out-on-a-limb, is now greatly strengthened by this accident. This disaster provides a huge opportunity to actually get clean energy legislation that cleans our energy supply. Because only when most people care about something, does policy change.
But most people don’t know who to tell. The Senate switchboard is (202) 224 3121.
Keep up to date with all the hottest cleantech news by subscribing to our (free) cleantech newsletter, or keep an eye on sector-specific news by getting our (also free) solar energy newsletter, electric vehicle newsletter, or wind energy newsletter.
Haven’t taken our 2016 reader survey yet? Do so now!