“Thermos Bottle” Technology Delivers Solar Hot Water in Cold Weather
A lunch box staple is the core idea behind solar technology that could bring cost effective solar-heated hot water to cold climates. Solar Panels Plus has come up with a solar hot water heater based on evacuated tubes similar to those popularized by Thermos. Last year two of the company’s models were certified as eligible for Canada’s ecoENERGY for Renewable Heat program, but the real test will occur in southeastern Idaho, where Solar Panels Plus has installed a solar hot water system at the Homestead Family Restaurant in Blackfoot.
If the installation keeps the solar hot water coming in cold weather, it’s another big step forward for the ability of solar energy to compete with fossil fuels. Restaurants are hot water gobblers, and a low cost solar installation that works in cold weather would have a relatively short payback for high volume users — especially if it receives solar energy incentives from its utility, as was the case here.
>> Interested in solar power? See if group discounts are available in your city
Solar Panels Plus and Thermos-style Solar Energy
Like a Thermos bottle, Solar Panels Plus uses double-walled glass tubes to retain and concentrate heat, helped along by an optical coating. The tubes passively track the sun due to their curved shape, which helps boost efficiency. The five SPP-30 model solar collectors installed at Homestead each contain 30 of the tubes and the owner estimates a savings of $500 monthly on electricity bills for the 130-seat restaurant. Though the solar collectors operate effectively under cloudy, cold or even freezing conditions, the company recommends that for maximum reliability and return on investment, the system should be used to marginalize the use of conventional fuels rather than replacing them completely.
Utilities, Incentives, and Clean Energy Champions
The Homestead system was installed under an incentive program offered by the local utility, Idaho Power Company. It was the first commercial installation under the utility’s clean energy program and according to a recent press release it illustrates, “a commitment to energy efficiency and sustainability – something we champion.” Well, join the party. Utilities are emerging as the knights in shining armor of the clean energy scene by promoting clean energy innovation and pushing for small scale, on site installations. A recent survey revealed that most utility companies believe that by 2050 small scale clean energy will become an important part of the national grid, and within that group 13% believe that the small scale clean energy “electranet” will actually surpass conventional centralized generation.
Nuclear Power and the Clean Energy Future
The clean energy juggernaut keeps rolling along, picking up investment power and the support of corporate giants including utility companies. Even the nation’s top sports industries are on board the sustainability train, including golf, the ski industry, Major League Baseball and the National Football League. If this keeps up the future doesn’t look good for the promotion of nuclear power as called for by the Obama administration’s current energy package. The fact is that nuclear energy is neither clean nor sustainable, it is simply expedient. It is rapidly becoming obsolete as a fuel for electrical generation, and if the utility industry survey cited above is any indication, its large scale centralized model is out of place in the electrical grid of the future.
Image: Thermos type bottles by dichohecho on flickr.com.






February 28th, 2010 at 9:16 am
This story seems to imply that this technology is new, or that this company invented it, both of which could not be further from the truth.
February 28th, 2010 at 11:15 am
————-”The fact is that nuclear energy is neither clean nor sustainable, it is simply expedient.”———-
No, this is not a fact, it is a political posture. Not only does nuclear energy have a superlative safety record, better than the record for any renewable-energy source, it is the only non-polluting energy source that can supply electricity on demand when the wind isn’t blowing and the sun isn’t shining.
For real facts, please look at http://gwperplexed.niof.org/thecase.htm
Thanks for allowing comments on your comments.
Red
February 28th, 2010 at 12:41 pm
You obviously don’t live next to a uranium mine.
February 28th, 2010 at 10:42 pm
Evacuated solar tubes are shipping out of China by the boat load… not exactly new technology.
March 1st, 2010 at 8:35 pm
”The fact is that nuclear energy is neither clean nor sustainable, it is simply expedient.”
But it is a baseload technology, which we absolutely need immediately and contributes huge amounts of emissions, which on a LCA would have lower emissions/KWh than coal, gas, and hydro.
March 3rd, 2010 at 3:13 pm
Usually I just skim through these blogs and only read ones that -jump- out at me and yours did. Thanks for it – it is actually a real good read! Do you have a subcribe area so I can link to it to read again another day? Let me know – thanks.
Peter
March 4th, 2010 at 3:45 am
Hi, that’s a good question, I believe there’s an rss but I’m not sure how to use it.
March 6th, 2010 at 1:39 pm
> Kevin A Says:
February 28th, 2010 at 9:16 am
This story seems to imply that this technology is new, or that this company invented it, both of which could not be further from the truth.
Kevin it doesn’t say that this company invented it or that it is new – but curiously, the owner, Mr. Koochekzadeh, does seems to have invented it while at his prior company. I found this info at http://www.solarpanelsplus.com/SPP-history/ it appears that their CEO’s former company did in fact invent the technology, in 1979. Interesting, and like you said, there are many companies using this technology today.
March 8th, 2010 at 3:08 pm
I worked on uranium exploration in the early 80’s so I’m not opposed to nuclear, but it seems to me that we could also use intermittent sources (wind/solar) to produce hydrogen and use that for baseload power. (The power plants that run on natural gas now could probably also burn hydrogen.) There aren’t many areas where the sun doesn’t shine or the wind doesn’t blow.
March 10th, 2010 at 11:24 am
Interesting technology. Do you know what is the output on these systems?