CleanTechnica is the #1 cleantech-focused
website
 in the world. Subscribe today!


Clean Power CCPP

Published on February 10th, 2010 | by Mridul Chadha

7

ADB Approves $135 million Loan For Cleaner Coal-fired Power Plant In China

Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

February 10th, 2010 by  

Asian Development Bank has approved a loan of $135 million to facilitate the construction of an Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle power plant. Although the power plant will be using coal as the primary fuel it air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions from the plant will be lower than the conventional coal-fired power plants.

[social_buttons]

An Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle power plant converts coal into gas through the process of gasification. Once the coal has been converted in synthetic natural gas or syngas, the resulting mixture of gases, mainly comprising of hydrogen and carbon monoxide, is filtered to remove particulate matter. The filtered gas is then ignited using highly compressed air. The flue gases resulting from the combustion of the gas mixture is fed into a gas turbine which is connected to a generator which produced electricity.

The IGCC power plants are efficient because they use the exhaust gases from the gas turbine to convert water into steam through an Heat Recovery Steam Generator which principally works as a heat exchanger that utilizes the heat content of the exhaust gases coming from the gas turbine. The steam thus produced is then fed into a steam turbine which also produces electricity through another generator.

The efficiency of such power plants is higher than the conventional gas-fired or coal-fired power plants as they utilize the energy content of the exhaust gases from the gas turbine. Conventional coal-fired power plants burn the coal directly to generate steam and release the exhaust gases into the atmosphere without extracting any work. These power plants have high thermal efficiency and produce lesser amounts of sulfur dioxide and carbon dioxide emissions, in addition the exhaust gases are also free from particulate matter which are captured during filtration.

The average efficiency of coal-fired power plants in China is around 33.2% (IEA: Focus on Clean Coal Report, 2006) but the thermal efficiency of combined cycle power plants is usually 40% and can be increased if the temperature of the flue gases fed into the gas turbine is increased.

Such power plants could prove to be bridges between the carbon-intensive conventional coal-fired power plants and the renewable energy based power plants. Developing countries like China and India which are highly dependent on coal for power generation can use these power plants to boost their economic growth an providing low cost power to the poor while limiting the amounts of greenhouse gas emissions.

The problem, though, with such plants is the high capital cost. The per unit cost of generation as compared to coal-fired power plants is higher in case of IGCC power plants. But still, as the ADB notes, they are the cheapest way of reducing carbon emissions as compared to other even more expensive and untested technologies. The cost of generation is expected to match that of conventional power plants as governments around the world launch cap and trade schemes.

Even more efficient, cheaper and cleaner power plants are the ones using Combined Cycle Gas Turbine. In such power plants, natural gas is directly used as the fuel thus eliminating energy requirement for gasification and filtration. China has substantial gas reserves with new and larger finds being reported frequently – CNOOC found three underwater gas fields in the South China Sea, one of which has been verified to have reserves of 100-150 billion cubic meters.

Using combined cycle based power plants developing countries can not only avoid immediate transition to expensive and less efficient renewable energy based technologies but can also reduce their carbon outputs. Both India and China have announced targets for reducing carbon intensities (carbon output per unit GDP).

As the developing countries look to set up more of such power plants the trend could potentially result in increase in production of equipment required and reduction in capital costs. Additionally, these power plants would gradually become more popular as carbon offsetting and trading schemes kick in.

Developed countries, especially those which are against setting up of coal-fired power plants in the developed countries, must support such power plants through financing and technical assistance.

Via: People’s Daily Online

Image Credit: wallyg (Under Creative Commons License)

The views presented in the above article are author’s personal views and do not represent those of TERI/TERI University where the author is currently pursuing a Master’s degree.

Keep up to date with all the hottest cleantech news by subscribing to our (free) cleantech newsletter, or keep an eye on sector-specific news by getting our (also free) solar energy newsletter, electric vehicle newsletter, or wind energy newsletter.



Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

Tags: , , , ,


About the Author

currently works as Head-News & Data at Climate Connect Limited, a market research and analytics firm in the renewable energy and carbon markets domain. He earned his Master’s in Technology degree from The Energy & Resources Institute in Renewable Energy Engineering and Management. He also has a bachelor’s degree in Environmental Engineering. Mridul has a keen interest in renewable energy sector in India and emerging carbon markets like China and Australia.



  • http://www.tophatmoney.co.uk payday loan payday loan

    The Asian Development Bank (ADB) is supporting the construction and operation of a coal-fired integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) power plant in the People’s Republic of China (PRC), the first such plant in a developing nation. The ADB Board of Directors today approved a $135 million loan to build a 250-megawatt IGCC plant in Tianjin City that can generate up to 1470 gigawatt-hours of electricity every year. PRC is the world’s largest coal …

  • John

    Regarding nuclear — I think the French have shown that it is possible for nuclear power to be safe and secure. But of course, the French have also shown that it’s possible for “socialized” health care to be high quality and cost effective and that it’s possible for public transportation to be clean, comfortable, and fast.

    I’m afraid that the United States is politically incapable of achieving these things, so I’m forced to agree that nuclear is not a very appealing option in the US, at least for the time being.

  • John

    Regarding nuclear — I think the French have shown that it is possible for nuclear power to be safe and secure. But of course, the French have also shown that it’s possible for “socialized” health care to be high quality and cost effective and that it’s possible for public transportation to be clean, comfortable, and fast.

    I’m afraid that the United States is politically incapable of achieving these things, so I’m forced to agree that nuclear is not a very appealing option in the US, at least for the time being.

  • Mridul Chadha

    I completely agree that IGCC or super critical power plants based on coal gasification or natural gas or biomass can only serve as a bridge to cleaner technologies. I, however, have apprehensions regarding the nuclear power plants since waste management is a serious issue in addition to security and proliferation.

    Renewable energy technologies must be developed further in order to make them more affordable and efficient. India and China are planning massive renewable energy based power plants of the order 10 GW. Hopefully these plants can help develop more efficient large scale technologies. But until that happens super critical power plants could prove helpful in reducing carbon emissions and improving energy efficiency.

  • Mridul Chadha

    I completely agree that IGCC or super critical power plants based on coal gasification or natural gas or biomass can only serve as a bridge to cleaner technologies. I, however, have apprehensions regarding the nuclear power plants since waste management is a serious issue in addition to security and proliferation.

    Renewable energy technologies must be developed further in order to make them more affordable and efficient. India and China are planning massive renewable energy based power plants of the order 10 GW. Hopefully these plants can help develop more efficient large scale technologies. But until that happens super critical power plants could prove helpful in reducing carbon emissions and improving energy efficiency.

  • Charles Vismeg

    IGCC power plants are good interim solution for the United States also until advanced generation of safe nuclear power plants are built.

    I hope that nuclear fusion technology eventually will be a reality and can become practical for electrical power generation.

    Wind and solar energy sources still need to be developed and utilized, but the enormous power demand by industry and modern transportation will require the output of power plants for a long time to come. Minimizing GHG is a win-win approach.

  • Charles Vismeg

    IGCC power plants are good interim solution for the United States also until advanced generation of safe nuclear power plants are built.

    I hope that nuclear fusion technology eventually will be a reality and can become practical for electrical power generation.

    Wind and solar energy sources still need to be developed and utilized, but the enormous power demand by industry and modern transportation will require the output of power plants for a long time to come. Minimizing GHG is a win-win approach.

Back to Top ↑