CleanTechnica is the #1 cleantech-focused
website
 in the world. Subscribe today!


Carbon Tax katrina_remains

Published on January 1st, 2010 | by Susan Kraemer

17

New Carbon Footprint Calculation Accounts For Country of Consumption

Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

January 1st, 2010 by  

Norwegian scientists have created a new method of calculating carbon footprint that allocates the carbon produced in the country of consumption, not just in the country of production, bringing up some interesting issues and possible solutions to the difficulties of combating climate change.

[social_buttons]

This revised carbon footprint study makes it possible to calculate the carbon cost of imported goods accurately. The new study by Researchers at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology and the Centre of International Climate and Environment Research in Oslo and published at carbonfootprintofnations.com – incorporating these numbers – is important as we start to consider carbon reduction legislation.

While high consumption nations remain in most of the same positions relative to others, under this new calculation method, some of the changes are interesting.

The US still leads the world, but now tops the scale at 29 tonnes of carbon emitted per capita. Australia and Canada are next at about 21 tonnes. Malawi and Mozambique had the lowest per capita figures. Germany, Denmark, Norway and the UK were 10th at 15 tonnes per capita, but they did better than Switzerland, Finland, Ireland, Iceland, the Netherlands and Belgium that came in between 16 and 18 tonnes.

For rich nations; transport and manufactured goods provided most of the carbon footprint. Most of their consumption is produced in China. China’s own carbon footprint for its own consumers figured relatively low on these 2001 based figures, at just 3 tonnes per capita.

By 2050 we will all need to have moved to a 1 tonne per capita average, something that is not as hard to achieve as many imagine. Technically we could achieve it now, with current technologies.

The obstacle is the political difficulty of justifying such a radical switch from the traditional source of energy to the new sources from renewable energy. In already developed nations, an entrenched existing energy sector works to make the problem political rather than technical. And because it costs money to build any new energy infrastructure, existing infrastructure (that was paid off long ago) seems cheap by comparison.

But nations that have yet to build most of their energy infrastructure, like China present an opportunity for a more level playing field. China is now investing $9 billion every month on renewable energy.

For example, if every manufacturing plant in China were solar powered instead of (70%) coal powered as now, that would also reduce the carbon footprint of the high consumption nations, whose carbon footprint largely comes from manufactured goods mostly made in China. Even CCS in China could reduce rich nations carbon footprints by cutting carbon emissions from coal plants in China.

Related stories:

Developing World Assistance Likely to Bring $100 Billion Boom to Renewable Sector

US-China Ink Cleaner Coal Transfer

Obama Induces China to Cut GHG 40% and Share Electric Car Tech

Image: of personal belongings after Katrina by Zev Tiefenbach

Source: GreenWire.org

Keep up to date with all the hottest cleantech news by subscribing to our (free) cleantech newsletter, or keep an eye on sector-specific news by getting our (also free) solar energy newsletter, electric vehicle newsletter, or wind energy newsletter.



Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

Tags: , , , , ,


About the Author

writes at CleanTechnica, CSP-Today, PV-Insider , SmartGridUpdate, and GreenProphet. She has also been published at Ecoseed, NRDC OnEarth, MatterNetwork, Celsius, EnergyNow, and Scientific American. As a former serial entrepreneur in product design, Susan brings an innovator's perspective on inventing a carbon-constrained civilization: If necessity is the mother of invention, solving climate change is the mother of all necessities! As a lover of history and sci-fi, she enjoys chronicling the strange future we are creating in these interesting times.    Follow Susan on Twitter @dotcommodity.



  • http://cleantechnica.com/2010/01/01/new-carbon-footprint-calculation-accounts-for-country-of-consumption/ Sarah

    get a life

  • http://cleantechnica.com/2010/01/01/new-carbon-footprint-calculation-accounts-for-country-of-consumption/ Sarah

    get a life

  • http://cleantechnica.com/2010/01/01/new-carbon-footprint-calculation-accounts-for-country-of-consumption/ Sarah

    hahahahahaha it subbmittted waahoooo

  • http://cleantechnica.com/2010/01/01/new-carbon-footprint-calculation-accounts-for-country-of-consumption/ Sarah

    hahahahahaha it subbmittted waahoooo

  • http://cleantechnica.com/2010/01/01/new-carbon-footprint-calculation-accounts-for-country-of-consumption/ Sarah

    hahahahahaha it subbmittted waahoooo

  • http://cleantechnica.com/2010/01/01/new-carbon-footprint-calculation-accounts-for-country-of-consumption/ Sarah

    hahahahahaha it subbmittted waahoooo

  • http://cleantechnica.com/2010/01/01/new-carbon-footprint-calculation-accounts-for-country-of-consumption/ Sarah

    wikked sweet mmmmaaayynnnn

  • http://cleantechnica.com/2010/01/01/new-carbon-footprint-calculation-accounts-for-country-of-consumption/ Sarah

    wikked sweet mmmmaaayynnnn

  • http://cleantechnica.com/2010/01/01/new-carbon-footprint-calculation-accounts-for-country-of-consumption/ Sarah

    wikked sweet mmmmaaayynnnn

  • Susan Kraemer

    Sorry about that. I’m a visual person and prefer stories online with pictures. (I hate that when Scientific American reprints my pieces they leave off the picture!) Wish I could tweak it for your bandwidth problems

  • Susan Kraemer

    Sorry about that. I’m a visual person and prefer stories online with pictures. (I hate that when Scientific American reprints my pieces they leave off the picture!) Wish I could tweak it for your bandwidth problems

  • http://brianhayes.com Brian Hayes

    Sorry to grumpy, Susan. I very much enjoy your concise posts. I use cellular EVDO because I’m slightly rural that’s encumbered with a 5 gig cap that’s bent me. I realize my gripe was unneeded and corny.

  • http://brianhayes.com Brian Hayes

    Sorry to grumpy, Susan. I very much enjoy your concise posts. I use cellular EVDO because I’m slightly rural that’s encumbered with a 5 gig cap that’s bent me. I realize my gripe was unneeded and corny.

  • http://brianhayes.com Brian Hayes

    It’s nice and sometimes appropriate to publish masthead or story images.

    But this 500px × 427px 55K abandoned Teddy Bear isn’t functional, unless it’s intended to induce flame, and merely burns [my limited] bandwidth.

    One routine example of many large CleanTechnica pics.

  • http://brianhayes.com Brian Hayes

    It’s nice and sometimes appropriate to publish masthead or story images.

    But this 500px × 427px 55K abandoned Teddy Bear isn’t functional, unless it’s intended to induce flame, and merely burns [my limited] bandwidth.

    One routine example of many large CleanTechnica pics.

  • http://brianhayes.com Brian Hayes

    It’s nice and sometimes appropriate to publish masthead or story images.

    But this 500px × 427px 55K abandoned Teddy Bear isn’t functional, unless it’s intended to induce flame, and merely burns [my limited] bandwidth.

    One routine example of many large CleanTechnica pics.

  • Susan Kraemer

    Sorry about that. I’m a visual person and prefer stories online with pictures. (I hate that when Scientific American reprints my pieces they leave off the picture!) Wish I could tweak it for your bandwidth problems

Back to Top ↑