CleanTechnica is the #1 cleantech-focused
website
 in the world. Subscribe today!


Solar Energy Sharp's new compound cell sets new record for solar cell conversion efficiency.

Published on October 25th, 2009 | by Tina Casey

8

Sharp Nails a Record 35.8% Solar Conversion Efficiency

Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

October 25th, 2009 by  

Sharp Corporation has just announced that it has achieved the world’s highest solar cell conversion efficiency using a compound layered design based on the technology used in the solar cells that power space satellites.  Mindful of the link between sustainable energy and the future market for consumer electronics, Sharp has been aggressively pursuing solar efficiency improvements that lend themselves to commercial application.

Instead of silicon, compound solar cells use two or more photo-absorption layers composed of different elements.  The trick is to find materials that generate the most current with the least waste.  Sharp’s innovation is a proprietary technology that enables it to produce a high-efficiency crystalline compound, InGaAs (indium-gallium-arsenide), which boosted the efficiency of Sharp’s previous cells from 31.5% to 35.8%.

Solar Cell Efficiency Records on the Rise

So far, Sharp’s new triple-junction compound solar cell beats out the achievements of conventional silicon-based technology, but even silicon cells are showing rapid improvements.  Last year researchers at the University of South Wales in Australia announced the first silicon cell to reach 25% conversion efficiency, and this summer that SunTech announced a  solar conversion efficiency of 15.6% for its multi-crystalline silicon solar module.  MIT scientists are working on an organic dye that could boost solar cell efficiency by 50%, and the U.S. Department of Energy has awarded a grant to develop an anti-reflective coating that boosts solar efficiency for thin film solar cells.

Compound Solar Cells

Compound solar cells typically include a bottom layer of germanium (Ge), which is relatively easy to manufacture.  On the down side, Ge wastes most of the current that it generates. Sharp’s InGaAs has a much higher efficiency but it is difficult to produce in the desired high crystalline form.  Sharp was able to solve the problem through its proprietary process for forming the layers in the cell, a breakthrough that it credits to working with NEDO, Japan’s public entity for promoting research and development.

A Note on Solar Efficiency

The number of solar products in and out of development is skyrocketing, and there are various means and standards of judging conversion efficiency.  Sharp bases its claim of 35.8% efficiency on a cell surface of approximately one square centimeter, as confirmed by Japan’s National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology.  Working with a team of U.S. researchers, the University of South Wales has achieved 43% solar conversion efficiency using a combination of five cells, one silicon and the other four composed of gallium, indium, phosphorus and arsenic, as verified by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory in the U.S.  The design is far from commercial viability, but it provides a glimpse of still more improvements in solar efficiency to come.

Image: X-ray image of the sun by NASA Godard Laboratory via wikimediacommons.

Keep up to date with all the hottest cleantech news by subscribing to our (free) cleantech newsletter, or keep an eye on sector-specific news by getting our (also free) solar energy newsletter, electric vehicle newsletter, or wind energy newsletter.



Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

Tags: , , , ,


About the Author

Tina Casey specializes in military and corporate sustainability, advanced technology, emerging materials, biofuels, and water and wastewater issues. Tina’s articles are reposted frequently on Reuters, Scientific American, and many other sites. Views expressed are her own. Follow her on Twitter @TinaMCasey and Google+.



  • http://www.nrel.gov Joe Verrengia

    The University of New South Wales 43% efficiency is a projection based on the capabilities of each layer, and is not an actual efficiency result. NREL has not recognized the result that UNSW has claimed.

    Joe Verrengia

    Sr. Administrator, Public Affairs

    NREL

  • http://www.nrel.gov Joe Verrengia

    The University of New South Wales 43% efficiency is a projection based on the capabilities of each layer, and is not an actual efficiency result. NREL has not recognized the result that UNSW has claimed.

    Joe Verrengia

    Sr. Administrator, Public Affairs

    NREL

  • Captain Morgan

    GaAs will never see the light of day (so to speak). It costs a small fortune as compared to traditional silicon, and a large fortune as compared to thin film.

  • Captain Morgan

    GaAs will never see the light of day (so to speak). It costs a small fortune as compared to traditional silicon, and a large fortune as compared to thin film.

  • mds

    Am I missing something? How is this a “world record” if others have already build cells with conversion efficiencies in excess of 40%?

  • mds

    Am I missing something? How is this a “world record” if others have already build cells with conversion efficiencies in excess of 40%?

  • http://extremegreenvillage.com Bob

    I love when you cover a story like this.

    I would like a list of all the highest efficiency methods of solar power including PV but also all other forms.

    I would like to know how close they are to wide spread use and the cost per kilowatt.

  • http://extremegreenvillage.com Bob

    I love when you cover a story like this.

    I would like a list of all the highest efficiency methods of solar power including PV but also all other forms.

    I would like to know how close they are to wide spread use and the cost per kilowatt.

Back to Top ↑