Race for Scotland’s $15 Million Marine Energy Prize Begins
Solving our energy crisis requires serious manpower— and serious incentives. That’s why Scotland has launched the $15 million (€10 million) Saltire Prize Challenge to create commercially viable wave or tidal power.
- » See also: Water and Energy - A Crisis and An Opportunity
- » Get CleanTechnica by RSS or sign up by email.
In order to win the award, teams have to prove out their technology in Scottish waters. The winning team is required to supply sea power for a two year period.
Ocean power is a big deal for Scotland, which has been called the “Saudi Arabia of marine energy”. The country holds a quarter of Europe’s wave power potential.
But while Scotland will certainly reap the majority of the benefits from the contest, other countries with lesser ocean power potential will still be able to make use of the technology— once marine power is economically viable, it will become much more attractive to nations around the world.
Photo Credit: NREL









About time - except why does it always have to be a prize? What’s wrong with the Scottish Parliament pointing out to their planet-trashing-people how they are surrounded by sea, all of it extremely active with big waves and big tides? Being unable to harness that energy is just pathetic.
Hey, be positive dude. I’m not sure that $15 million is a huge sum for the Scottish Parliament to be worrying themselves with. It’s a way to get people outside of the usual multibillion dollar corporations involved in creating solutions. I’m sure the parliament is busy working on other bills to push green technological development in the same direction.
hmmmmm…
So presumably Matthew has the technology to to harness all that energy, or is he pathetic also? And I’m curious as to why Scots are referred to as ‘planet-trashing-people.’ How many other countries are offering such incentives?
Planet trashing people?
Somehow I don’t think Scotlands population has as big an impact on the planet as other nations such as the USA or China. We have some of the cleanest air in the world and most of our countryside is unspoilt. And Scotland does invest a lot of cash into wind/wave/hyrdo energy. Not so much into Solar though.
Hurray for Scotland doing something worthwhile. This is better than the X Prize.
Great project. However, the photo looks like a southeast view of the island of Oahu, Hawaii with Diamondhead in the background.
I don’t believe this overly ambitious (to put it mildly) concept was well thought out - from the standpoint of would-be competitors. Clearly it would require an investment of many multiples the award amount and many, many years of effort (at least 10) to come even close to the 100GwH of energy to be generated in the first attempt. This - likely - unattainable goal, will either guarantee that Scotland will never have to make good on any payment (while costing entrants many millions) and will exclude ALL individual, small, and medium size entities from participating, since any viable (single) device will cost at least $1-10M to develop and will probably not be successful. Since many of such devices would have to be built (and paid for) and work, simultaneously, and ‘perfectly’ for a continuous period of two years, I don’t think that there are many investors that would take such a ‘hugely risky’ bet, for a payoff that would be a small fraction of the original investment. Wouldn’t it be better to have a competition that would encourage as many innovative individuals and companies to participate, as possible, and make this an annual competition that would award smaller prizes over many years (until a clearly preferred method(s) is/are found)? Then there could be many smaller prizes awarded annually and 1-3 ‘grand prizes’ awarded after maybe a decade of such ‘annual’ competitions and investigations. Of coarse, this would require that the 100GhW ‘bar’ be reduced to something much more reasonable, like 1GhW/year, and that this annual goal be estimated over a 1-week long competition period.
I would like to see dozens of technologies competing at the same time, with financing being a rather minor consideration and requirement. Only then would this competition truly serve the stated intention of seeking the very best technological approach from ANYWHERE in the world, instead of ’something’ that only a huge corporation could possibly underwrite, or one that might give preference to a Scottish technology .