That seems like a logical explanation, but Wall Street didn’t respond well to the 3rd quarter numbers and the stock price took a hit after their release. Additionally, not everyone is buying that argument. Troy Teslike and others have attributed the lower-than-expected delivery total to a drop in vehicle demand in China. “The number of buyers who want to take delivery dropped sharply and suddenly in Q3. Tesla wasn’t expecting that. 22K fewer deliveries than production in Q3 wasn’t the plan,” Troy wrote in response to the question, “Troy why do you think they expanded capacity in Shanghai if the demand is not there?#8221;
Though, that raises more questions. One person asked, “If this is true, why hasn’t Tesla dropped prices in China yet? You would think they have better knowledge than you on demand side, and if you say demand has dried up — they would know. And if demand, in fact, has dried up — why aren’t they cutting prices?#8221; Someone else asked if Troy agreed with decades-long Wall Street analyst and Managing Partner of The Future Fund LLC, Gary Black, that this slump was “just a temporary drop in China as people are waiting for better incentives/price, or do you think it’s more of a long term issue?#8221; Troy agreed with that take. “Yes, I think it’s a pricing issue. Potential buyers still like the car.”
Though, others raised questions about the economic situation in China and whether the purported drop in demand is more systemic and more serious. “Recession in China is real? Real estate caused it, maybe, or COVID lockdowns, or supply chain disruptions reducing incomes, etc.?#8221; Someone else noted, “BYD and one other Chinese company have exceeded expections. With the zero covid policy, the Chinese consumers are feeling poorer and are opting to buy the cheaper EV models.”
A Daniel Lee wrote, “Obsession with ‘50%’ growth is overblown. 50% growth under normal macro is extremely difficult, name another co. that does it. In 2022, once-in-a-life, multiple-threat Macro (WW3, supply chain, Covid, Fed hikes), WS needs wake up and appreciate Tesla’s amazing progress! Damn it.” Similarly, another account writes, “I think it is unfair to expect them to hit 50% now given the Q2 lockdowns. They would have easily hit 50% if they didn’t lose 70k-80k in Q2. Beyond their control really!” There are strong arguments there as to what unexpected external factors could have caused a somewhat weaker than expected year from Tesla. It’s hard to argue that each of those factors didn’t have more of an impact than should have been foreseen. Yet, at the same time, if the drop in deliveries was actually due to Chinese demand being lower than expected until just the past couple of months, that would raise some concerns about Tesla’s future growth plans, particularly in the biggest automotive and biggest EV market in the world — by a wide margin.
Arguments go back and forth on these matters, and more as well, such as large macroeconomic factors such as global inflation, potential recession on the horizon, and Russia’s globally disruptive invasion of Ukraine. Nonetheless, I think this final tweet summarizes the situation best of all and even does so while feeding Tesla [NASDAQ:TSLA] critics and fans: