When asked about his ridiculous comments about “my beautiful Christians” not needing to vote in the future, he responds with a rambling mess of an answer that doesn’t even answer the question. He talks about how much the audience likes him, and how bad his competition is doing at pleasing his biggest fans, and keeps going off on tangents. He peppers in words like “tremendous” to try to sound smart and grand, but without organizing bigger words like that into a clear, organized argument explaining why his “beautiful” fans won’t need to vote in the future.
It’s kind of like going to a literature class without having read the pages for the day and then trying to convince the professor that you know anything about the book, but with the mannerisms and behavior of a used car salesman mixed in.
To be fair, let’s look at someone on the Democratic Party side who sometimes gets into these weird “word salad” moments:
She sounds more intelligent than Trump, but she’s not saying anything. No point is being made. Nothing is being conveyed to the audience. And, this isn’t the first time we’ve seen her do this. There’s the whole “Ukraine is a country” answer she once gave to try to show she did the readings.
My point with sharing these clips isn’t to bash on anybody. My point is that this is the quality of leadership that the United States has gotten so bad that people like Donald Trump and Kamala Harris are seen as normal or even acceptable. I’m sure they have their better moments, but there’s no shortage of amazing moments where Pete Buttigieg delivers a coherent argument and takes disingenuous actors to school. Here’s another one:
Instead of getting dragged into the mud and arguing over the proper role of government, Buttigieg goes straight for the factual underpinnings behind the guy’s argument and systematically takes them down. He came prepared to answer most of the questions, but knew enough to speak beyond the notes to support the dismantling of the argument. He didn’t take any crap off of the guy, but took him down without any name-calling, side tangents, or other attempts to distract the audience.
Compared to the other examples above (and many other moments we’ve seen), Secretary Pete makes them sound like this:
We Should Demand Better
Instead of having leaders who make everyone dumber for listening to them, we should expect competence and a thorough understanding of the subject matter at hand. When that isn’t available, leadership should defer to someone else who has that level of knowledge or say that they’ll get back to the person later with more information (this would shows a desire to want to get it right instead of just trying to sound intelligent).
Not everyone can be an eloquent public speaker who can come up with arguments on the spot and present them well, but these people owe it to us to at least explain what they can and promise to get back to someone later on the things they don’t know instead of just rambling and acting like narcissists. A shred of humility would be needed to do that, and sadly, far too many politicians these days just don’t have any on hand.
Is that really too much to ask?
Featured image: Screenshot from the embedded video
Sign up for CleanTechnica's Weekly Substack for Zach and Scott's in-depth analyses and high level summaries, sign up for our daily newsletter, and follow us on Google News!
Whether you have solar power or not, please complete our latest solar power survey.
Have a tip for CleanTechnica? Want to advertise? Want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.
Sign up for our daily newsletter for 15 new cleantech stories a day. Or sign up for our weekly one on top stories of the week if daily is too frequent.
Advertisement
CleanTechnica's Comment Policy