New aggregated data from the gurus over at A Better Route Planner show that Tesla Model 3 efficiency is the highest of any production car at highway speeds, with outstandingly low energy consumption. This outstanding efficiency, combined with great Supercharging speeds, makes the Model 3 the best road tripping EV in production.
According to EPA highway efficiency ratings, Tesla Model 3 efficiency in highway conditions (123 MPGe) is better even than that of the Hyundai Ioniq (122 MPGe), a much smaller, lighter, and less powerful EV with much lower range.
However, the MPGe figures are a bit of a fudge, and it’s hard to get good-quality real-world data on vehicle efficiency (for both EVs and gas vehicles). Manufacturer claims are usually wildly exaggerated, aided by the confounding inaccuracy of official test data from the EPA, the WLTP, and the appalling (though now thankfully almost defunct) NEDC rating schemes. The EPA ratings come closest to reality, but are still often overly optimistic and can be fudged for marketing purposes.
To be fair, absolute efficiency does depend a great deal on a wide multitude of environmental variables which are necessarily different on every route and even every drive. This means that there can not be one “absolutely correct” range/efficiency figure independent of the specific conditions of a particular journey. However, that does not excuse the fact that WLTP ratings (to a lesser extent) and NEDC ratings (to an absurd extent) are way over-calibrated and never nearly achievable in real-world driving. These rating agencies are to the car industry what the IEA is to the fossil fuel industry — thinly veiled support for the big players to continue their damaging and abusive practices.
To give just one contemporary example, when Top Gear recently tested the Jaguar I-PACE’s range, their engineer contact at Jaguar admitted that the vehicle would have to be driven at a steady 45 mph with all auxiliary systems turned off (no AC, no heating) to get anywhere close to the official 298 mile WLTP range. Even when enduring such discomfort on a long summer road trip, the testers could only achieve 294 miles of range equivalence, and estimated that realistic highway range would be well under 200 miles.
We don’t yet have WLTP figures for Tesla vehicles. The EU’s WLTP rules state that, “WLTP will apply to all new car registrations from September 2018” but that “EU measures for end-of-series cars allow for a limited number of unsold vehicles in stock that were approved under the old test (NEDC) to be sold the following year, that is until September 2019.” This latter clause will be used by some manufacturers to continue to fudge things for a while longer. Tesla’s vehicles are top of the class for efficiency, so Tesla has less motivation to dither and delay than all other manufacturers. When every vehicle is subject to the new, tougher (but still inadequate) WLTP grading system, Teslas will still be leading the pack.
We do already have reliable real-world data on many of the Tesla models, though, thanks to Bo, the lead creator of the excellent A Better Route Planner (ABPR) tool, and the rest of the team over at ABPR. As well as giving highly detailed and accurate route planning, ABRP users can contribute logged data to the team. Originally, this was set up for Tesla vehicles and owners, but now Chevy Bolt owners can get involved and the facility for owners of other EVs to contribute data is in the works. This is currently one of the most unbiased methods to contribute real-world data and see aggregated results for real-world EV efficiency.
In their latest aggregated data release, the team have provided excellent data on the Model 3. Check out their full post for all the information. In comparison to the I-PACE, the Tesla Model 3 efficiency, even with a much smaller battery, allows it an average range at GPS-measured 45 mph of over 410 miles, some 40% greater than the Jaguar. Here are some other data insights (metric and imperial):
The DC charging speed of the Tesla Model 3’s BT37 type battery on Tesla Superchargers is also outstanding (1st graph below), though not quite as fast over as wide a state of charge (SOC) range as the 100 kWh BTX6 batteries of its larger siblings (2nd graph below):
However, given the Model 3’s incomparable highway efficiency — i.e., the distance that it can travel on each kWh of energy — a given amount of time spent at a charger replenishes range at a rate that exceeds even its larger siblings. To quote from the ABRP post:
Take a fictitious road trip with 200 km (124 miles) between Superchargers. Drive at a constant highway speed, 120 km/h (75 mph) between chargers for a total of 1000 km (620 miles). The result according to ABRP looks like this:
- Model 3 Long Range: Total trip duration 09:43, of which charging 01:23
- Model S100D: Total trip duration 10:05, of which charging 01:45
- Model X100D: Total trip duration 10:29, of which charging 02:09
So the overall winner in that road trip race is clearly Model 3 Long Range.
Although the Model 3 has the best overall trip profile, clearly, all of the big-battery Tesla models are great for road tripping thanks to their relative efficiency, range, charging speed, and the good distribution of DC charging points (i.e., the Supercharger network).
Comparison with Next Best EV
The nearest competitor to Tesla on practical range and charging is the Hyundai Kona 64 kWh, for which we are just starting to get good real-world data. Bjorn Nyland recently conducted some careful range and charging tests, and found that the Kona has a very good efficiency of 189–190 Wh/km at 120 km/h (in ideal conditions). According to ABRP’s data, the Tesla Model 3 uses just 157 Wh/km at 120 km/h (in ideal conditions), some 17% less. Given that the Kona is a small SUV form factor, the high-speed efficiency is still very impressive. On the charging side, Fastned has now accumulated enough data to derive an aggregated Kona 64 kWh charging curve, which agrees well with Bjorn’s DC charging tests:
It is vital to note that the availability of 100 kW, 150 kW, 175 kW, or higher powered chargers for all non-Tesla vehicles is still very limited, and in reality at least 95% of charging opportunities on an average road trip in 2018 will be limited to 50 kW chargers (the blue line in the above chart). This will remain the case for another year or so, but is steadily improving. To see what a difference Tesla’s Supercharging capability and infrastructure network make for adding driving range on a 30 minute break, look at the following charts (metric above and imperial below):
The Tesla’s recharging figures (the green sections in the graphs) will be reliably achieved, whilst the Kona will be limited to the 50 kW DC chargers (the left most column) in over 95% of cases, and only rarely encounter 175 kW charging infrastructure (the middle column). So, whilst the Model 3 will typically pick up 186 miles (299 km) of highway range from a 30 minute charge, the Kona will typically pick up only 75 miles (120 km) over that 30 minutes. In 2 or 3 years time, a decent portion of 30 minute DC charging stops might add 113 miles (182 km) to the Kona’s range.
Note also that the Kona is being produced in comparatively low volumes, in large part because Hyundai (along with most other non-Tesla manufacturers) is losing money on its EVs. However, the Kona is still a great value EV for those who manage to get a hold of one, by far the best of the non-Tesla EVs currently available in terms of practical range and efficiency.
Check out the original aggregated data from the team at A Better Route Planner and consider contributing your own data samples to help them out, so they can help all of us out with solid EV efficiency and range data.Appreciate CleanTechnica’s originality and cleantech news coverage? Consider becoming a CleanTechnica Member, Supporter, Technician, or Ambassador — or a patron on Patreon.
Don't want to miss a cleantech story? Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!
Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.