Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

CleanTechnica
You want numbers proving that Trump is on the wrong side of history when it comes to climate change, the Paris agreement, and the battle between clean energy and dirty coal? We’ve got numbers for you.

Clean Power

Market Forces Are With Clean Energy, Not With Trump

You want numbers proving that Trump is on the wrong side of history when it comes to climate change, the Paris agreement, and the battle between clean energy and dirty coal? We’ve got numbers for you.

Originally published on Red Green & Blue.

You want numbers proving that Trump is on the wrong side of history when it comes to climate change, the Paris agreement, and the battle between clean energy and dirty coal? We’ve got numbers for you.

Writing in the Wall Street Journal, Jason Bordoff (@JasonBordoff), founding director of the Center on Global Energy Policy at Columbia University, says energy is undergoing a profound transformation, and nobody can turn back that tide.

For example, here’s what he has to say about coal:

  • Coal employment has been in structural decline for decades, falling from a peak of more than 800,000 in the 1920s to 130,000 in 2011 to just over 70,000 today.
  • By the end of 2015, U.S. coal production was down more than 20% from its 2011 level, and the combined value of the top four U.S. coal firms fell from $33 billion to $150 million.’

That’s an incredible collapse. When Donald Trump said he’ll put coal miners back to work by gutting environmental regulations (AKA, protections to keep Appalachian kids from drinking poisoned water and to keep their dads from dying of lung disease), he’s lying.

Bordorff says regulation didn’t kill those jobs; it was the the good ol’ free market:

  • Increased competition from cheap natural gas is responsible for 49% of the decline in domestic coal consumption;
  • Lower-than-expected electricity demand is responsible for 26%;
  • The growth in renewable energy accounts for 18%.
  • Environmental regulations explain around 3-5% of the decline.

What could save coal? He says only an unlikely market reversal that would see prices rise for fracked gas and renewable energy – when in reality both have been steadily declining.

He adds that half of the revenue the coal companies lost in the past 5 years came from China’s slowdown. Ten years ago the coal barons were trying to work out ways to ship their dirty product by rail through west coast ports to fuel the booming Chinese market; China is still booming, but they want clean energy, not coal.

And Trump can gush all he wants about opening up more public lands for coal mines, but what’s the point? US coal companies don’t have the capital, banks are wisely refusing to invest in a dying industry, and there’s no market for the stuff even if they COULD be developed.

And the same thing is true of oil industry jobs. US oil output was ALREADY set to rise 1 million barrels a day in 2017 before Trump even showed up, mostly because of improved technology (much of it developed by government research programs Trump is talking about cutting). Slashing production regulations and letting industry waste methane by burning it off won’t make a difference.

The flip side, of course, is that oil prices ARE low, so expensive-to-produce oil, like that found in the Arctic Wildlife Refuge, won’t go on line any time soon. Once again, the market trumps Trump.

As for LNG (Liquified Natural Gas), Trump is easing rules on export at exactly the wrong time. Again, the global market is glutted and prices are low.

And what makes all of these market-denying moves by Trump even worse is: They ignore the very real costs that all of these forms of dirty energy production lay on the rest of the economy, which include such tangible items as:

As Bordoff concludes, “…Sensible, cost-effective regulations not only impose costs, but can also deliver much larger benefits by protecting air and water, not to mention bolstering the industry’s social license to operate… markets will trump policy in determining the outlook for U.S. domestic energy production.”

Reprinted with permission.

 
Appreciate CleanTechnica’s originality? Consider becoming a CleanTechnica Member, Supporter, Technician, or Ambassador — or a patron on Patreon.
 
 

Advertisement
 
Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

Written By

Jeremy Bloom is the Editor of RedGreenAndBlue.

Comments

You May Also Like

Batteries

Originally published at Green Energy Times. An Old Paradigm The electricity most of us use comes from a system that was designed mostly over...

Climate Change

Another CleanTechnica article rightly tells us how great the China-US climate agreement is. In terms of total emissions from 1850 to present, the US...

Climate Change

"When China Rules the World" is more important to read for westerners than "The Light That Failed," but the two books together paint a much more...

Clean Transport

When considering the transition from gasoline and diesel-powered vehicles to electric, it is easy to see the disruption this will bring to the auto...

Copyright © 2021 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.