Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

CleanTechnica
As Hans-Josef Fell points out, renewable sources provided 186 TWh in 2016. That’s not bad, but only 3 TWh over the result of 2015. That’s stagnation. And it shows that the move to an auction model from 2014 on is a policy failure.

Clean Power

Germany’s Move To A Renewables Auction Model Is A Policy Failure

As Hans-Josef Fell points out, renewable sources provided 186 TWh in 2016. That’s not bad, but only 3 TWh over the result of 2015. That’s stagnation. And it shows that the move to an auction model from 2014 on is a policy failure.

Originally published on Lenz Blog.
By Karl-Friedrich Lenz

The numbers for 2016 are in, and they don’t look good.

As Hans-Josef Fell points out in this comment, renewable sources provided 186 TWh in 2016. That’s not bad, but only 3 TWh over the result of 2015. That’s stagnation. And it shows that the move to an auction model from 2014 on is a policy failure.

Other countries should learn from this failure and avoid making the same mistake.

Germans should learn from this failure and vote Green in the next election.

As a result, CO2 emissions from the power sector even increased in 2016, by 0.9 percent.

Until now, it has been possible to keep the promise of the 2011 legislation that cancelled 1804 TWh of nuclear power generation permits. That promise was to replace that low CO2 supply with new renewable capacity.

Hans-Josef Fell can’t be described as a large fan of nuclear power. I disagree with him about which risk is greater (nuclear or CO2).

But we completely agree that you need to step on the gas, not on the brakes regarding renewable, and one of the reasons for that is the need to replace low CO2 nuclear capacity in the next couple of years.

Of course, if you increase the renewable share further, fossil fuel will be used less, leading to potential losses for the mining of fossil fuel and the operators of fossil fuel power plants, with jobs lost in these sectors. Addressing their needs may be necessary to stop these artificial slowdowns.

The way to do this is to introduce a feed-in tariff for fossil fuel. I discussed this idea in detail in 2015. In short, that would guarantee that coal and gas power plants can operate at a decent profit, while also making sure that their share declines every year.

The basic policy deal would be: Accept that your market shares are going down to a small percentage over the next couple of decades. In return, we make sure that the price is high enough to guarantee a profit.

Reprinted with permission.

 
Don't want to miss a cleantech story? Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!
 

Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.
Advertisement
 
 

Written By

We publish a number of guest posts from experts in a large variety of fields. This is our contributor account for those special people, organizations, agencies, and companies.

Comments

You May Also Like

Batteries

The solid-state EV battery of the future is not quite there yet, but BMW Group has seen enough to nail down an R&D partnership...

Cars

Almost one out of every three new vehicles sold in Germany in 2022 had a plug.

Clean Power

One of the big criticisms anti-EV people try to level against cleaner vehicles is the environmental costs of production. In many cases, it’s a...

Aviation

There's a lot to like in the new US transportation decarbonization blueprint. It's actually very good in most ways, which is excellent to see...

Copyright © 2023 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.