Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

In a recent Science article, President Obama outlines a future where cleantech will lead economic and environmental health.

Clean Power

Obama Argues In The Journal Science For An Environmental & Economic Future With Cleantech

In a recent Science article, President Obama outlines a future where cleantech will lead economic and environmental health.

President Barack Obama has written in the journal Science that private-sector incentives can help drive decoupling of emissions and spur economic growth.

In the data-driven article, Obama describes how the release of carbon dioxide (CO2) and other greenhouse gases (GHGs) due to human activity is increasing global average surface air temperatures, disrupting weather patterns, and acidifying the ocean. He says that, left unchecked, the continued growth of GHG emissions could cause global average temperatures to increase by another 4°C or more by 2100 and by 1.5 to 2 times as much in many mid-continent and far northern locations.


The Science article continues the moral narrative that President Obama has made throughout his presidency for investing in clean energy technologies such as wind and solar. All along he has supported US initiatives toward slashing emissions of greenhouse gases to stave off the worse effects of global warming.

Obama reinforces his position that sustainable energy makes economic sense. This is in direct contrast to his successor’s continued climate denier position, which seems to be directed toward renewed fossil fuel production. “Although our understanding of the impacts of climate change is increasingly and disturbingly clear,” Obama writes, “there is still debate about the proper course for U.S. policy — a debate that is very much on display during the current presidential transition.” He asks us to put politics aside and to look to the substantive economic and scientific evidence that trends toward a clean-energy economy will continue.

Indeed, the data that Obama includes points to economic downward spirals should the US decide not to engage in robust economic policies that focus on alternative energies. “Evidence is mounting that any economic strategy that ignores carbon pollution will impose tremendous costs to the global economy and will result in fewer jobs and less economic growth over the long term.” He outlines how one of the most frequently cited economic models pins the estimate of annual damages from warming of 4°C at ~4% of global GDP (4–6), which could lead to lost U.S. federal revenue of roughly $340 billion to $690 billion annually.

Investments will be needed to reduce emissions, Obama conceded. However, he says that such capital expenditures will increase resilience and preparedness for the changes in climate, and they can no longer be avoided. Indeed, he argues that these investments will be modest in comparison with the benefits from avoided climate-change damages. He envisions that governmental infrastructures from states, localities, and businesses will invest, take common-sense steps, and disclose climate risk to taxpayers, homeowners, shareholders, and customers. Global insurance and reinsurance businesses, he reminded us, are already taking such steps as their analytical models reveal growing climate risk.

Businesses, too, are quietly conceding that reducing emissions is good for the environment and for profitability. Obama says that when businesses cut costs for consumers, they deliver returns for shareholders. He points to ways that greenhouse gas mitigation “need not conflict with economic growth. Rather, it can boost efficiency, productivity, and innovation.”

The enormous scientific record shows the urgency of acting to mitigate climate change. “I remain convinced that no country is better suited to confront the climate challenge and reap the economic benefits of a low-carbon future than the United States,” President Obama reiterates, “and that continued participation in the Paris process will yield great benefit for the American people, as well as the international community. Prudent U.S. policy over the next several decades would prioritize, among other actions, decarbonizing the U.S. energy system, storing carbon and reducing emissions within U.S. lands, and reducing non-CO2 emissions.”

Obama ends the Science article by turning to the power of the incoming US executive branch. Since the Trump administration has the autonomy to prescribe policy, the latest science and economics may provide the new US leadership with “a helpful guide for what the future may bring, in many cases independent of near-term policy choices, when it comes to combatting climate change and transitioning to a clean-energy economy.”

He adds, “I believe the trend toward clean energy is irreversible.”

Photo credit: Beverly & Pack via / CC BY

I don't like paywalls. You don't like paywalls. Who likes paywalls? Here at CleanTechnica, we implemented a limited paywall for a while, but it always felt wrong — and it was always tough to decide what we should put behind there. In theory, your most exclusive and best content goes behind a paywall. But then fewer people read it! We just don't like paywalls, and so we've decided to ditch ours. Unfortunately, the media business is still a tough, cut-throat business with tiny margins. It's a never-ending Olympic challenge to stay above water or even perhaps — gasp — grow. So ...
If you like what we do and want to support us, please chip in a bit monthly via PayPal or Patreon to help our team do what we do! Thank you!
Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!

Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

Written By

Carolyn Fortuna (they, them), Ph.D., is a writer, researcher, and educator with a lifelong dedication to ecojustice. Carolyn has won awards from the Anti-Defamation League, The International Literacy Association, and The Leavy Foundation. Carolyn is a small-time investor in Tesla. Please follow Carolyn on Twitter and Facebook.


You May Also Like

Clean Power

We've mined enormous amounts of iron and coal in order to build infrastructure to extract, process, refine, and distribute fossil fuels, and we're going...

Clean Power

The Senator from West Virginia's coal country accuses the Biden Administration of elevating "climate goals above the energy and national security of this nation."...

Clean Power

Repowering an existing wind farm is one way to get around the anti-wind movement and keep pumping more clean kilowatts into the grid.

Climate Change

Wucker's work is much more read and attended to in Asia than in the west. Short-termism and individualism has reached its nadir in too...

Copyright © 2023 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.