Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

CleanTechnica

Air Quality

Destroying The Earth & Sexually Assaulting Women — Not All That Disconnected

Look, we all make mistakes, but we also have a range of certain sensitivities and limits that we know not to cross. These are limits we don’t just know logically, but that we have a broader emotional sense and perhaps spiritual sense not to cross.

Again, we all fail, but not all of us murder, kidnap, or commit sexual assault.

Coal smokestack via ShutterstockThere has long been a strong intellectual discussion about the connections between such horrific human-to-human actions and the way we treat the natural resources of the world. For decades, terms like “raping the earth” have been used in both academic and colloquial circles. This is not just for rhetorical effect, but because both activities involve a lack of sensitivity, a lack of empathy, a lack of morals, and in the most cerebral way, a lack of foresight.

No, mining and burning coal for electricity (at a time when we finally have better options) is not the same as actual human rape and sexual assault, but the lack of sensitivity and the lack of appropriate limits come from a similar source.

I think it isn’t a pure coincidence that the political candidates who are routinely promoting less clean energy, more deadly energy, and weaker regulations are also often the candidates who are not pushing for women’s rights and equity — and who may even be pushing for the opposite.

deathbedIt’s not all that surprising that political candidates who think a past when dark-skinned people and women had fewer rights and less wealth was “great” also want to bring us backward into a world full of health-destroying smoke from coal power plants and inefficient vehicles.

Now, I’m not going to highlight any particular candidates (for example, Donald Trump). I’m not going to say that Trump, his supporters, and the politicians who spent the last few decades opening the door to his candidacy actually support sexual assault. Maybe they do, maybe they do, I don’t know. Some people say they do, but I don’t have the details so I won’t say they do. It would be really horrible if they do, and I hear some really trustworthy people say they do, but I won’t say anything about it out of respect for these people’s families and the judicial process.

However, the idea that we should be destroying the earth in order to create more expensive electricity than we can get from solar panels and wind turbines is absurd and should be put in the dust bin. The idea that we should keep subsidizing oil with trillions of hard-earned dollars is absurd and needs to be retired — we have better electric cars that offer strong economic benefits, a better driving experience, a more comfortable ride, less maintenance, less inconvenience, and other benefits.

The idea that we should be pushing deadly coal, oil, and gas on American citizens and citizens of the world is absolutely insane, and anyone promoting this should be identified as lacking good judgement, lacking foresight, lacking sensitivity to important matters, and lacking empathy. They shouldn’t be seen as fit to “lead the free world.” They are looking to pull us backwards — as even they admit — not lead us forward into a brighter, cleaner, more enjoyable future.

I don’t want to say such people would be horrible, horrible congresspeople or presidents, and that they’d make our country and our world much, much worse, but, well, we all know they would, right? We all know this, right? …

2016 Global Warming

Image by NASA

global warming emissions

Image by Tesla

 
 
Appreciate CleanTechnica’s originality and cleantech news coverage? Consider becoming a CleanTechnica Member, Supporter, Technician, or Ambassador — or a patron on Patreon.
 
Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

Advertisement
 
Written By

Zach is tryin' to help society help itself one word at a time. He spends most of his time here on CleanTechnica as its director, chief editor, and CEO. Zach is recognized globally as an electric vehicle, solar energy, and energy storage expert. He has presented about cleantech at conferences in India, the UAE, Ukraine, Poland, Germany, the Netherlands, the USA, Canada, and Curaçao. Zach has long-term investments in Tesla [TSLA], NIO [NIO], Xpeng [XPEV], Ford [F], ChargePoint [CHPT], Amazon [AMZN], Piedmont Lithium [PLL], Lithium Americas [LAC], Albemarle Corporation [ALB], Nouveau Monde Graphite [NMGRF], Talon Metals [TLOFF], Arclight Clean Transition Corp [ACTC], and Starbucks [SBUX]. But he does not offer (explicitly or implicitly) investment advice of any sort.

Comments

You May Also Like

Aviation

As global green hydrogen supply chain ramps up, Airbus dreams of airport hydrogen hubs to fuel zero emission flight.

Batteries

Wärtsilä is a 180-year old company that pivoted through technology changes leading to engines for marine power and electricity, and is now a storage...

Climate Change

Creative agencies that work with fossil fuel corporations are getting more legal scrutiny than ever. The reality is so obvious: fossil fuel companies claim...

Cars

You know something's screwy when Joe Manchin kind of makes sense.

Copyright © 2021 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.