Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Texas regulators have been playing ostrich when it comes to investigating the link between fracking waste disposal and earthquakes, sez US EPA.

Fossil Fuels

EPA To Texas Fracking Regulators: Your Slip Is Showing!

Texas regulators have been playing ostrich when it comes to investigating the link between fracking waste disposal and earthquakes, sez US EPA.

The Intertubes are buzzing with news that the US Environmental Protection Agency has smacked down Texas regulators for failing to publicly acknowledge that fracking and other fossil-related activities have been linked to a spate of earthquakes, particularly in northern parts of the state. According to our friends over at The Texas Tribune, the move seems calculated toward pressuring the state to take action.


fracking earthquakes usgs

Fracking Earthquakes, A Thing Since 1951

Speaking of The Texas Tribune, let’s hear it for Trib reporter Jim Malewitz, who unearthed a link to a 1951 U.S. Geological Survey report prepared with the Department of the Interior titled, “Earthquake Hazard Associated with Deep Well Injection — a Report to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.”

That may be a bit puzzling for those of you familiar with EPA history, since the agency as we know it today wasn’t formed until 1970, but here’s the cover shot:

usgs earthquakes 1951

If you have an explanation, drop us a note in the comment thread. Meanwhile we’re going with printer’s error, as it seems that the document posted online was re-printed as recently as 1990:

USGS earthquake report 2Where were we? Oh right, what the 1951 report actually said about earthquakes. Here’s the money quote from page 11:

Within the United States, injection of fluid into deep wells has triggered documented earthquakes in Colorado, Texas, New York, New Mexico, Nebraska, and Ohio and possibly in Oklahoma, Louisiana, and Mississippi.

Oh, snap!

The 1951 report also indicates that scientists have had a pretty clear understanding about that linkage for decades:

Investigations of these cases have led to some understanding of the probable physical mechanism of the triggering and of the criteria for predicting whether future earthquakes will be triggered, based on the local state of stress in the Earth’s crust, the injection pressure, and the physical and the hydrological properties of the rocks into which the fluid is being injected.

Meh, scientists — what do they know, anyways.

Texas And Fracking Earthquakes

To clarify, the 1951 report does not specifically nail fracking, the drilling method that involves getting at oil and gas deposits in shale formations by shooting vast quantities of brine underground. Although fracking has been directly linked to seismic activity in unusual cases, for the most part researchers are finding a more striking connection with the practice of disposing wastewater from oil and gas drilling operations of any type into deep wells.

Deep well disposal is what the 1951 report deals with, which makes sense historically because fracking was a relatively uncommon drilling method until the Bush Administration created a gaping loophole in federal water safety regulations. The EPA has been trying to play catch-up ever since, but without an Act of Congress the agency has had to tread carefully around the risk of lawsuits.

Meanwhile, regulatory authority has been tossed over to the states, with a predictable patchwork of results ranging from an outright fracking ban in New York State, to a wild ride in Oklahoma where hundreds of earthquakes have been giving local residents the jitters.

Last year, Oklahoma finally began acting to curb oil and gas wastewater disposal, and that may be what emboldened the EPA to light a fire under Texas regulators.

The EPA may have also decided to take the unusual step of embarrassing Texas regulators based on the findings of a US Geological Survey map of seismic activity released last spring. For the first time ever the map included human-induced hazards for the central and eastern US states as well as natural quakes nationwide. When those human-induced hazards are included, USGS concluded that “the chance of damage from all types of earthquakes is similar to that of natural earthquakes in high-hazard areas of California.”

“This research also shows that much more of the nation faces a significant chance of having damaging earthquakes over the next year, whether natural or human-induced.”


That includes Texas. While not nearly as seismically active as Oklahoma, Texas does place high in the human-induced rankings.

However, the Texas Railroad Commission (the state agency with jurisdiction over oil and gas wells) has been silent on the topic. That’s despite hiring its own staff seismologist in 2014 and requiring the industry to submit more data.

As reported by the Tribune, earlier this month the EPA evaluated the TRC’s response to seismic activity in the state and came to this conclusion:

“In light of findings from several researchers, its own analysis of some cases and the fact that earthquakes diminished in some areas following shut-in or reduced injection volume of targeted wells,” the Aug. 15 report states, “EPA believes there is a significant possibility that North Texas earthquake activity is associated with disposal wells.”

Aside from earthquake hazards, EPA also expressed concern over the potential for drinking water impacts in high-population areas:

“EPA is concerned with the level of seismic activity during 2015 in the Dallas/Ft. Worth area because of the potential to impact public health and the environment, including underground sources of drinking water,” the agency wrote.

Based on its findings, the EPA has asked the TRC to go back and do their homework, that is, to direct its staff to actually go look and see if there is any evidence linking the use of disposal wells to increased seismic activity in the state.

Stay tuned.

Follow me on Twitter and Google+.

Image (screenshot): via US Geological Survey.

Appreciate CleanTechnica’s originality? Consider becoming a CleanTechnica Member, Supporter, Technician, or Ambassador — or a patron on Patreon.
Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.
Written By

Tina specializes in military and corporate sustainability, advanced technology, emerging materials, biofuels, and water and wastewater issues. Tina’s articles are reposted frequently on Reuters, Scientific American, and many other sites. Views expressed are her own. Follow her on Twitter @TinaMCasey and Google+.


#1 most loved electric vehicle, solar energy, and battery news & analysis site in the world.


Support our work today!


Power CleanTechnica: $3/Month

Tesla News Solar News EV News Data Reports


EV Sales Charts, Graphs, & Stats


Our Electric Car Driver Report

30 Electric Car Benefits

Tesla Model 3 Video

Renewable Energy 101 In Depth

solar power facts

Tesla News

EV Reviews

Home Efficiency

You May Also Like


After 15 years of planning and development, the ShakeAlert earthquake early warning system is now available to more than 50 million people in California,...


Proposed Texas Senate Bill 1728 (SB 1728) will make Tesla and EV owners pay an additional $200 EV tax if passed. The claim is...

Clean Power

The transformation of a landfill in Houston into the largest urban solar farm in the United States will be a testament to the power...

Fossil Fuels

California will work to end oil extraction as part of nation-leading effort to achieve carbon neutrality. Action will halt issuance of fracking permits by...

Copyright © 2021 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.