#1 cleantech news, reviews, & analysis site in the world. Subscribe today. The future is now.

Clean Power

Published on July 12th, 2016 | by Joshua S Hill


Recent Policy Movement In Northeast US Could Start Offshore Wind Boom

July 12th, 2016 by  

Recent policy moves in the states of Massachusetts and New York could initiate a long-awaited offshore wind energy boom in the United States.

Offshore-Windpark alpha ventusThe global offshore wind energy market is growing rapidly, and at the end of 2015 was reported to have reached 12 GW — with several more GW in the pipeline. Europe unsurprisingly leads the way, with the European Wind Energy Association claiming it makes up the lion’s share of all global offshore wind capacity.

What continues to baffles many analysts, however, is the lack of development across the pond in the United States.

There was a lot of hope, several years ago, with many years of planning and policy seemingly about to come to a head with the construction of the 430 MW Cape Wind Offshore Wind Farm off the coast of Cape Cod in Massachusetts. However, plans for Cape Wind disintegrated, and the only project currently under construction in US waters is the measly 30 MW Block Island Wind Farm off the coast of Rhode Island.

There is hope that the state of Rhode Island will be a dominant driver of offshore wind energy growth in the years to come, with the state’s General Assembly recently signing on to an extended renewable energy standard that set a goal of generating 38.5% of the state’s electricity from renewables.

However, in recent months, several moves have been made that might see Rhode Island joined by east coast neighbors New York and Massachusetts.

New York Wind Energy Area mapIn early June, New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) announced that it would be participating in the US Department of Interior’s Bureau of Ocean Energy Management’s (BOEM) commercial offshore wind energy lease auction for sites off the coast of Long Island.

The move is described as “a critical component” of meeting New York Governor Andrew Cuomo’s clean energy goals, which includes generating 50% of the state’s electricity from renewables by 2030.

“Offshore wind will bring clean energy and economic development to New York’s coastal communities, growing the state’s economy and supporting Governor Cuomo’s commitment to protecting the environment,” said John B. Rhodes, President and CEO, NYSERDA. “Offshore wind offers our state great promise and NYSERDA is committed to ensuring this vast renewable energy resource is developed in a cost-effective way to augment New York’s energy infrastructure.”

The lease site is a 81,000-acre area located off the south coast of Long Island, off the Rockaway Peninsula.

Deepwater-1In late June and early July, the Massachusetts House and Senate both passed a bill (the Senate unanimously) that would the state to begin soliciting contracts for as much as 2 GW of offshore wind energy as soon as 2027.

The bill, which was drafted in early May, could help trigger a $10 billion development pipeline, according to Bloomberg New Energy Finance analyst Tom Harries.

Already, DONG Energy, Deepwater Wind, and Offshore MW have leases from the US Government to build in waters south of Martha’s Vineyard (see right), though Deepwater Wind is the only one in progress with the aforementioned 30 MW Block Island Wind Farm.

Tags: , , , , ,

About the Author

I'm a Christian, a nerd, a geek, and I believe that we're pretty quickly directing planet-Earth into hell in a handbasket! I also write for Fantasy Book Review (.co.uk), and can be found writing articles for a variety of other sites. Check me out at about.me for more.

  • nitpicker357

    ” 2 GW of offshore wind energy as soon as 2027″
    I know this is offshore wind, not solar, but this looks like a timeline for a nuclear plant. Isn’t this a little slow?

    • Bristolboy

      It does seem extremely slow by European standards. However, it needs to be remembered this is a completely new industry in the US so it makes sense to be prudent.

      Furthermore, offshore wind remains much more expensive than onshore wind. I suggest this difference in price matters more in the US where there seems to be more opposition to renewable subsidies. It is also the case that whilst in many European countries offshore wind is the only option to add large scale wind projects, in the US there is lots or space for onshore wind farms.

      • Sadie5412

        I profit close to 6.000-8.000 dollars a month from freelancing online. Those who are looking to work simple at home work for several hours every day from your home and make good profit while doing it… This is a work for you… CHILP.IT/dba5a53

      • Wanda8571

        I basically earn close to 6,000-8,000 bucks every month for freelancing at home. For anyone ready to complete basic computer-based work for 2h-5h /a day from your house and get valuable paycheck in the same time… Then this opportunity is for you… CHILP.IT/dba5a53

    • newnodm

      There’s been no great need for offshore.

      The NOAA transmission model optimization did not even find that off shore wind was optimal, IIRC. There’s a million square miles in the midwest that good for wind.

      Not that I have a problem with offshore in the northeast. The ability to plan gigawatt projects is what we need.

Back to Top ↑