BC Responds To Kinder Morgan Pipeline Recommendation

Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!

Originally published on the ECOreport.

As everyone expected, the National Energy Board (NEB) has recommended that the Canadian Government approve Kinder Morgan’s proposed Trans Mountain Pipeline expansion through the most populated area of British Columbia. The NEB believes the likelihood of a major oil spill “very low,” but “the potential significance” of such a spill “very high.” Kinder Morgan would be required to post calculations of the emissions from all industrial activities and those created during construction of the 1150 km (715 miles) pipeline.

If the Trudeau Government agrees and the project goes forward, the number of tankers carrying diluted bitumen out of the Greater Vancouver area could increase from 1 or 2 a week to 10. These are some of the ways BC responds to Kinder Morgan pipeline recommendation.
5017101696_73ce727104_o

Greg McDade, the lawyer for Burnaby, said the NEB hearings were a “flawed process.” His colleague from Surrey said they were “outdated” and the attorney for Squamish First nation told the Board its “process is deficient.”

As a perceived friend and political ally of Prime Minister Trudeau’s, some might expect Vancouver Mayor Gregor Robertson to be more circumspect in his response. Instead, he once again stressed there is little benefit and great risk:

“I am outraged today that the National Energy Board did not reject the Kinder Morgan pipeline proposal with a definitive “no.” Kinder Morgan’s proposal is a bad deal for Vancouver’s environment, and our economy. It puts our cost at enormous risk with seven times the number of oil tankers transmitting our harbour every year. Vancouver is leading the country in economic growth and our brand as a green clean and sustainable city, valued at $31 billion, benefits all of Canada. This project is not in Vancouver, BC, or Canada’s interest.”

According to Kai Nagata of the Dogwood Initiative, who was at the city’s press conference this afternoon, “The mayor went so far as to talk about heavy oil as a sunset industry, which is an analysis I share. He said we shouldn’t be investing this much time and energy in a debate over keeping this one industry alive for a few more years at the expense of so much that we have going on in Vancouver.”

“Our concerns for the potential negative impact of an oil spill on the local economy and the irreparable damage to our traditional lands and water is simply a risk too great to accept,” said Rueben George, spokesperson for the Tsleil-Waututh Nation, in a press release.

“While Canada ties itself in knots arguing over pipelines, the rest of the world is leaving us behind as it transitions to clean, green, economically stable energy. Pipelines and tar sands are not compatible with the climate leadership Canadians celebrated in Paris,” said Larissa Standie of Sierra Club BC.

“We need to make it absolutely clear that this pipeline is never going to be built. There will be protests, civil disobedience and massive opposition,” said said Peter McCartney of the Wilderness Committee.

Stanley Park seawall by Leonardo Stabile via Flickr (CC BY SA, 2.0 License)

Already Very Close To 1.5 Degrees

There are strong concerns about the emissions entailed by a further build-out of the oil sands infrastructure at a time when the extreme weather events associated with climate change (increased wildfires, droughts, hurricanes) are increasing.

A growing number of climate scientists are saying that the world’s average global temperature is already very close to 1.5 degrees above pre-industrial levels, if not already there.

“We have definitely reached 1.5 at this time. It will likely be awhile before that is the average temperature, but it is a fact that should be on the front page of every newspaper in the world. We’ve broken temperature records month after month. We are already barreling down on the target of 1.5 C,” said McCartney.

A recent study of historic tree ring data, from the University of Victoria, points to rising temperatures as one of the ingredients for a mega-sized drought in the province’s future.

When the ECOreport pointed this out to BC’s Environment Minister Mary Polak, at yesterday’s press conference (starts 3:09 in embedded Soundcloud audio), she responded:

“Having been a part of the International dialogue and and a part of the National dialogue, it is absolutely apparent to me, and it is to our government, there has to be significant action taken if we are going to protect our planet for future generations.”

BC’s Five Conditions

BC Legislature and the Inner Harbour at night by zemistor via Flickr (CC BY SA, 2.0 License)

She did not go so far as to suggest the Kinder Morgan project should be rejected outright and once again reiterated, “We will only support new heavy-oil pipelines in British Columbia if our five conditions can be met.”

When I asked what would happen if the Federal Government approved this project anyway (starts 12:42 & clarified 14:04), Polak replied, “One has to ask if they would be willing to overrule our five conditions. I do not believe that they would, nor have I been given any indication they would.”

These conditions include:

  1. Successful completion of the environmental review process
  2. Ensuring world-leading marine and land-based spill response, prevention and recovery systems are in place
  3. Satisfying the legal requirements regarding Aboriginal and treaty rights
  4. First Nations are provided with the opportunities to participate in and benefit from a heavy-oil project
  5. British Columbia must receive a fair share of the fiscal and economic benefits from any proposed heavy-oil projects. [3. telephone press conference with Environment Minister Mary Polak]

“I’m encouraged that British Columbia is in no hurry to approve this project. They understand this is a political hot potato and they are facing an election less than a year away. The timing is pretty sticky, in terms of having this land back on their laps after the Federal decision in December. So I’m not surprised that the province would try to put the brakes on this and I’m encouraged to see they consider themselves bound to the timeline of the Federal Assessment,” said Kai Nagata of the Dogwood Initiative.

British Columbia’s “Modified Process”

As a result of a BC Supreme Court’s ruling that the province “breached the honour of the Crown by failing to consult” with the Gitga’at and other Coastal First Nations on the Enbridge Northern Gateway pipeline, last January, British Columbia is proceeding with what Minister Polak called its own “modified process” assessment of the Kinder Morgan proposal.

It has already been in discussion with the pipeline company for several weeks. The next step in this process is for the province to issue a Section 11 order to set out the scope and process for an environmental assessment. Kinder Morgan will not be able to proceed until it receives an environmental certificate.

Two Supplementary Federal Processes

Tsleil-Waututh Canoe from Vancouver 125 - The City of Vancouver via Flickr (CC BY SA, 2.0 License)

“Today’s decision brings the process created by Harper to an end. (Prime Minister) Trudeau has created two supplementary process: a climate test, which is underway, and 3 person consultation panel. The panel will be consulting further with First Nations and affected communities, so there will certainly be room to be heard further there. The ultimate decision will be made by the Trudeau cabinet, and if they decide to go ahead, a challenge in court by the Tsleil-Waututh is inevitable,” emailed George Hoberg, Professor of Environmental and Natural Resource Policy at the University of British Columbia.

“The climate test they are proposing only considers the upstream emissions of the project, created by the tar sands, instead of the emissions from the oil which are much more significant.  … It seems like the Government has already made up its mind and this process they are introducing is an attempt to gain social license and restore credibility to a broken process,” said McCartney.

He added, “What I do think is people have to show up this summer and be absolutely steadfast in our opposition to this pipeline. It’s not the 1950s anymore and you cannot railroad a pipeline through over vast community opposition.”

57 First Nations

At last count, there were 57 First Nations that will be affected if this project goes forward, and a number of them expressed concerns during the NEB hearings.

“There was the Squamish First Nation,  Katzie First Nation, Kwanten First Nation and a number of First Nations from the Island. Some of them are less public, on the advice of their lawyers, because they don’t want to taint their chances in an appeal by speaking out about the process. Others, most notably the Tsleil-Waututh, are campaigning publicly. The depth of opposition is actually a lot deeper than you would get from reading the newspapers,” said Nagata.

McCartney is under the impression that most, if not all, Coastal First Nations are opposed to the pipeline proposal.

“There are at least 16 in the Lower Mainland that are. Every one of these communities has the option to say no and we need to respect that,” he said.

Let B.C. Vote

Click on image to access Let BC Vote Website
Click on image to access Let BC Vote Website

“This is one of these decisions that is too important to leave up to politicians. At maximum, these people are on a four year time frame and they are thinking about the next election. Whereas people in BC have to live with the consequences of this project for decades to come. This is a decision should be in the hands of First Nations and the people of BC, who have to live with the consequences,” said Nagata.

The Dogwood Initiative is preparing for the possibility that both the Federal and Provincial Governments will approve this pipeline project. It has already set up a website called Let B.C. Vote, from which it intends to launch a formal initiative to force a province-wide referendum.

Photo Credits: Sunset over English Bay in Vancouver (2010) by MLNelson1 via Flickr (CC BY SA, 2.0 License); Stanley Park Seawall (note anchored tanker to the right) by Leonardo Stabile via Flickr (CC BY SA, 2.0 License); BC Legislature and the Inner Harbour at night by zemistor via Flickr (CC BY SA, 2.0 License); Tsleil-Waututh Canoe fromVancouver 125 – The City of Vancouver via Flickr (CC BY SA, 2.0 License);Screenshot from Let B.C. Vote Website


Have a tip for CleanTechnica? Want to advertise? Want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

CleanTechnica Holiday Wish Book

Holiday Wish Book Cover

Click to download.


Our Latest EVObsession Video


I don't like paywalls. You don't like paywalls. Who likes paywalls? Here at CleanTechnica, we implemented a limited paywall for a while, but it always felt wrong — and it was always tough to decide what we should put behind there. In theory, your most exclusive and best content goes behind a paywall. But then fewer people read it!! So, we've decided to completely nix paywalls here at CleanTechnica. But...
 
Like other media companies, we need reader support! If you support us, please chip in a bit monthly to help our team write, edit, and publish 15 cleantech stories a day!
 
Thank you!

Advertisement
 
CleanTechnica uses affiliate links. See our policy here.

Roy L Hales

is the President of Cortes Community Radio , CKTZ 89.5 FM, where he has hosted a half hour program since 2014, and editor of the Cortes Currents (formerly the ECOreport), a website dedicated to exploring how our lifestyle choices and technologies affect the West Coast of British Columbia. He is a research junkie who has written over 2,000 articles since he was first published in 1982. Roy lives on Cortes Island, BC, Canada.

Roy L Hales has 441 posts and counting. See all posts by Roy L Hales

6 thoughts on “BC Responds To Kinder Morgan Pipeline Recommendation

  • I am a Canadian, and in looking at the map, I wonder why they don’t think of running a pipeline to Hudson Bay and building a terminal somewhere in Manitoba. With global warming and the northwest passage opening up, Hudson bay would be navigable most of the year. The pipeline running over flat prairie would be shorter and cheaper and easier to construct, and not be close to population or cities in any numbers. Leaks would be easier to manage on the flat land. And any tanker disasters in Hudsons Bay, were they to happen, would be somewhat easier to manage given that they would be on the windward (sheltered) side on the bay, and in a remote area.

    • You answered your own question. ” With global warming” caused by the burning of fossil fuels.

  • The toxic, tar sands should never be permitted to reach Burnaby, because there is no equipment to clean-up a spill. Remember the Kalamazoo.

  • On a different note, you have a 1998 and 2012 picture of wind farms in NA. But neither shows a single wind farm in Canada. Is that really correct? Or did you us USA graphics in a story about Canada?

  • Kinder Morgans reputation in Burnaby isnt exactly stellar. Might have something to do with this : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=07wlunwsEt8 Not to mention the dirty tricks they used to keep their expansion plans hidden, and the fact the former federal government gave the NEB carte blanche to do whatever they wanted, basically making them nothing more than a rubber stamp supplier for the oil industry.

    • That video is impressive. Who wouldn’t want a beautiful fountain like that in their neighborhood? /sarcasm

Comments are closed.