Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

CleanTechnica

Clean Power

Massachusetts Solar Net Metering Decision Is A Mixed Bag

Originally published on Planetsave.

House and Senate leaders in Massachusetts came to an agreement this month on raising the state’s net metering cap by 3%. A six-member House and Senate conference committee agreed on the bill’s final language late Tuesday, April 5.

As reported by PV-Tech and New England Cable News, this bill — H.4173 — comes after five months of negotiation, including a “solar impasse” which delayed more than 500 solar projects in Massachusetts worth $617 million.

Massachusetts state house shutterstock_306198380

The agreement is designed to make it easier to get credit for generating extra power from solar panels.

Utilities Voice Concerns

Utilities have voiced concern about lifting the existing caps, arguing customers without solar panels are helping foot the bill for those who use net metering. They add net metering payouts do not help cover the cost of operating and maintaining the electricity distribution infrastructure. Solar advocates argue that the wide-ranging benefits of rooftop solar power outweigh the extra costs for other ratepayers.

The compromise bill would allow utilities to impose a charge on solar users to help maintain the grid.

The final wording of the bill allows smaller-scale projects to benefit from higher-retail reimbursements rates – last year, the rate was around $0.17/kWh, according to reports. Commercial or community projects will receive a less favorable reimbursement rate.

“This legislation, H.4173, will allow dozens of community solar projects to move forward across the Commonwealth in the coming months,” said Jeff Cramer, executive director of the Coalition for Community Solar Access (CCSA). “That means we can put our employees back to work building local clean-energy projects, generate tax revenue for towns, and most importantly, give our customers the bill savings they’ve been waiting for.”

The bill will be returned to both chambers for a final vote prior to final ratification.

In April, a coalition of Massachusetts mayors and town managers sent a letter to lawmakers, warning that a change to a lower wholesale net metering rate could jeopardize planned municipal solar projects across the state.

The effort to raise the solar net metering cap is viewed as a large step in boosting the importance of renewable energy in Massachusetts.

Image via Shutterstock

 
Don't want to miss a cleantech story? Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!
 

Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.
Advertisement
 
 

Written By

is a writer, producer, and director. Meyers was editor and site director of Green Building Elements, a contributing writer for CleanTechnica, and is founder of Green Streets MediaTrain, a communications connection and eLearning hub. As an independent producer, he's been involved in the development, production and distribution of television and distance learning programs for both the education industry and corporate sector. He also is an avid gardener and loves sustainable innovation.

Comments

You May Also Like

Batteries

Hawaii is struggling to convert to renewable energy and has created an innovative residential battery storage sharing program to help make that happen.

Batteries

In a recent article, we shared the developing story of attacks on net metering policies around the United States, even in solar-friendly states. While...

Clean Power

There is a threat to clean energy that’s proliferating around the United States. In articles like this one, we’ve covered the story of several...

Clean Power

Georgia Public Service Commission votes unanimously to establish clean energy working group, but rejects expansion of popular rooftop solar program

Copyright © 2023 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.