Minnesota Legislature Proposes Two New EV Tax Rebates

Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!

Originally published on EV Obsession.

The Minnesota legislature recently put forward two new electric vehicle tax credit support bills — potentially offering buyers of plug-in vehicles a means of cutting the cost of ownership by several thousand dollars — according to recent reports.

Minnesota flagOne of the bills, HF 3513, would grant tax rebates of $2,500 for new all-electric vehicles (EVs), and $1,500 for new plug-in hybrid vehicles (PHEVs). The other bill, HF 2926, would grant a tax credit of up to $1,000 to buyers of electric vehicles, and to buyers of some renewable energy and energy efficiency technologies.

As far as HF 3513 goes, the funding for the tax rebate program would reportedly come from already existing solar energy incentive programs. The proposed rebates would expire in 2021, going by the current wording used. Notably, the bill would also require utility companies to develop public electric vehicle charging stations, which would further aid the rate of adoption.

The two bills — HF 3513 and HF 2926 — both have until the current legislative session ends (May 23) to make it through both houses.

State representative Pat Garofalo, R-Farmington — the lead sponsor of the measure in the House (and a Tesla Model S owner) — was recently quoted as saying: “It’s a win-win for everybody. Environmentalists get a lot less pollution and conservatives get less cost than the current program.”

As it stands, there are only around 3,500 plug-in vehicles on Minnesota’s roads — out of a total number of 4.6 million. So there’s certainly room for growth — which will no doubt pick up, regardless of incentives, as EV offerings continue to become more compelling.

(A hat tip to reader Joel Acker.)

Reprinted with permission.

Have a tip for CleanTechnica? Want to advertise? Want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

CleanTechnica Holiday Wish Book

Holiday Wish Book Cover

Click to download.

Our Latest EVObsession Video

I don't like paywalls. You don't like paywalls. Who likes paywalls? Here at CleanTechnica, we implemented a limited paywall for a while, but it always felt wrong — and it was always tough to decide what we should put behind there. In theory, your most exclusive and best content goes behind a paywall. But then fewer people read it!! So, we've decided to completely nix paywalls here at CleanTechnica. But...
Like other media companies, we need reader support! If you support us, please chip in a bit monthly to help our team write, edit, and publish 15 cleantech stories a day!
Thank you!

CleanTechnica uses affiliate links. See our policy here.

James Ayre

James Ayre's background is predominantly in geopolitics and history, but he has an obsessive interest in pretty much everything. After an early life spent in the Imperial Free City of Dortmund, James followed the river Ruhr to Cofbuokheim, where he attended the University of Astnide. And where he also briefly considered entering the coal mining business. He currently writes for a living, on a broad variety of subjects, ranging from science, to politics, to military history, to renewable energy.

James Ayre has 4830 posts and counting. See all posts by James Ayre

2 thoughts on “Minnesota Legislature Proposes Two New EV Tax Rebates

  • It is too bad that only some politicians have common sense, but guess a lot of them are only after money (from big corps), sadly.

  • ” As far as HF 3513 goes, the funding for the tax rebate program would
    reportedly come from already existing solar energy incentive programs.” I smell a BIG rat on this one. Take the money from existing solar incentive programs (which benefit homeowners with rooftop solar) and give that money to EV buyers (who will probably use grid produced electricity thus benefiting the Electric Utilities). This bill should have been described as an electric utility subsidy. If the MN legislature REALLY wants to support EV buyers AND the environment they need to find a different funding source-Like a special additional tax on gasoline or diesel fuel

Comments are closed.