Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

CleanTechnica

Cars

Does Tesla’s Q1 Volume Miss Portend Future Problems?

Originally published on TeslaMondo.

The nice thing about Tesla’s Q1 volume miss is that, like all quarterly data, by the time we receive the news, the conveyor belt of time has already moved it into the past. Since investing is about the future, Tesla’s Q1 miss should nag us only if it portends future problems. Does it?

screen-shot-2016-04-05-at-6-03-52-amIt’s hard to see how. Model X production is a problem solved. It’s down the conveyor belt. And Model ☰ production is a potential problem recognized and dissected years before it arrives on that conveyor belt. The company has talked about this very subject for over a year already. Of course, the deluge of orders is bound to put additional pressure on the company. Pressure isn’t good, although it’s a way of life for Tesla. Here’s a direct Musk quote from the 2014 Q4 conference call, about Tesla’s preparedness for Model ☰:

“We don’t want the delays that affected the X to affect the Model III. We’re really being quite conscientious about this. There are things we could do with the Model III platform that are really adventurous but would put the schedule at risk. So what we’re going to do is have something that’s going to be an amazing car but it won’t be the most adventurous version the Model III to begin with. But we will then have the more different version of the Model III, on the Model III platform, following the initial version.” 

Model Y might be the “more adventurous version.” Or maybe it’s just a super-duper ☰. Either way, Tesla has long recognized “it” as a potential repeat of Model X and has pushed “it” up the conveyor belt instead of trying to assemble maximum Shock/Awe right away. A good decision, since mild-mannered Model ☰ is proving to have more than enough S/A.

Glancing today’s headlines, reporters are having fun with a new vocab word: “hubris.” They apparently missed the 2015 Q4 conference call, during which Musk said exactly what he said yesterday:

“We put too many new features and technology — too many great things at once — into a product. In retrospect, it would have been a better decision to do fewer things with the first version of X, and then roll in the capabilities and features and new technologies over time . . . there was some hubris there. The net result, however, is that the Model X is an amazing car.”

Reprinted with permission.

 
Don't want to miss a cleantech story? Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!
 

Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.
Advertisement
 
 

Written By

We publish a number of guest posts from experts in a large variety of fields. This is our contributor account for those special people, organizations, agencies, and companies.

Comments

You May Also Like

Clean Transport

January marked an impressive rebound for Tesla’s stock, leaving some investors wondering what could come next. For now, many are appreciating profits as a...

Cars

The UK auto market saw plugin electric vehicles (EVs) take 20.0% share of new sales in January, flat from 20.4% year on year. Full...

Cars

Used Tesla vehicles have dropped in price in recent months, causing many prospective buyers to consider buying one with a lower price tag and...

Cars

In this article, I explain that Tesla has dropped its lease pricing so much that it costs the same to lease a Tesla Model...

Copyright © 2023 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.