Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

CleanTechnica

Clean Power

NPUC Votes In New 12-Year Solar Rate Plan

Unanimous NPUC vote rejects grandfathering proposal; will move all solar customers to new rates

On Friday, Nevada’s utility regulator voted unanimously to require solar homes to move to a new rate structure, one which sparked angry responses from solar proponents calling maintain their previous rates.

rooftop solar installThe new rates will be phased in over 12 years for all customers with solar panels on rooftops. The solar industry had lobbied to have existing solar customers “grandfathered” under the current rates for at least 20 years.

In documents filed last week, NPUC staff said “the subsidy has become unreasonable,” adding that the 12-year approach would give solar owners ample time to adjust to the new rates.

The commission’s Friday vote is a slight improvement from its decision in December to reduce the compensation solar panel owners receive when they export power they do not use back to their local utility, a policy known as net metering. The December decision sparked intense criticism by solar supporters and has triggered solar installation companies Sunrun and SolarCity to announce they would abandon their state operations and lay off hundreds of employees.

Opponents of net metering, which include many utilities, argue that it shifts the costs of maintaining the grid onto customers who do not have solar panels, even though solar owners also use it.

NV Energy, the Nevada utility owned by Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Inc, proposed a variety of options for existing solar customers in its public filings, ranging from gradual changes over four years to no changes for 20 years.

The commission “gave the monopoly utility more than it asked for,” said Lauren Randall, public policy manager for Sunrun. “This decision is clearly unjust and unacceptable for Nevadans. We will sue to overturn the anti-solar rules, and we will win.”

Gavel shutterstock_259913639The status of a pending class-action lawsuit remains undetermined. NV Energy, the Nevada utility benefiting most from recent net metering changes made by the NPUC, will now be a defendant in a class-action lawsuit filed by two individual PV system owners.

The two plaintiffs, John Bamforth and Stanley Schone, argue that they would never have invested in their PV systems had they known Nevada’s net metering program would be scaled back as dramatically as it has been since December 23, 2015

Image: rooftop solar installation via Shutterstock

Source: Reuters

 
 
 
Don't want to miss a cleantech story? Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!
 

Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.
Advertisement
 
Written By

is a writer, producer, and director. Meyers was editor and site director of Green Building Elements, a contributing writer for CleanTechnica, and is founder of Green Streets MediaTrain, a communications connection and eLearning hub. As an independent producer, he's been involved in the development, production and distribution of television and distance learning programs for both the education industry and corporate sector. He also is an avid gardener and loves sustainable innovation.

Comments

You May Also Like

Batteries

Tesla plans to invest another $3.6 billion to expand the Nevada Gigafactory to make the Semi and 4680 battery cells.

Batteries

On the surface, doing right by the environment may sound like a simple thing. Do things that are good for the environment, and don’t...

Batteries

Panasonic has agreed to purchase cathode materials and copper foil from Redwood Materials for its battery factories in Nevada and Kansas.

Batteries

Hawaii is struggling to convert to renewable energy and has created an innovative residential battery storage sharing program to help make that happen.

Copyright © 2023 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.