Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?


Clean Power

California Ratepayer Advocates Pushing Failed Arizona Proposals That Could Kill Rooftop Solar

Oct 15 Update: This article has been edited to remove paragraphs that do not line up with statements under oath.

The California Public Utilities Commission is currently in hearings over the future of net energy metering in California — Net Metering 2.0 for the sake of brevity. As you probably know if you’re reading this, net metering is a policy in 44 states that gives rooftop solar customers credit for the energy they provide to the grid.

rooftop-solar7Solar advocates love it because it makes rooftop solar a more attractive option to the average consumer and moves us toward a more healthy and sustainable environment. Utility executives and their millionaire lobbyists hate it because it keeps them from maximizing their profits. Of course, they don’t use that excuse publicly, instead blaming solar customers for ramping up rates for non-solar consumers. This argument is not only untrue, but also a losing strategy. States are expanding net metering across the country. South Carolina recently implemented it for the first time. Now Mississippi is considering it.

With the CPUC re-examining net metering in our state, big utilities have turned up the heat, and they appear to have hoodwinked a consumer advocacy group with a history of defending the policy into proposing solar charges.

The Office of Ratepayer Advocates (ORA) is appointed by the Governor with a mission to “obtain the lowest possible rate for service consistent with reliable and safe service levels.” As part of this charge, ORA “also advocates for customer and environmental protections.” In previous debates over net metering, ORA has been quite vocal in their support of the policy.

Now, they seem to have turned over a new leaf, falling (mostly) in line with proposals from PG&E, Southern California Edison (SCE), and San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E) that would impose new fees on rooftop solar customers far higher than a proposal by our old friends at Arizona Public Service that was recently withdrawn due to public backlash. ORA’s proposals don’t make a whole lot of sense given that their existence is inextricably tied to consumer rights.

This is very unfortunate. ORA is supposed to step up to defend ratepayers. Instead, they’re siding with millionaires. If Governor Brown is serious about taking bold steps on climate change, his administrative offices should reflect that.

Image Credit:

Appreciate CleanTechnica’s originality and cleantech news coverage? Consider becoming a CleanTechnica Member, Supporter, Technician, or Ambassador — or a patron on Patreon.

Don't want to miss a cleantech story? Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!

Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.
Written By

is an independent media strategist based in San José, CA. You can read his many musings on Twitter @pjallen2.


You May Also Like


In a recent article, we shared the developing story of attacks on net metering policies around the United States, even in solar-friendly states. While...

Clean Power

There is a threat to clean energy that’s proliferating around the United States. In articles like this one, we’ve covered the story of several...

Clean Power

Georgia Public Service Commission votes unanimously to establish clean energy working group, but rejects expansion of popular rooftop solar program

Clean Power

JACKSON, MS and WASHINGTON, D.C. — Yesterday, the Mississippi Public Service Commission (PSC) voted to adopt its updated Net Metering and Interconnection Rules. The...

Copyright © 2021 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.