Clean Power G20 renewable energy

Published on October 3rd, 2015 | by Tina Casey


G20 Energy Ministers Heart Renewables, Squash “Energy Poverty” Case For Fossil Fuels

October 3rd, 2015 by  

High-level energy ministers from G20 countries met for the first time ever last Friday, and if fossil fuel stakeholders were hoping for a show of support from that historic event, they got bupkus. While the fossil sector has been holding out cheap fossil products as the only way to relieve “energy poverty” in developing countries, at the meeting in Istanbul, Turkey, G20 ministers officially adopted a renewable energy toolkit that leads off with a program for reducing renewable energy costs among G20 countries and sharing low-cost technology around the globe.

G20 renewable energy

G20 101

For those of you new to the topic, G20 (Group of 20) is a UN-supported organization that includes the 20 leading economies in the world, which together account for more than 75% of global trade: Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Republic of Korea, Mexico, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Turkey, the United Kingdom, the United States, and the European Union.

G20 was formed in 1999 to respond to the financial meltdown in Asia, and the organization still has its hands full dealing with the aftermath of the 2008 debacle:

In 2015, the global economy continues to produce far less than it would have if the crisis had not occurred; there are tens of millions fewer jobs and global trade growth is still too slow. While always remaining vigilant to risks and vulnerabilities, the G20 is now more focused on improving the future of the global economy.

Energy Poverty & Fossil Fuels

Combined with an exploding global population, slow economic growth brings us right around to the “energy poverty” case that fossil stakeholders have been promoting. Here’s ExxonMobil CEO Rex Tillerson promoting the role of fossil fuels in bringing electricity to underserved communities:

These large-scale trends remind us all that energy demand is directly related to economic growth and opportunity. They help emphasize the critical importance of society finding ways to increase energy efficiency and reduce emissions. And they are a reminder that there is a humanitarian dimension and a moral imperative to expanding energy supplies for the sake of future generations.

In fact, our mission to expand supplies safely, securely, and responsibly is even more pressing when we consider the facts of “energy poverty” today.

Not for nothing, but Pope Francis also recently weighed in on the energy poverty case for fossil fuels and reached the opposite conclusion, so there’s that.

First-Ever G20 Renewable Energy Toolkit

The new G20 renewable energy toolkit is a voluntary one — its full title is “Toolkit of Voluntary Options for Renewable Energy Deployment.”

However, baby steps. The International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) emphasizes that the G20 meeting in Turkey marks the first time that renewable energy has ever been on the G20 agenda.

IRENA, which developed the toolkit, also notes that the stakes are high. According to IRENA, G20 countries account for 75% of global renewable energy deployment potential, so progress among G20 countries will have a significant impact.

You can check out a synopsis of the full toolkit here, but for those of you on the go, it anticipates that among G20 countries, about 40% of their total final renewable energy use by 2030 will consist of power generation, and about 60% will go to transportation and household use including heating and cooling.

As for developing countries, the toolkit envisions that the cost of renewable energy will continue to fall as G20 countries ramp up collaboration on technology and strategy. That will level what is now an uneven playing field for renewable energy costs within G20. Technology collaboration is also vital if renewable energy is to compete with fossil fuels in developing countries:

…G20 countries, based on their individual national circumstance, could expand the use and enhance investments in renewable energy technologies significantly, and share their good practices with developing countries.


…It needs to be ensured that innovations in such technologies become available to the developing world. In the absence of these technologies, renewable energy may not be considered as a solution to improve access to energy.


G20 Has More Bad News For Fossil Fuels

G20 countries still have an enormous stake in the global fossil fuel market, and the organization recently launched an investigation into the financial impacts of stranding fossil fuel assets as a consequence of greenhouse gas action. However, the consequences of inaction are already becoming apparent, and it looks like G20 has decided that the financial risks involved in shutting down the fossil fuel sector are quite manageable compared to coping with catastrophic climate change.

The new toolkit is just one part of the G20 energy ministers official Communiqué. The introduction to the Communiqué makes it clear that the world’s leading economies are engaged in steering a transition out of fossil fuels while addressing “energy poverty:”

…We welcome the progress made under the Turkish Presidency in addressing the Principles through the consideration of energy access, energy efficiency, renewable energy, market transparency, and the rationalization and phase – out of inefficient fossil fuel subsidies that encourage wasteful consumption, recognizing the need to support the poor.

To be clear, the Communiqué leaves plenty of wiggle room for fossil fuel development during this transitional period. However, this document aligns G20 countries with the goal of improving energy access while preventing the fossil sector from increasing its share of developing markets. G20’s priority region is sub-Saharan Africa, where the organization plans to work with the Africa Hub of the United Nations renewable energy initiative, SE4All (Sustainable Energy for All).

SE4All was launched in 2011 by Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon with a twin goal of reducing carbon emissions in developed countries, while introducing sustainable alternatives to common fuels used for heating and cooking in undeveloped countries, namely wood, coal, charcoal, and animal waste.

It’s also worth noting that companies and nonprofits are eyeing the home solar lighting market in Africa, as low-cost solar technology has begun to encroach on territory formerly held by kerosene.

The G20 ministers also endorsed the African Union Summit’s African led Renewable Energy Initiative as an effective strategy for reducing “energy poverty,” so right back at you, Rex.

Follow me on Twitter and Google+.

Photo via

Tags: , , , ,

About the Author

specializes in military and corporate sustainability, advanced technology, emerging materials, biofuels, and water and wastewater issues. Tina’s articles are reposted frequently on Reuters, Scientific American, and many other sites. Views expressed are her own. Follow her on Twitter @TinaMCasey and Google+.

  • Andrew

    Poor people in sub-saharan Africa need grid connections. Distributed solar power doesn’t free them from backbreaking wood and dung collection for horribly dirty indoor air-polluting cooking and heat, nor can it power any sort of industry that subsistence farmers desperately need to break free from their absolute poverty.

    • Bob_Wallace

      They could use grid connections but most are very unlikely to get grid connections for many years/decades or never. It’s simply too expensive to string the wire.

      With micro-solar they can have light, phone charging, radio/TV/laptop power, refrigeration, and fans very much sooner and for very much less investment.

      They also get clean indoor air.

      Cooking can be done with solar ovens and fuel needs can be greatly reduced with more efficient stoves. Cheaper than running grid wires.

      Many of the poor people you speak of could not afford electric heat.

  • Super and Easiest 0nl!nee Home opportunity for all. Make Extra Cash Every per month. All you just Need an Internet Connection and a Computer To Make Some Extra cash.Visit my dis profile….


  • Here is a way how you can earn fifty five dollars /hr… After searching for a job that suits me for six months , I started freelancing over this internet site and now I possibly could not be more satisfied. 3 months have passed since being on my new job and my income is around five-thousand $per month -Check link on MY_____-_____-PROFILE_____-PAGE_____ for more info

  • jburt56

    Nah, carbon will be here forever. Let’s return to the Carboniferous period with 20 foot tall ferns and dragonflies with 6 foot wingspans!!

    Just joking.

  • Peter Waegemans

    G20 energy ministers actually just met for the first time? Wait. What?!

    • mike_dyke

      It’s probably taken that long to synchronise 20 diaries!

      • wattleberry

        And muster up the energy.

  • JamesWimberley

    ” …about 40% of their total final renewable energy use by 2030 will consist of power generation, and about 60% will go to transportation and household use including heating and cooling.” Something wrong here. Power generation is not a final use.

  • Richard Foster

    Well, I can’t imagine that even 18months ago, something like this would have been mooted, never mind formally proposed and agreed on.

    The wheel is turning. And fast. And speeding up.

    Maybe there is hope…

    • JamesWimberley

      The general habit of consultants is to predict that growth in renewables will slow down, because of gravity or something. I did see a report here once of a team of analysts (were they at Citi?) that dared to envisage a scenario in which renewable energy deployment speeds up after it reaches grid parity. One of these approaches is consistent with Economics 101. Guess which.

      • Richard Foster

        Yes, I’ve never quite understood the predictions that show RE deployment slowing so dramatically in the next 10 years. Yes, I can understand that expiring subsidies and tax credits will make a difference, but when the cost of generation reaches grid parity (or lower), surely there is only one direction of travel.

        I think what we’re seeing is that predictions cannot keep up with the speed of development.

        Plus certain groups have certain vested interests…

        • Jan Galkowski

          Actually, Bloomberg had a study assessing the impact of withdrawing the U.S. federal tax credit for solar on residential PV installation. They found that it would slow for about two years, then continue unabated. Some of us think that in the context of the urgent need to zero Carbon emissions, throwing up any road blocks is stupid.

          Many people think solar is growing because of these things, and, no doubt, the incentives help make installing PV affordable. However, the case for residential PV is entirely due to its greater price efficiency, something which will only improve. Currently it sits at 100x that of natural gas, for heating, assuming ductless minisplit heat pump. That’s because 8x more efficient inherently, and 12x energy needs to be generated to produce the same heating effect, due to transmission and other losses. No doubt there are capital requirements for both the solar PV and the minisplits, and these are helped by such tax credits. That just means that without the credits the only people who will find these affordable are the wealthy.

          All this means is that when the day comes — and it will — that the fossil fuel and utility industry model is crushed by the marketplace, I will laugh and laugh and laugh at their owners and supporters. Unfortunately, a lot of people will lose jobs, but that will be due entirely to the management of the companies and the belief that things never change.

          • Bob_Wallace

            Some people in the industry have been arguing that solar subsidies are supporting higher installation prices.

            US end-user installation prices are higher than in some other countries. Twice as high as Australia and Germany.

            Let the subsidies expire and installation companies will almost certainly work harder to cut waste, bring prices down, and keep market share.

            It’s time, IMO, to move the subsidy money from solar in general and use it to target specific ways to increase installation rates. How about very low cost loans? How about zero cost loans? How about programs that guarantee 20% reductions in monthly electricity costs for low income homeowners? How about subsidies for states that don’t yet have well developed solar installation companies?

    • Essie Cordon

      last week I bought a brand new McLaren F1 after making $19427 this-past/4 weeks and-over, 18-k this past-munth . this is actually the coolest work I have ever had . I began this 3 months ago and straight away started making a cool at least $97 per-hour . Learn More At
      >➤➤➤➤➤➤ http://www.GooglesMoney11.Tk


  • Ross

    Getting rid of kerosene lamps can’t happen fast enough.

    • Calamity_Jean

      Amen! Kerosene is stinky, dangerous and expensive. Solar is safe and relatively cheap.

  • Martin

    The way I see it:
    Developing country: supply and install solar on school/community building, investment small, timeframe short, same goes for small wind turbine and small battery back up.
    Install FF generation, large investment, long timeframe.
    Any questions?

    • mary915

      I have been earning upto $5000 to $8000 each month since Last
      August by working online on my laptop for 5 to 8 hours daily. previously i thought
      the job will be tough but contrast to opinion it was too easy sometime i myself
      wonder how easy the job is for such a big money if You too are interested then

      > >
      > > > > > > > >


Back to Top ↑