#1 cleantech news, reviews, & analysis site in the world. Subscribe today. The future is now.

Air Quality

Published on August 6th, 2015 | by Zachary Shahan


$5.3 Trillion A Year In Fossil Fuel Subsidies Is Idiotic

August 6th, 2015 by  

Originally published on Gas2.

Ah, society — takes us decades to turn a simple, life-saving corner. Subsidizing fossil fuels in the 21st century has got to be one of the dumbest things society has ever done… (and we’ve done a lot of dumb things). We have cheaper alternatives that don’t kill us and cause all kinds of health problems and suffering beforehand. We’ve got locally available, renewable resources that don’t have us exporting billions of dollars a year to countries in the Middle East, Venezuela, etc. We’ve got zero-emission technologies that won’t fry our planet and burn much of the human race. But we choose to continue subsidizing dirty, toxic, expensive fossil fuels instead.

IMF-fossil-fuel-subsidiesThe G20 “wised up” to the idiocy and agreed two years ago to phase out fossil fuel subsidies, but a new study from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) finds that we continue to subsidize fossil fuels with trillions of dollars of citizen-earned cash. According to the study, the US dumps a ridiculous $700 billion a year on the dirty subsidies for the dirty piles of coal, gas, and oil. That’s $2,180 per American per year. Yep, aside from your electricity and gas bills, you are essentially sending $2,000+ to oil, gas, and coal companies because… because… well, they need our help, no?

Australia, where the recent G20 meeting was held, has its citizens helping these poor industries to the tune of $1,260 per person. The UK gives $41 billion a year, which comes to $635 per person. Developing countries Mexico, India, and Indonesia average $250 per person per year.

As a percentage of GDP, the subsidies come out as follows:

  • USA: 3.8%
  • Australia: 2%
  • UK: 1.4%
  • China: 20%
  • India: 12%
  • Ukraine: 60%


The world as a whole subsidizes fossil fuels with $5.3 trillion in subsidies per year. Subsidies included in the report go beyond simple tax breaks, direct subsidies, etc., and also include externalities (something I consistently argue should be done). Those include the pollution that causes innumerable health problems and premature deaths as well as the harmful effects of global warming and climate change.

If we were brave enough to cut these subsidies, the IMF estimates that 1.6 million premature deaths from outdoor air pollution a year would be prevented, about 50% of those that occur, and global CO2 emissions would be cut 20%.

It seems like common sense, no? Cut the damn subsidies. Stop giving companies trillions of dollars a year to kill us faster.

The UAE is doing it… somewhat.


  1. IMF Figures Show UK Government Still Subsidising Fossil Fuel, While Renewables Are Slashed
  2. The IMF Just Destroyed The Main Argument Against Clean Energy
  3. Fossil Fuels Subsidies Cost World $5.3 Trillion A Year – $10 Million A Minute
  4. Energy Subsidy Nonsense — Energy Subsidy Narrow-Mindedness Gets Old
  5. Oil Subsidies & Natural Gas Subsidies — Subsidies For The Big Boys
  6. G20 Leaders Agree To Phase Out “Inefficient” Fossil Fuel Subsidies
  7. G20 Supporting Fossil Fuels To The Tune Of $88 Billion



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

About the Author

Zach is tryin' to help society help itself (and other species). He spends most of his time here on CleanTechnica as its director and chief editor. He's also the president of Important Media and the director/founder of EV Obsession and Solar Love. Zach is recognized globally as an electric vehicle, solar energy, and energy storage expert. He has presented about cleantech at conferences in India, the UAE, Ukraine, Poland, Germany, the Netherlands, the USA, and Canada. Zach has long-term investments in TSLA, FSLR, SPWR, SEDG, & ABB — after years of covering solar and EVs, he simply has a lot of faith in these particular companies and feels like they are good cleantech companies to invest in. But he offers no professional investment advice and would rather not be responsible for you losing money, so don't jump to conclusions.

Back to Top ↑