Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

CleanTechnica

Carbon Pricing

NY State Carbon Tax Proposal Moving Closer, According To The Network For Sustainable Financial Markets

The earlier revenue-neutral New York State Carbon Tax proposal — led mostly by Sara Hsu of SUNY New Paltz and Mark Dunlea of the Green Education and Legal Fund — has now transformed into a combined tax credit and investment proposal, according to the Network For Sustainable Financial Markets.

The transformation means that the proposal would allow for tax credits to low-income groups, in addition to investments into the renewable energy transition; infrastructure investments intended to result in reduced carbon emissions; and climate change mitigation/adaption investments (sea walls, levies, etc).

New-York-saves-millions-RGGI

The transformed bill is currently the attention of the aforementioned leaders who are in the process of building a coalition to introduce the bill into the State Assembly. Amongst others, the coalition features a number of notable environmentalists, economists, and labor-related groups. The current aim is for the bill to be introduced this autumn.

Here’s a bit of background via a recent press release:

A carbon tax offers a market-based solution to climate-altering fossil fuel emissions. Increasing the price of fossil fuels, while protecting the poor, sends a signal to the market to shift from fossil fuel-based energy sources to renewable energy sources, which are steadily becoming available and declining in price. Implementing a carbon tax is a proactive way to combat extreme temperatures and more powerful storms such as Hurricane Sandy.

Carbon taxes are supported by economists and environmentalists alike. As Bill McKibben of 350.org stated, “for a quarter century, economists left, right and center have said we’d benefit from making carbon carry the cost of the damage it causes. This will strengthen New York’s drive to be a leader in the coming green economy.”

As it stands now, the Cuomo administration supports simply letting “the market determine how the energy system is transformed,” rather than direct intervention.

“The reality is that the present system provides a $30 billion plus annual subsidy in NYS to the fossil fuel industry because taxpayers and consumers have to pay for the environmental and health damage it causes. A robust carbon tax is a critical step to ensure that the real costs of burning fossil fuels is paid for by polluters rather than taxpayers,” stated Mark Dunlea.

Certainly true… It’ll be interesting to see if the proposed bill can be passed.

 
Don't want to miss a cleantech story? Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!
 

Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.
Advertisement
 
 

Written By

James Ayre's background is predominantly in geopolitics and history, but he has an obsessive interest in pretty much everything. After an early life spent in the Imperial Free City of Dortmund, James followed the river Ruhr to Cofbuokheim, where he attended the University of Astnide. And where he also briefly considered entering the coal mining business. He currently writes for a living, on a broad variety of subjects, ranging from science, to politics, to military history, to renewable energy.

Comments

You May Also Like

Clean Power

In January, the Department of Energy (DOE) announced that it launched the Clean Energy to Communities program, which will provide up to $50 million...

Clean Power

There are some serious advantages to offshore wind. Offshore winds are much more powerful than those on land, and they reach their peak during...

Clean Power

Ørsted used to be one of the most coal-intensive energy companies in Europe, and was dedicated to fossil fuels. But it decided in 2009...

Clean Power

This year is setting up to be an important one for offshore wind in the United States. Here are five key developments to keep...

Copyright © 2023 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.