Clean Power

Published on May 6th, 2015 | by Rocky Mountain Institute


Renewable Energy Adoption Rapidly Growing In Emerging Economies

May 6th, 2015 by  

Originally published on RMI Outlet.
By Laurie Guevara-​Stone

blog_2015_05_04-1A recent report from Bloomberg New Energy Finance and several partners shows that renewable energy adoption is growing in the world’s emerging economies nearly twice as fast than in industrialized nations. Not only are renewable energy technologies now cost competitive with fossil fuels in many developing nations, but they are often more reliable, safer, and at times cheaper than conventional grid power.

The report—covering 55 countries in Africa, Asia, and Latin America and the Caribbean—destroys the myth that fossil generation is the best way forward, and shows that the strides made by the private sector, government, and civil society have the potential to pave the way for an exciting market for renewables in Africa and beyond.

The top ten countries studied in the report with the best investment climate and policies for clean energy include large polluters like China, Brazil, India, and Indonesia, but also include smaller nations such as Kenya, Uganda, and Uruguay. The report looked at numerous indicators of what makes a country attractive for clean energy investment, development, and deployment, including a country’s policy and power sector structure, the level of price attractiveness for clean energy deployment, the expectations for how large the market for clean energy can become, the availability of local funds, the local cost of debt and green microfinance activity, the availability of local manufacturing and other similar types of capacity to spur clean energy projects, the level of policy support for carbon emissions reduction, and local corporate awareness of carbon issues.

Cost-Competitive Electricity

Some of the poorest countries in the world actually have very expensive and/or quite unreliable electricity. Their grids—with badly aging infrastructure—often rely on imported fossil fuels and even those with their own energy resources face shortages meaning routine brownouts, or worse, blackouts. (In countries such as Sierra Leone and Nigeria, the grid is down more than half the year, according to a Joint Research Centre, European Commission report.) Brazil’s drought is causing electricity rationing due to the country’s reliance on large hydro, and India’s coal shortage in previous years raised costs and closed power plants. When renewables such as solar and wind compete with expensive energy coupled with inadequate infrastructure, renewables reach grid parity and are more reliable and secure for populations connected to the grid.

The case is even stronger for the 1.3 billion people in the world without access to electricity. Many of these people rely on kerosene lamps that are not only costly—poor households typically spend 10 percent of their income on kerosene—but also an extreme health hazard. Access to distributed solar systems or other renewable technologies could not only bring cleaner, healthier, and more reliable power to rural areas, but can do so much more economically than trying to extend the grid.

The following four countries—countries in which renewables are growing quickly—exemplify why developing countries and emerging economies are investing in renewables … from greening their centralized grids to electrifying the billions of people still without access to electricity.


In October 2014 Brazil held its first solar-only energy auction, and the accepted bids for more than 1,000 MW of power—averaging $87/MWh—were among the lowest unsubsidized solar prices in the world and well below the peak wholesale power prices at that time of $400/MWh. Wind energy became the cheapest energy source in Brazil years ago, beating out both natural gas and hydropower.

Currently Brazil gets less than 1 percent of its electricity from solar (only 44.6 MW), 3 percent from wind, and over 70 percent from hydropower. But being in the worst drought in eighty years, the country wants to diversify its electricity supply, with a target of 3.5 GW of solar and 22.4 GW of wind power in operation by 2023, 20 percent of the country’s current generating capacity.


Solar energy in India is now cheaper than coal. And many utility companies in India are now realizing the business case for renewables over conventional power projects. Tata Power, the second-largest private sector power generating company in India, is looking to expand its renewable energy portfolio by acquiring 300 MW of wind projects in northwest India. And the country recently announced it intends to more than double its use of renewable energy, from 6 percent to at least 15 percent, by 2020.

Yet India also realizes there are many more benefits to renewable energy than alleviating climate change. The country already has over 1 million households and 10,000 rural communities using distributed renewable energy systems to provide them with basic electricity. According to a booklet the country produced for the climate talks in Lima, “Apart from electricity generation, the application of these technologies has benefited millions of rural folk by meeting their lighting, cooking, and productive energy needs in a decentralized and environmentally benign way.” Among India’s proposals are 25 more solar farms and 100,000 more solar pumps for irrigation and drinking water.


Although Kenya is the largest economy in East Africa, less than 20 percent of Kenyans have access to electricity. For people without access to grid power, often renewables are the cheapest option. Most Kenyans use kerosene for lighting, paying $0.92 per liter. For the average Kenyan family that makes less than $2 per day kerosene is not only a costly extravagance, but also an unhealthy and polluting one. This makes off-grid solar an economical and healthier choice. Around 744 buildings from health centers to schools have been hooked up to solar through Kenya’s 2009 Rural Electrification Master Plan.

The country also hopes to boost wind power generation by 630 MW. Kenya is already on its way with construction of the Lake Turkana 300 MW Wind Project spanning 40,000 acres. The project is expected to increase the country’s power generation by 17 percent, and be the cheapest source of power in the country after geothermal.


This small South American country generates about 45 percent of its electricity from hydropower. However, during dry periods, prior to 2013 the country purchased electricity from neighboring Argentina at up to $400/MWh, eight times the average cost of electricity generation in the United States. To avoid expensive imported fuels, the country embarked on a plan to install enough wind farms to generate 30 percent of the nation’s energy needs, at only $64/MWh. The installed wind capacity is now at 219 MW, and renewables generate 84 percent of Uruguay’s electricity. Because of cheap wind power, consumers saw a 5.5 percent energy bill decrease in July 2014.

Uruguay is also forging ahead with solar power, and the state electric company recently agreed to purchase electricity from a 50-megawatt solar farm at just over $90/MWh.

Smart Choices for the Future

While countries around the world experiment with renewables, many emerging economies are making it part of their long-term strategies for development. Demand continues to grow quickly—developing countries grew their grids by nearly 30 percent in the past five years, compared to 9.6 percent in OECD nations. And sub-Saharan Africa is seeing 300 percent compound annual growth in off-grid lighting.

This is thus a critical time for emerging economies around the world. Will their current dirty, expensive, unreliable grids be built out with fossil-fueled power? And how will they electrify the 1.3 billion beyond the reach of that grid? Encouraging examples and early successes from these countries and others demonstrate that distributed solar PV and other renewables could provide an answer, but much work remains left to do in the transition from fossil fuels to clean, reliable, affordable renewable electricity.

Image courtesy of Shutterstock.

Reprinted with permission.

Check out our new 93-page EV report, based on over 2,000 surveys collected from EV drivers in 49 of 50 US states, 26 European countries, and 9 Canadian provinces.

Tags: ,

About the Author

Since 1982, Rocky Mountain Institute has advanced market-based solutions that transform global energy use to create a clean, prosperous and secure future. An independent, nonprofit think-and-do tank, RMI engages with businesses, communities and institutions to accelerate and scale replicable solutions that drive the cost-effective shift from fossil fuels to efficiency and renewables. Please visit for more information.

  • sjc_1

    Capital investment barriers.

  • Coley

    The only real obstacles to a transition to RE are the embedded interests of the FF lobby and the associated graft and corruption.
    As their influence wanes in developed countries they will look to emerging economies to continue to peddle their wares.
    For an example of this kind of practice look at the tobacco companies.

    • JamesWimberley

      They may try, but how is this likely to work? Tobacco is sold to uninformed consumers, helped by addiction. Generating technologies are sold to investors with spreadsheets. The customers may possibly be bribed, but are very hard to con.

      For a real-world example, look at the slow implosion of the huge Galilee Basin coal development in Australia. The project was predicated on exports to China and India. The Chinese have just about stopped importing thermal coal, and India says it’s too expensive.

  • JamesWimberley

    The RMI is far too sanguine and uncritical about India. True, it has very ambitious plans for wind and especially solar. But it also plans to ramp up coal production and generation, bucking the global trend.

    How realistic is this plan? “Solar energy in India is now cheaper than coal,” writes RMI. Running down the link, the report is that Indian solar power is cheaper than imported Australian coal. Indian coal is cheaper. The difference is that you can actually have the Australian coal. The expanded Indian coal s based on the wishful thinking of Coal India, which has serially failed to meet its production targets, and with luck will continue.

    • Kevin McKinney

      India is a tough place to try to run–enormous scale and diversity on many different metrics, from language to politics to ethnicity, governance that’s uneven to say the least, and with huge educational deficits (despite a strong tradition of learning for parts of society.) Two nuclear-armed neighbors with, er, fraught relationship histories, full of complications. Religious unrest. Poverty. A young and dynamic population.

      Makes you feel a little sorry for Mr. Modi–though he certainly doesn’t seem intimidated so far.

  • Oscar Martín

    It is clear now that renewable are very cheap. But renewable are unreliable if used directly and needs other technologies to make it totally reliable.
    On very poor situations, people probably choose cheap and unreliable energy to simple things like charge mobiles, and little storage for very useful and little energy demand like efficient lighting or compact efficient refrigeration.
    On medium situations, storage is an option vs net balancing with hybridation with fossil.
    On density populations, storage now is probably more expensive that a mix of renewable and fossils with a energy network.
    But on medium/long term, energy storage wil be enough cheap to change the way we use the energy, and renewable+storage being cheaper than any fossil fuel, the role of the nets will change with homes with excess of power selling energy to high demanding places like factories.

    • Adrian

      Renewables are incredibly reliable: When the wind blows or the sun shines, they almost always work.

      The word you’re looking for is “intermittent” which is an entirely different (and mostly solved) problem in larger grids.

      • Oscar Martín

        My english is poor. I’m sorry.

        • It is very commonly how it’s stated, even among native speakers. Presumably because it sounds worse, or people initially talking about this simply weren’t careful with their language and then it just caught on.

Back to Top ↑