Europe’s Cities Pledge To Buy Eco-Friendly

Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!

Strangely and sadly, you won’t find this development covered much in the US news media, but it made a pretty big splash in the rest of the world. Yesterday (Thursday, March 26), leaders of 30 European cities met in Paris to announce common commitments to clean-climate policy. They signed a declaration devoting their collective purchasing power (annually, around $10 billion, or €9.2 billion at today’s exchange rates) to buy eco-friendly products.

The head count of the top 10 cities contributing (London, Madrid, Rome, Paris, Bucharest, Vienna, Budapest, Milan, Brussels, and Stockholm) amounts to about 25 million people. This is equivalent to that of the top 10 cities in the US, including not only New York (which is smaller than London), Los Angeles, and Chicago, but all 7 others down to San Jose, California, which has about the same population as the 10th European city (Stockholm). And there are 20 more on Europe’s list. Imagine the media ignoring the contribution of the top 10 US cities….

Europeam mayors meet on climate, late March 2015  (mayors-adapt.eu)

Said the European mayors:

“[The] time has now come for European capitals and metropolises to pool our efforts to tackle climate change. This requires a closer dialogue between cities through a more regular exchange of expertise and good practices.”

Europe’s mayors are all implementing policies that favor procurement contracts from green and low-carbon industries. They also cite the leverage effect on the private sector, which very often aligns its own requirements with those of government. In principle, the logic is similar to that used in President Obama’s executive order last week mandating the federal government and its supply chain to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

The international mayoral resolution comes just 8 months before Paris hosts the United Nations framework on climate change conference (COP21), which plans to adopt an international agreement on climate change response that is hoped to be binding and universal. This Paris accord would come after more than 20 years of only partly successful negotiations among the 190-some nations of the world, including the Kyoto treaty.

Coincidentally, the announcement follows by a week the news that Paris briefly attained the title of “most polluted city on the planet” because of an unusually dense smog cover that nearly obscured the Eiffel Tower.

For the worldwide Earth Hour tomorrow, France will extinguish the tower’s illumination for a few minutes, and other city lights for an hour. In a symbolic and now even more significant gesture, the City of Lights will be going dark.


Have a tip for CleanTechnica? Want to advertise? Want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

Our Latest EVObsession Video


I don't like paywalls. You don't like paywalls. Who likes paywalls? Here at CleanTechnica, we implemented a limited paywall for a while, but it always felt wrong — and it was always tough to decide what we should put behind there. In theory, your most exclusive and best content goes behind a paywall. But then fewer people read it!! So, we've decided to completely nix paywalls here at CleanTechnica. But...
 
Like other media companies, we need reader support! If you support us, please chip in a bit monthly to help our team write, edit, and publish 15 cleantech stories a day!
 
Thank you!

Advertisement
 
CleanTechnica uses affiliate links. See our policy here.

5 thoughts on “Europe’s Cities Pledge To Buy Eco-Friendly

  • It’s not JUST climate change — cities with that many lights really screws up everyone’s sleep, and harvard medical school research will hopefully make that clear.

    Climate change is great, especially when it’s going the way most people would want it (at least on this website), but what would help even more is just NOT using such bright lights, use less wattage lights and everyone wakes up more refreshed.

    Plus everyone in a city might have 10% more chance to see at least 30 or 40 stars at night.

    Oh, the research!
    http://www.health.harvard.edu/staying-healthy/blue-light-has-a-dark-side

  • going Solar and Wind does not mean lights go out, the gesture of putting out the lights is a wrong sign.
    must go together with
    Solar puts lights on

    • Yeah, but just because we CAN have everything on ALL THE DAMN TIME, doesn’t mean that it’s a good thing, all the time.

      Look up the “International Dark Sky association” cool group.

  • It is interesting that a lot of city’s and towns etc, because they are closer to voters,and some listen to votes, are ahead of higher levels of government on these things. 🙂

    But sadly some other ones are even more behind than higher levels of government. 🙁

  • What an excellent way to start the day. It is nice to be able to come here and get some good news to begin the day with. It is a long haul with many changes needed to get us to a cleaner world to leave for our children, but step by step it seems to be happening.
    Thank you Ms Dechert, and to you too Zach for keeping this site going.
    PS : and you too Mr Bob for keeping the comments sane.

Comments are closed.