Doomsday Clock Moves To Three Minutes, Blames Nuclear & Climate Change

Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!

Doomsday-2It is now “three minutes to midnight” on the Doomsday Clock, according to the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, which places the blame firmly on “unchecked climate change, global nuclear weapons modernisations, and outsised nuclear weapons arsenals.”

A Brief History of Apocalypse

As a lifelong history buff, the idea of the Doomsday Clock has always fascinated me.

Founded in 1945 by University of Chicago scientists who had been involved in the infamous Manhattan Project, the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists created the “Doomsday Clock” two years later in an effort to visualise the impending disaster of the time so that all could understand just how close to apocalypse we were coming.

The Doomsday Clock uses “the imagery of apocalypse (midnight) and the contemporary idiom of nuclear explosion (countdown to zero) to convey threats to humanity and the planet.” At the beginning of each year, the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists decide whether to move or leave in place the minute hand of the Doomsday Clock, in consultation with its Board of Sponsors, which includes 17 Nobel laureates.

As can be seen below, nothing brought us closer to apocalypse than in 1953, when the United States and the Soviet Union both tested thermonuclear devices within nine months of one another. (Interestingly, the world’s closest brush with apocalypse — the Cuban Missile Crisis — was over so quickly the Doomsday Clock did not have the time to be set to reflect the impending doom.)

Image Credit: Doomsday Clock graph by Fastfission via Wikimedia Commons

2015 Reaches Three Minutes to Midnight

The recent shift in time on the Doomsday Clock is the first time in three years the minute-hand has moved (when it was also moved closer, and reached five minutes to midnight), and the first time since 1984 that it has reached three minutes to midnight.

“Today, unchecked climate change and a nuclear arms race resulting from modernization of huge arsenals pose extraordinary and undeniable threats to the continued existence of humanity. And world leaders have failed to act with the speed or on the scale required to protect citizens from potential catastrophe,” said Kennette Benedict, executive director of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists.

“These failures of leadership endanger every person on Earth. Based on their observations, the members of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists Science and Security Board find conditions in the world to be so threatening that they are moving the hands of the Doomsday Clock two minutes closer to midnight. It is now 3 minutes to midnight.”

Ask your parents — you may even remember it yourself — and the year 2015 was once held as a vision of “the future.” Spend any time on Facebook at the moment, and you’ll be firmly reminded that this is the year Marty McFly is supposed to arrive from the past to find us living in a hover-boarding future.

I don’t think many people would have predicted that the Doomsday Clock would still be necessary, let alone inching closer and closer to apocalyptic midnight.

Then US President Ronald Regan annoucing the proposal for the Strategic Defense Initiative, America’s ballistic missile defense system
Image Credit via Wikimedia Commons

The last time the Doomsday Clock reached three minutes to midnight was when, as the Bulletin put it, “the United States began a major defense build-up that included the pursuit of a potentially destabilising ballistic missile defense system.” Unsurprisingly, “relations between the United States and the Soviet Union reached an icy nadir.”

“Every channel of communications has been constricted or shut down; every form of contact has been attenuated or cut off. And arms control negotiations have been reduced to a species of propaganda,” the Bulletin wrote then, in explaining why the hands of the Doomsday Clock had been moved to three minutes to midnight

Over 30 years later, and absurdly — as a result of unchecked nuclear weaponisation and the looming threat of irreversible climate change — we find ourselves back at the same place.

“Since the end of the Cold War, there has been cautious optimism about the ability of nuclear weapon states to keep the nuclear arms race in check and to walk back slowly from the precipice of nuclear destruction,” said Sharon Squassoni, a member of the Science and Security Board, Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, and director and senior fellow at the Proliferation Prevention Program, Center for Strategic and International Studies.

“Efforts at reducing global emissions of heat-trapping gases have so far been entirely insufficient to prevent unacceptable climate disruption,” added Richard Somerville, a member of the Science and Security Board, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, and a distinguished professor emeritus and research professor at Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego.

“Unless much greater emissions reductions occur very soon, the countries of the world will have emitted enough carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases by the end of this century to profoundly transform the Earth’s climate. The resulting climate change will harm millions of people and will threaten many key ecological systems on which civilization relies … We call upon world leaders to take coordinated and rapid action to drastically reduce global emissions of heat-trapping gases, especially carbon dioxide.”

Have a tip for CleanTechnica? Want to advertise? Want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

CleanTechnica Holiday Wish Book

Holiday Wish Book Cover

Click to download.

Our Latest EVObsession Video

I don't like paywalls. You don't like paywalls. Who likes paywalls? Here at CleanTechnica, we implemented a limited paywall for a while, but it always felt wrong — and it was always tough to decide what we should put behind there. In theory, your most exclusive and best content goes behind a paywall. But then fewer people read it!! So, we've decided to completely nix paywalls here at CleanTechnica. But...
Like other media companies, we need reader support! If you support us, please chip in a bit monthly to help our team write, edit, and publish 15 cleantech stories a day!
Thank you!

CleanTechnica uses affiliate links. See our policy here.

Joshua S Hill

I'm a Christian, a nerd, a geek, and I believe that we're pretty quickly directing planet-Earth into hell in a handbasket! I also write for Fantasy Book Review (, and can be found writing articles for a variety of other sites. Check me out at for more.

Joshua S Hill has 4403 posts and counting. See all posts by Joshua S Hill

4 thoughts on “Doomsday Clock Moves To Three Minutes, Blames Nuclear & Climate Change

  • Ridiculous article which has nothing to do with clean tech. If this was a place for historical fear mongering nutcases then it would fit right in though.

    • Of course this has to do with cleantech, it explains some scientists and others concerns that we have not utilized enough of it to prevent the coming catastrophe.

  • Wouldn’t a compete nuclear exchange be a positive event from a kinda pathological extreme environmentalist viewpoint? The target sites are generally urbanized locations already essentially wastelands to non human-centric ecosystems..Then when you look at Chernobyl you see that natural life is much more resistant to radiation than human civilization..It’s humans that feel they need for 80 plus lifespans most animal life is completely functional even muti generational within 10 years adapting and developing resistant to radiation along the way ..Ionizing radiation generally takes time mess up DNA. so it’s civilization and the requirement for long lifespans that are vulnerable..

    • Good point, but what tells you that the future dominant life form will be better for Evolution towards what…?

      My take on all of this:
      Life/Evolution on Earth around Sol has got another 1,000,000,000 years to get some safe distance between itself and the star to not go extinct. If it makes it, cool – if it doesn’t, so what – the universe(*) won’t care I guess.

      *) 1 billion galaxies with each having at least 1 million stars comparable to Sol with a pretty good chance of some of them having planets orbiting said stars that are hospitable to Life/Evolution of some sorts.

      PS: I’m a functional realistic living being, so the above is kinda theoretical.. personally I’d rather we survive and evolve and I’d like to see as much of this story as I can 😉

Comments are closed.