Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

CleanTechnica

Coal

Coal Companies Dodging Royalty Payments + Manipulating Government Subsidy Programs By Selling Coal To Themselves, Report Says

It’s now common practice in the US coal industry for companies to sell a significant portion of the coal that they mine back to themselves (through the use of subsidiaries) as a means of dodging federal + state royalty payments and maximizing the amount of taxpayer-funded subsidies that they receive, according to a new report from the Center for American Progress.

To give you an idea of what “a significant portion” means, it should be noted that roughly 40% of the coal currently being “produced” in Wyoming is now being funnelled through subsidiaries owned by the same company that mined the coal — rather than being sold directly to utilities, power companies, etc. This represents a roughly 17-fold increase in the use of this practice in the state since just 2004.

mountain of coal pic

This funnelling activity — often referred to as “captive transactions” — allows the companies to notably increase the amount of taxpayer money that they receive via the US Department of the Interior, as well as dodge tax payments. Hmmm…

The new report makes note of the fact that, altogether, five of the biggest coal companies operating in that area have created over 556 subsidiary companies to market/sell the coal that they mine. Almost humorously (might as well laugh about this), Peabody Energy actually owns ~242 such subsidiaries — some of which possess very distinctive names, such as “Coal Sales II, LLC”.

Climate Progress explains the convulted system that allows this to happen:

Under current regulations, coal companies pay royalties on the first sale to another company after mining coal on federal land. The coal then can be bought and sold multiple times until it reaches a final destination and is sold to an end-user, such as a power plant where it is burned for electricity. By building up hundreds of subsidiaries, coal companies have been able to sell to their own companies and partners, allegedly paying royalties based on an artificially low sale price. The CAP analysis presents evidence that captive transactions are common practice in the coal industry and regularly exploited to evade royalty payments and maximize subsidies.

In recent years, members of Congress and the state of Wyoming, along with many others, have called on the Department of the Interior to reform how it assesses royalties for captive transactions. Taking initial steps to close this gaping loophole, the Department of the Interior released a proposed rule yesterday attempting to halt the practice of coal companies intentionally dodging royalty payments through captive transactions.


 

“Increasingly, the major coal companies are selling Powder River Basin coal not on an open market, but to an elaborate network of shell companies that they own and control,” stated Matt Lee-Ashley, a Senior Fellow and Director of the Public Lands Project at CAP. “This gaming of the system is costing federal and state governments millions of dollars in lost royalty payments and giving the Powder River Basin an unfair advantage over other US coal producing regions.”

You can’t argue with that. Considering the large profits that the industry receives, as well as its maturity, you’d think that subsidies could be rolled back completely. But then, if so, perhaps in a few years we’d simply end up with something similar to the banking and auto-industry bailouts, wouldn’t we? Is it really too much to ask for the largest industries in the country to stand on their own feet?

Image Credits: Mounds of Coal via Shutterstock

 
Appreciate CleanTechnica’s originality and cleantech news coverage? Consider becoming a CleanTechnica Member, Supporter, Technician, or Ambassador — or a patron on Patreon.
 

Don't want to miss a cleantech story? Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!
 

Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.
Advertisement
 
Written By

James Ayre's background is predominantly in geopolitics and history, but he has an obsessive interest in pretty much everything. After an early life spent in the Imperial Free City of Dortmund, James followed the river Ruhr to Cofbuokheim, where he attended the University of Astnide. And where he also briefly considered entering the coal mining business. He currently writes for a living, on a broad variety of subjects, ranging from science, to politics, to military history, to renewable energy.

Comments

You May Also Like

Climate Change

Direct and indirect subsidies for fossil fuels reached an all time high in 2020.

Clean Transport

Originally published by NRDC. By Sujatha Bergen In a letter to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Majority Leader Steny Hoyer this week, 54 members of Congress...

Coal

A year after the last coal was burned at the Navajo Generating Station, Navajo Equitable Economy has issued a report card on how the...

Coal

Days before representatives of the G20 meet in Japan, a new report has been published by the Overseas Development Institute, or ODI, which reveals...

Copyright © 2021 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.