Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

A multinational research team has developed a graphene wrapped, porous carbon "bridge" for lithium-sulfur batteries, which could leave lithium-ion behind.


Graphene Could Kill Lithium-Ion Batteries

A multinational research team has developed a graphene wrapped, porous carbon “bridge” for lithium-sulfur batteries, which could leave lithium-ion behind.

Don’t break out the widow’s weeds just yet, but it looks like momentum is building for energy storage to move past the lithium-ion phase and get into the more powerful territory of lithium-sulfur technology. In the latest development, a multinational research team has figured out how to overcome a major obstacle in the path of lithium-sulfur energy storage, by using graphene as a “bridge” between different components.

In theory, lithium sulfur (Li-S) batteries possess far greater energy density than the familiar lithium-ion (Li-ion), so breaking the technology out of the lab and into commercial development could have huge clean tech implications for EV battery range and energy storage for solar and wind sources, among other applications.

graphene Li S energy storage

Schematic of 3-D hierarchically structured graphene-sulfur/carbonZIF8-D composite ( by K.Xi/Cambridge via

Lithium-Sulfur Energy Storage

Sulfur is super-cheap, which is mainly why researchers are interested in developing energy storage devices incorporating the material.

Sulfur also has some bonus attributes compared to conventional Li-ion battery technology, such as a high tolerance for overcharging, relatively light weight, and low toxicity.

However, sulfur opens up a can of worms. One problem is that in conventional Li-S batteries, the liquid electrolytes acts by dissolving the Li-S compound, which necessarily makes for a short-lived battery.

In other words, sulfur is brittle.


Last year, researchers at the Energy Department’s Oak Ridge National Laboratory came up with an answer for that based on a unique electrolyte and a new class of solid sulfur-based materials.

The University of Arizona has also been tinkering around with Li-S energy storage, and has come up with a process for converting waste sulfur from industrial processes into a lightweight, solid compound with potential use in EV batteries.

So, What’s Wrong With Lithium-Ion?

The latest development was published earlier this month by researchers from the University of Cambridge and the Bejing Institute of Technology, in the AIP journal APL Materials, where you can find it under the title, “Graphene-wrapped sulfur/metal organic framework-derived microporous carbon composite for lithium sulfur batteries.”

According to the research team, the established specific energy density of Li-ion batteries weighs in at 130-220 Wh kg – 1, which looks pretty good but not when you consider that at least in theory, Li-S batteries can get up into the 2,600 range.

As described in the paper, Li-ion batteries are typically hampered by the use of a graphite anode and a cobalt oxide cathode. In contrast, Li-S batteries use a pure lithium anode and a sulfur cathode (for those of you new to the topic, the anode and cathode are the two parts of the battery that collect and discharge the current, which is stored in the electrolyte).

The team points out that even though Li-S technology is still in the prototype state, samples are already developed that achieve an energy density in the 150-220 range.

The Graphene Solution For Sulfur

As for the sulfur degradation problem, here’s how the team sums it up:

…S is lost by dissolving in the solvent and further by shuttling away from the cathode and even more by reacting with the Li anode…The shuttle mechanism has been directly implicated as the cause for low S utilization following the initial discharge, which is exacerbated in subsequent charge-discharge cycle.

That’s not all. The team also identifies other obstacles stemming from the use of sulfur, including poor conductivity.

One promising solution is the use of porous carbon as a protective “host” for sulfur in the cathod, specifically carbonized metal-organic frameworks (MOFs).

The team took the MOF ball and ran with it, as explained by Cambridge’s Kai Xi:

Our carbon scaffold acts as a physical barrier to confine the active materials within its porous structure. This leads to improved cycling stability and high efficiency.

This is where graphene comes in. Typical MOFs have a relatively low capacity, and previous research has shown that a nice shot of graphene can overcome that obstacle.

The graphene energy storage solution, as described in the team’s press materials, consists of wrapping the sulfur-carbon unit in graphene sheets:

Fast charge-transfer kinetics are made possible by an interconnected graphene network with high electrical conductivity, according to the team. Their work shows that the composite structure of a porous scaffold with conductive connections is a promising electrode structure design for rechargeable batteries.

So, now what? The next step will be to develop new electrolytes and tweak the lithium “protection layers” for increased efficiency.

They better act fast. Just last year, researchers from the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory announced the development of a Li-S battery based on a new material they’re calling sulfur-graphene oxide.

They’ve already demonstrated a Li-S battery that has double the specific energy of Li-ion, and it exhibits minimal decay even after 1,500 charge-discharge cycles.

The Berkeley team is eyeballing the new technology to develop a low cost electric vehicle battery in the 300 mile range, so stay tuned.

Follow me on Twitter and Google+.

I don't like paywalls. You don't like paywalls. Who likes paywalls? Here at CleanTechnica, we implemented a limited paywall for a while, but it always felt wrong — and it was always tough to decide what we should put behind there. In theory, your most exclusive and best content goes behind a paywall. But then fewer people read it! We just don't like paywalls, and so we've decided to ditch ours. Unfortunately, the media business is still a tough, cut-throat business with tiny margins. It's a never-ending Olympic challenge to stay above water or even perhaps — gasp — grow. So ...
If you like what we do and want to support us, please chip in a bit monthly via PayPal or Patreon to help our team do what we do! Thank you!
Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!

Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

Written By

Tina specializes in military and corporate sustainability, advanced technology, emerging materials, biofuels, and water and wastewater issues. Views expressed are her own. Follow her on Twitter @TinaMCasey and Google+.


You May Also Like


Recurrent uses data collected from subscribers to analyze the performance of EV batteries. The news is quite good.


Farmers don't buy spraying drones or hire drone spraying services because of the environmental benefits, of course. They don't need to justify the use...

Clean Transport

What can be done to minimize EV's impact on the grid? A recent MIT study concludes that coordinated BEV charging is a potential tool...


Honda and Volkswagen are moving forward with plans to manufacture more electric cars for their customers in world markets.

Copyright © 2023 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.