CleanTechnica is the #1 cleantech news & analysis site in the world. Subscribe today!The future is now.


Clean Power wave power navy stingray 1

Published on November 30th, 2014 | by Tina Casey

7

US Navy Shells Out 3 Million Clams For Wave Energy

November 30th, 2014 by  


It’s been a while since we checked into the US Navy wave energy test site in Hawaii, but our friends over at Columbia Power Technologies steered us in that direction to check out their new StingRAY wave energy converter. The device, which is slated for utility-scale wave energy generation, will get its first full open-water demo at the facility. The US Navy has funded the project through its Naval Facilities and Engineering Command to the tune of $3 million.

Those of you familiar with wave energy (and its sister, tidal energy) know that this emerging alternative energy field is fraught with challenges, especially when you’re talking about utility-scale development. While the kinks are being worked out you’re going to see a lot of variation in design, so let’s take a look and see how Columbia Power’s StingRAY works that out.

wave power navy stingray 1

StingRAY wave energy converter (courtesy of Columbia Power).

Wave Energy From Columbia Power

Basically, wave energy converters rely on the natural movement of waves to drive a piston up and down, move a drive shaft, or stir up some other form of mechanical motion. The mechanical energy gets converted to electricity by a generator and there you have it.

That sounds simple enough, but aside from Scotland, which seems to have taken the ball and run with it, the global wave energy field hasn’t been keeping up with other forms of alternative energy, most notably wind and solar.

That could be about to change. The wave energy field seems to be taking some lessons learned from wind energy, as demonstrated by the StingRAY wave energy converter. The heart of the converter is a direct-drive system that eliminates excess moving parts, along with permanent magnet generators.

 

The StingRAY is built from corrosion-resistant composite materials, and it is designed with modularity in mind to reduce the cost of maintenance and repair. Also helping to build in efficiencies and lower costs is a single-point mooring system.

wave energy stingray navy 3

Courtesy of Columbia Power

The spars (the long poles in the schematic above) and the floats behave independently as each wave passes, enabling the floats to rotate freely. As they rotate, they move a drive shaft connected to a generator.

There are two generators, one for each float, located in the section marked “PTO Modules.” That section, as in the wind energy field, is called the nacelle.

The generators convert the energy to electricity, which is then stabilized for grid compatibility before being sent off the device via cable. Columbia Power envisions an offshore “substation” to assemble the electricity from multiple devices before sending it to the grid.

From Wind Farms To Wave Energy Farms

The StingRAY was designed with an eye toward avoiding some of the aesthetic concerns that can bedevil offshore wind farms, most notably in the case of the Cape Wind project off the coast of Massachusetts.

As you can see from the photo, and the “waterline” indication on the schematic, the StingRAY has a low above-water profile, which is practically nothing when compared to offshore wind turbines. The system was designed for deployment in depths of more than 60 meters, typically located at least a mile or more offshore.

Don’t hold your breath for the full scale demo project to hit the water — it’s slated for 2016 — but in the meantime you can check out more projects at the Navy’s Wave Energy Test Site (WETS — cute, right?).

More And Better Wave Power

We’ve also been following a company called Ocean Power Technologies, which is developing its PowerBuoy with the help of the Navy and Energy Department.

Last we heard, the PowerBuoy was getting a wave energy workout off the Oregon coast, and last month the company announced that it was launching a new test site off the New Jersey coast.

We wonder if Ocean Power knows what it’s getting into, give the state’s recent history of obstructing offshore wind development.

Who knows, maybe they’re figuring to sneak into the water while state energy regulators are distracted by the wind energy thing. The company already has its APB 350 PowerBuoy wave energy model operating 20 miles off the New Jersey coast in collaboration with NOAA. It was developed in partnership with the US Navy and was deployed by the US Coast Guard.

The company’s PB40 PowerBuoy was shipped out from its manufacturing facility in Spain some time around October 20 and it has probably made its way to port in Bayonne by now. We’re guessing its final destination is off the coast of Atlantic City, where a prototype of the PB40 PowerBuoy was tested from 2003 to 2008.

Just to spice things up a bit, let’s note that the PB40 test project was supported in part by New Jersey’s Board of Public Utilities. That would be the same outfit that just put the kibosh on a long-planned offshore wind farm at Atlantic City, so hold on to your hats.

Follow me on Twitter and Google+.






Complete our 2017 CleanTechnica Reader Survey — have your opinions, preferences, and deepest wishes heard.

Check out our 93-page EV report, based on over 2,000 surveys collected from EV drivers in 49 of 50 US states, 26 European countries, and 9 Canadian provinces.

Tags: , , , ,


About the Author

specializes in military and corporate sustainability, advanced technology, emerging materials, biofuels, and water and wastewater issues. Tina’s articles are reposted frequently on Reuters, Scientific American, and many other sites. Views expressed are her own. Follow her on Twitter @TinaMCasey and Google+.



  • KevinGLB

    This would be a better design if the barrel could rotate completely and the aft was a collapsible fin. Fully submerged and out of sight to the most efficient height.

  • Peter in Oz

    Australia’s Carnegie Wave Energy platform is arguably one of the best ocean energy platforms that has been and continues to be developed. Not only does it produce baseload power but it can also deliver desalinated water at the same time. Its major appeal I feel is the fact that the whole platform resides completely below the ocean surface. Check it out.

    • Wayne Williamson

      Couldn’t find any links that show it actually is doing anything…please provide if you have them…

  • JamesWimberley

    The psychology of “aesthetic” objections to renewable energy is odd. It is extraordinarily variable around the globe. NIMBY objections to onshore wind are strong in England, negligible in Scotland, Spain and Germany. For offshore wind, they are strong in New England, negligible in Europe (though a project off the English South Downs, a beauty spot, had to be scaled back). There are curiously few objections in England to rural solar farms – Scotland is irrelevant here. Cynically, there seems to be a negative correlation with money. Rents, jobs and local taxes soothe hurt eyes a lot. In England Mrs Thatcher nationalised business property taxes in her war with Labour local authorities, but not in Scotland, shifting the balance of interests against development. One reason Silicon Fen around Cambridge concentrates on IP (ARM, Dolby) is the hostility of local planning committees to new factories.

    Wave energy? We’ve said it all before. It’s offshore wind energy with a time lag. Wind has made it to gigawatt-scale installation, and is now on a proper learning curve, while wave is stuck at clever pilot projects. It’s worth keeping research funding going at low levels.

    • leonlara07

      Here are some amazing deals that Amazon is offering. I found this website that has a hand picked list of best Amazon deals currently available…. http://WWW.247-JOB.COM

    • Larmion

      For your last paragraph: I completely agree with you when it comes to energy production for civilian purposes. However, the military (and certain branches of industry) regularly find themselves in a situation where they have to establish power in a remote outpost quickly and with limited logistics.

      The buoy-type devices used in wave power fit that bill nicely: they can be put on a supply ship and be installed on site with less effort and equipment than a large wind turbine for example. Hence, I can see why the navy is interested.

      Wave power offers promise for that sort of small scale, remote applications, but not for large scale commercial facilities. And there’s nothing wrong with that, niche products can be hugely profitable.

      • Michael G

        Agree – Navy goes everywhere – think Aleutians, Wake Island, Artic & Antartic, Magellan Straits, etc. …

Back to Top ↑