Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?


Clean Power

Utility Pricing Must Keep Pace With Grid Evolution: e-Lab Report

A report released moments ago by the Electricity Innovation Lab and the Rocky Mountain Institute indicates that fine-tuning electric utility pricing to reflect a more diverse grid will benefit the utilities, customers, and third-party providers. Rate Design for the Distribution Edge: Electricity Pricing for a Distributed Resource Future offers succinct analysis and answers as distributed energy investments continue to add robustness to the rapidly evolving 21st century grid.

The e-Lab participants say that today’s block volumetric prices conceal key aspects of the electricity system from DER decisionmakers and at the consumer end. Most noteworthy: the importance of timing in producing and delivering electricity.

Utility pricing should reflect a diverse, smart, and sustainable power grid (

A diverse, distributed, sustainable power grid developed by UC Riverside researchers, the university’s Physical Plant staff, government, and industry (

Block prices worked in the past when electricity sources were monolithic, confined to large utilities. That type of utility pricing is much less appropriate now that affordable distributed resources are filling previously unmet needs and quickly expanding our ways of handling electricity.

Over time, e-Lab consultants report, we can deploy and manage distributed energy resource investments in ways that create more value for all electricity stakeholders. Tweaking price signals to reflect costs and benefits more reliably can bring us to this point. More sophisticated utility pricing will better capture intrinsic value and foster grid flexibility and further innovation.

The e-Lab report identifies three opportunities for utilities and regulators to move from the existing and unwieldy turnkey pricing system to one that better reflects technology advances and more closely meets customer needs:

  • Attribute unbundling—Breaking apart a bundled kilowatt-hour into cost- and value-based components such as energy, capacity, and ancillary services
  • Time-based pricing—Allowing consumers more flexibility with power decisions by increasing transparency about the time-varying costs of electricity production and delivery
  • Location-based pricing—Shifting to pricing that better directs DER deployment to locations on the grid where they can deliver the greatest value

These more sophisticated rate structures complement increasing utility and third-party innovations with smart devices and automated controls.

As the one-way utility-customer relationship transitions to a two- or three-party exchange, forward-thinking utilities can assure greater value for themselves by developing new rate structures that reflect the fast-evolving changes in the grid. Increasing the sophisticated pricing of grid resources will better direct investment from utilities, third-party technology providers, and customers themselves.

It’s a given that developing and implementing new utility pricing will require sound collaboration among these three groups and the regulators set up to assist them. “The stakes are high in getting the transition to new pricing structures right,” says RMI Managing Director James Newcomb. He points out that outside investments by DERs and customers rely on the price signals provided by the utility. Existing rate structures are so bulky that they cannot adequately reflect either technological advances or changing social priorities.

e-Lab’s Rate Design for the Distribution Edge: Electricity Pricing for a Distributed Resource Future report is available for download here. Its bottom line: collaborating stakeholders can work together toward a shared vision of the future. New pricing structures will enable DERs to bring increased value to customers and the system as a whole.

*A diverse working group of thought leaders and decisionmakers from the U.S. electricity sector, e-Lab addresses the economic deployment and integration of US distributed resources. The long-established Rocky Mountain Institute supports its efforts by facilitating e-Lab meetings and producing actionable work products on its behalf.

Appreciate CleanTechnica’s originality and cleantech news coverage? Consider becoming a CleanTechnica Member, Supporter, Technician, or Ambassador — or a patron on Patreon.
Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

Written By

covers environmental, health, renewable and conventional energy, and climate change news. She's currently on the climate beat for Important Media, having attended last year's COP20 in Lima Peru. Sandy has also worked for groundbreaking environmental consultants and a Fortune 100 health care firm. She writes for several weblogs and attributes her modest success to an "indelible habit of poking around to satisfy my own curiosity."


#1 most loved electric vehicle, solar energy, and battery news & analysis site in the world.


Support our work today!

Power CleanTechnica: $3/Month

Tesla News Solar News EV News Data Reports




Tesla News

EV Reviews

Home Efficiency

You May Also Like

Climate Change

Preparing for emergencies and preventing disasters requires planning, equipment and communications. This is true for fighting fires and for keeping the electric power system...

Climate Change

With a unanimous decision, the Colorado Public Utilities Commission (PUC) has approved Xcel’s plan to accelerate the end of coal in the state. The...


Tesla’s US Energy Markets Policy Lead, Arushi Sharma Frank, was recently asked to testify at a Public Utility Commission of Texas Open Meeting. A...

Clean Power

Originally published by Union of Concerned Scientists, The Equation. By Mike Jacobs Space missions are a federal matter, but states determine energy policy and infrastructure...

Copyright © 2021 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.