Clean Power North Carolina gears up to permit natural gas fracking

Published on July 23rd, 2014 | by Silvio Marcacci


Are Utilities About To Kill Solar Energy’s Future In North Carolina?

July 23rd, 2014 by  

North Carolina has become one of the hottest states in America for solar power, ranking third in the nation for new photovoltaic installations in fourth quarter 2013 and first quarter 2014. But a regulatory fight pitting solar industry against big utilities is underway, and it could effectively end new utility-scale solar additions.

Every two years, the North Carolina Utilities Commission reviews how it calculates the “avoided costs” (the amount utilities would have to pay to generate or buy electricity elsewhere) of clean energy.

This time though, regulators are reviewing both avoided costs and the maximum size of renewable generation systems eligible for standard pricing – a regulatory process that could “have the effect of significantly reducing, if not eliminating” new solar installations in North Carolina.

North Carolina gears up to permit natural gas fracking

North Carolina postcard image via CleanTechnica

Solar Energy Project Prices, Size At Risk

The value of avoided costs has dictated standard prices North Carolina utilities pay to renewable energy projects through power purchase agreements (PPA) – a big deal for renewable energy projects in a monopoly electricity market where just a few utilities are guaranteed a majority of power customers and renewable developers must go through individual utilities to sell electricity on the state’s grid.

By establishing standard prices for long-term PPAs, developers can avoid long negotiations that may derail potential solar projects, and are given leverage with the much larger utilities. Long-term PPAs (North Carolina requires 15-year standard contracts) are contracts widely used in the power industry to lock in pricing so solar developers can know their payback terms and secure financing for new projects.

solar power investment image

Solar energy investment image via CleanTechnica

Without them, utilities could theoretically lower the price they pay for power, leaving developers owing money to lenders, and gaining monopoly control over solar development. State utilities advocate for cutting contracts to 10 years, while the solar industry is pushing for regulators to extend contracts to 20 years.

But in addition to reconsidering avoided costs, North Carolina regulators are also reviewing project size limits for “qualifying facilities.” Currently installations of up to five-megawatt (MW) capacity are covered – enough for a large, commercial-scale installation.

State utilities are pushing to lower that limit a shocking 98%, to just 100 kilowatts – roughly 10,000 square feet of solar panels and far too small for most commercial developments – while solar industry advocates are pushing for the size limit to be increased to 10MW. The Utility Commission’s Public Staff, representing consumers, doesn’t advocate changing the current 5MW size limit.

Why Idle A Green Economic Engine? 

These two potential regulatory changes mean stakes are high for state regulators and the future of renewable energy in North Carolina. The solar industry has become an economic engine with 137 companies employing 3,100 workers statewide, generating $787 million in 2013 investments while solar PV system prices fell 8% in the past year.

Even in a fossil-fuel heavy energy market, solar has grown fast in North Carolina. The Tarheel State had 592MW installed solar capacity at the end of 2013, fourth-most in America. 335MW of that total was installed in 2013 – enough to power 31,809 homes. As a result, voters support clean energy development across the state.

High Stakes For North Carolina (And Maybe America)

But all that progress would be lost if the utilities get their way. “Changes proposed by the utilities would have the effect of significantly reducing, if not eliminating, the development of solar,” said Zoe Gamble Hanes of FLS Energy. “The industry is maturing in North Carolina and technological breakthroughs related to storage are imminent.”

Ironically the former CEO of Duke Energy, North Carolina’s largest utility, recently came out in support of more distributed energy and urged the energy industry to “run to the challenge and embrace the change.”

State regulators aren’t expected to issue a decision until this fall, but the battle lines have been drawn. On one side, the solar industry wants to continue growing green jobs and distributed clean electricity. On the other side, utilities want to squash solar power (says advocacy group NC WARN) in a move that could expand the battlefield in fossil fuel funded fights against renewables across America.

Check out our new 93-page EV report, based on over 2,000 surveys collected from EV drivers in 49 of 50 US states, 26 European countries, and 9 Canadian provinces.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

About the Author

Silvio is Principal at Marcacci Communications, a full-service clean energy and climate policy public relations company based in Oakland, CA.

  • Mickey Askins

    If you want green energy fight, and never vote for a party trying to stop it.

  • David Howes

    It makes me laugh that companies and political entities are trying to stop what is clearly an unstoppable force. Fact: Approx. every two years the number of watts of electricity produced via solar power doubles. This steady doubling has been happening since the 60’s, and hasn’t been impacted by economic downturns or wars. But go ahead, try and stop it.

    • Bob_Wallace

      The more they can slow the inevitable, the more years of revenue they get from their dying investments.

  • JamesWimberley

    Will solar and offshore wind become battle lines in the November Congressional elections? There’s no mention of climate or energy on (Democratic Senate candidate) Kay Hagan’s website for one, but politicians respond to events and opportunities.

    • sault

      Therein lies the problems with the Democratic Party base voters. They tend not to show up for midterm elections, runoffs and state legislator elections and only really get excited for presidential election years. In 2008 and 2012, NC was basically a “purple” state in the popular vote. However, since these same voters didn’t bother to show up for state congressional elections, NC and many other states dominated by Republicans, has been gerrymandered to all hell, unfairly tilting their U.S. House delegation to the extreme right.

      This results in sort of a feedback loop where Democrats up for reelection during the midterms have to run to the right in order to have a chance to win since more left-leaning voters don’t show up to the polls. This tack to the right probably turns off the activists and makes the democratic-leaning voters in these states lose interest. However, past experience shows that embracing the science on climate change and supporting renewable energy are political winners. Sen Hagan should up the ante by supporting renewable energy full throttle and remind voters how much possibility for North Carolina’s economic growth lies with increased renewable energy development.

  • DGW

    When conservatives talk about a free market for business to thrive, they only mean their own business.

    • sault

      Usually, but not all the time, they also assume that renewables are 100% dependent on subsidies (regardless of the facts) and they completely ignore the much larger subsidies that fossil fuels and nuclear power have received and continue to receive to this day. And since many of them also believe that climate change doesn’t exist or that pollution isn’t a problem, it is fairly difficult to get them to understand the gross amount of external costs that fossil fuels saddle us with. It’s hard to have a conversation when the two sides can’t even agree on basic facts.

      • Shiggity

        I just enjoy the fact that many of the dominant renewable energy states are republican states. These attacks are pathetic and a waste of good money.

Back to Top ↑