Fossil Fuels USGS and FWS tie fish die-off to fracking wastewater.

Published on August 31st, 2013 | by Tina Casey


Fracking Wastewater Cited In Blackside Dace Die-Off, Probably

August 31st, 2013 by  

If you’ve never heard of Blackside dace before, now’s your chance. Blackside dace is a federally listed threatened species of minnow found only in the Cumberland Basin part of Tennessee and Kentucky.  We suddenly find them quite interesting because the US Geological Survey has partnered with the Fish and Wildlife Service in a newly released report that cites a fracking wastewater spill in Kentucky’s Acorn Fork as the probable cause of a mass die-off of Blackside dace and other species back in 2007.

The report is significant because, although it doesn’t get to the 100 percent certainty point, its degree of near certainty is quite an achievement given that a gaping trade secrets loophole makes fracking related water contamination almost impossible to prove.

The Acorn Fork Fracking Episode

The Acorn Fork fracking wastewater report appears in the latest special issue of the in peer-reviewed journal Southeastern Naturalist. It details an episode in which fracking waste fluid from operations at four wells overflowed retention pits and spilled into Acorn Fork, which is on Kentucky’s list of Outstanding State Resource Waters. Among other chemicals the fluid contained hydrochloric acid, dissolved minerals, and metals.

The result was a precipitous drop in pH and an increase in conductivity (conductivity refers to the electrical current in water, which affects the health of aquatic organisms), accounting for a “significant die-off” of Blackside dace along with more common species including the Creek chub and Green sunfish.

In addition to examining water samples, the investigators gathered evidence from fish sampled after the episode. The observations included gill lesions consistent with exposure to low pH and high concentrations of heavy metals, along with uptake of aluminum and iron that was consistent with waterborne concentrations, leading investigators to conclude that “the abrupt and persistent changes in post-fracking water quality resulted in toxic conditions that could have been deleterious to Blackside Dace health and survival.”

The Elusive Fracking Water Contamination Issue

Until now, most water contamination issues related to fracking have dealt with the operation itself, which involves pumping a chemical brine deep underground to shake methane gas loose from shale deposits. However, tracing the contamination back to its source has been difficult if not impossible. There are no federal laws requiring the industry to disclose the ingredients in fracking brine, though under the Obama Administration the US EPA has been slowly but steadily developing an information platform.

The new study underscores an important secondary issue, which is water contamination related to the storage and disposal of wastewater from fracking operations. Aside from the deliberate illegal dumping of fracking wastewater, the conventional open lagoon storage method lends itself to some obvious environmental hazards including leakage and overflows.

Let’s also note for the record that earthquakes have been traced to the common (and legal) disposal practice of injecting fracking wastewater into inactive wells.

Bad (Or Good) Timing On That Fracking Report

This is most likely a total coincidence, but the Acorn Fork report comes as the Bureau of Land Management considers new regulations for fracking on public lands. It also follows close on the heels of another problematic report for the fracking industry, in the form of public comments that the National Park Service submitted to BLM regarding the need for a more rigorous assessment of the impact of impact of fracking operations.

In a nutshell, NPS was satisfied with the methodology for addressing water resource impacts, but argued that the proposed regulations also need to address air resource issues as well as impacts to wildlife especially threatened and endangered species, cultural resources, visual resources, and recreation.

Regarding air resources, NPS focused on the management of stray methane gas from drilling sites and the impact of these “fugitive emissions” on climate change. The problem is that although natural gas is touted as a “cleaner” fuel than, say, coal in terms of greenhouse gas emissions when burned, that advantage could be canceled out by the amount of gas released into the atmosphere during other parts of the lifecycle including drilling, transportation and storage.

The NPS comments solicited howls of outrage from the industry, as chronicled by our friends over at (the article includes a handy link to a pdf of the NPS comments, btw). The Hill’s Ben Gemen reports that in particular, the Independent Petroleum Association of America complained that the NPS was “out of step” with other federal agencies.

That’s not entirely true, though. While not a definitive study, a recent NOAA survey of fugitive emissions at one Colorado gas field indicate that in terms of sustainable fuels of the future, fracking might not be all it’s cracked up to be. Last time we checked, NOAA was a federal agency.

Stay tuned.

Follow me on Twitter and Google+.

Check out our new 93-page EV report, based on over 2,000 surveys collected from EV drivers in 49 of 50 US states, 26 European countries, and 9 Canadian provinces.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

About the Author

specializes in military and corporate sustainability, advanced technology, emerging materials, biofuels, and water and wastewater issues. Tina’s articles are reposted frequently on Reuters, Scientific American, and many other sites. Views expressed are her own. Follow her on Twitter @TinaMCasey and Google+.

  • Being exempt from the clean water act needs to change… unfortunately, the industry influence would ensure it doesn’t…


  • tomandersen

    When solar panels need installing right on top of endangered tortoises, they go in. When wind turbines need roads through national parks, they are bulldozed. When 30% of corn acreage is dedicated to biofuels, wiping out gains made in converting farm land to wild lands, its ok.

    Those are real ecological ‘side effects’ of ‘green’ energy.

    • Bob_Wallace

      Take a look in the mirror, Tom.

      Your nose should be a bit longer after that one….

    • mike_dyke

      When fracking needs more space for waste water and there’s a nearby Outstanding State Resource Water facility nearby – it goes in.

      This is the real ecological ‘effect’ of ‘fracking’ energy.

    • Dan Hue

      No fair-minded person would equivalate fracking to wind or solar farms. While the latter may on occasion threaten rare local species (when done poorly), the former threatens entire ecosystems. The scale of fracking operations over areas such as the Marcellus and Barnett Shale is mind blowing. Google “fracking aerial pictures” to get an idea. We’re talking tens of thousands of pads, each with a significant (up to several acres) industrial like footprint. The pollution around the wells (air and water), not just from accidental spills, though denied by the industry and corrupted officials, is obvious, as well as the detrimental health impact to people, livestock and wildlife. The damage done to nature and the communities affected will be irreversible. This is a time bomb that is going to backfire big time, no pun intended.

  • Matt

    Yes the Bush gave Fracking exception to keep what they used in the liquid a secret and then the Industry says you can’t prove those chemicals are even in our liquid.

    • Dan Hue

      And when law suits arise, they settle and gag the parties. One day though, the floodgates will open and the truth will come out. It won’t be pretty.

Back to Top ↑