Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

CleanTechnica

Cars

Auto Dealers Say Tesla Opening Stores In Minnesota Is “Not Fair”

Tesla Motors has been facing some opposition from The Minnesota Automobile Dealers Association (MADA) with regards to its plan to begin opening retail stores in Minnesota. MADA recently introduced a law which would make it illegal for carmakers to operate dealerships within the state, shortly after they became aware of the California-based electric-vehicle company’s plans.

Tesla Dealership

Current law prohibits carmakers from directly competing against dealers who sell the same make of car. The proposed law would be an expansion upon this.

Tesla’s current plans are to open a retail store “at the Mall of America in Bloomington, MN, as well as a service center in Edina, about 10 miles southwest of Minneapolis,” AutoblogGreen reports. As Tesla’s Diarmuid O’Connell told Automotive News, the company is just “trying to preserve our ability to operate.” MADA’s Executive Vice President, Scott Lambert, has been quoted as saying that the possibility of dealers having to compete with automakers on the retail front was simply “not fair.”

Not fair? Damn, that’s a convincing argument.

From the looks of it, this is simply about the local auto dealers being worried that Tesla is going to outcompete them, by offering a better product and service, and cut into their business.

Tesla won a legal victory in a similar situation back in January, when the Massachusetts state auto dealer’s association was trying something similar. The judge involved in that case threw out the auto dealers lawsuit based on the dealers’ “lack of standing and failure to state a claim.” The auto dealers association there has appealed the decision.

Update: Some good comments from readers seemed worth highlighting, so I’m pasting them here as an addendum (for those of you who never make it down to the comments section). The first one is from Jack Burgess, and the second is from Ross Chandler.

Jack Burgess: In 48 States there are antiquated franchise laws that forbid or severely restrict automakers from selling vehicles directly to the public. In other words, when you want to buy a new vehicle, you must go through a dealership and PAY SEVERAL HUNDRED DOLLARS MORE than you might otherwise!

These franchise laws are long overdue for repeal. Many of them were written over 100 years ago and are completely out of step with a modern market. At this point, they are protectionist and just plain anti-competitive. Most troubling, they prevent needed changes to the outdated “dealership only” purchasing business model. Dealership businesses that typically exalt the free-market system and decry government regulations are using these franchise laws to protect an ancient, restrictive business model that was created before television, cell phones, the Internet, and e-commerce. They inject a middleman into a process that doesn’t require one, ultimately raising the costs of our vehicle purchases and limiting our selection of products.

Why are the dealerships and their mouthpiece, the National Automobile Dealers Association (NADA), in such a frenzy to shut the Tesla stores down? Why are they lobbying in Colorado for even more restrictive franchise laws specifically aimed at Tesla?

The simple answer is that NADA and the dealerships are using political influence to protect themselves from any sort of free-market competition that may threaten their 100+ year old business model. Anyone who believes in free-market capitalism should be appalled.

In a Fox News article [link in comment below the post], the NADA chairman, William Underriner, was quoted as saying that NADA “has ‘a whole mess of lawyers in Washington’ who work on state franchise laws.” This is CRONY-CAPITALISM AT ITS WORST, where a powerful group of businesses and their political lobbyists influence legislation for the benefit of a well-connected few at the expense of the rest of us.

Any dealership that truly adds value to the process of buying a new vehicle or in servicing those vehicles should have no need for the protection of a franchise law. It is painfully obvious that customers in a modern free market should have the choice of how they purchase their vehicles, be it at a dealership, from a direct manufacturer store, through the Internet, or however else.

Ross Chandler: Very few tears are going to be shed over dealers having to compete harder.

Image Credit: Tesla Motors

 
Appreciate CleanTechnica’s originality and cleantech news coverage? Consider becoming a CleanTechnica Member, Supporter, Technician, or Ambassador — or a patron on Patreon.
 

Don't want to miss a cleantech story? Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!
 

Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.
Advertisement
 
Written By

James Ayre's background is predominantly in geopolitics and history, but he has an obsessive interest in pretty much everything. After an early life spent in the Imperial Free City of Dortmund, James followed the river Ruhr to Cofbuokheim, where he attended the University of Astnide. And where he also briefly considered entering the coal mining business. He currently writes for a living, on a broad variety of subjects, ranging from science, to politics, to military history, to renewable energy.

Comments

You May Also Like

Clean Transport

It’s been a long wait since we very enthusiastically discovered all of the amazing features and specs of the Tesla Semi when it was...

Autonomous Vehicles

When it comes to irresponsible use of systems like Autopilot, FSD Beta, Super Cruise, or Blue Cruise, there tends to be a lot of...

Cars

September 2022 saw plugin electric vehicles take 24.2% share of the French auto market, up from 21.5% year on year. Full electrics grew share...

Cars

New Zealand’s aggressive bonus malus approach has enabled a fully electric vehicle (BEV), the Tesla Model Y, to become the top selling car in...

Copyright © 2021 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.