Clean Power

Published on December 22nd, 2012 | by Guest Contributor


BlueGreen Alliance Statement On Budget & Tax (“Fiscal Cliff”) Negotiations

December 22nd, 2012 by  

Here’s a statement from the BlueGreen Alliance on the ‘fiscal cliff’ action Congress & Obama need to take: 

BlueGreen Alliance Statement

Congress and the President face a stark choice in the policies being offered to address our current crises – a choice between austerity and shared prosperity. The bottom line: Austerity and budget cuts now will make our economic and environmental crises worse and lead to more misery for millions of people. Conversely, a program of shared prosperity, labor rights, environmental protection, and public investment, will lead to job creation, higher standards of living and an enhanced quality of life.

The advocates of austerity call for significant cuts to vital programs and public investments as a means to decrease the federal deficit. Practical experience and 70 years of history have proven that economic austerity and budget cuts in a period of high unemployment lead to more job loss and economic misery. This is what happened when budgets were balanced in the U.S. during the Great Depression and recently in Great Britain. It would be short sighted and immoral to deal with our economic problems by cutting important programs and placing undue burdens on the middle class. The impacts of such policies will reach far into the future. For example, we should not undercut the advancements we are finally making in clean energy – a sector that will be among the biggest job-creating and pollution-reducing industries of the future.

There is a clear alternative to austerity. Shared prosperity includes long term investments in our physical and human infrastructure that will increase good jobs, improve our environment, and create the conditions for a sustainable economy that will resolve concerns about the federal debt. Our own history shows that the policies of shared prosperity ended the Great Depression and provided the basis for the following three decades of economic prosperity while also paying off the largest federal debt ever incurred because of WWII.

In spite of the often one-sided rhetoric, we can drive programs of fairness and innovation, economic growth and environmental protection, job creation and climate change pollution reduction. We can do all of this while also addressing concerns about the federal debt. And we can achieve this without squeezing America’s working class and our engines of innovation.

Our real challenge is to build a fair, sustainable economy for the 21st Century that puts America on a path toward both broad prosperity as well as economic and environmental sustainability. As the debate moves toward Congressional action and supposed “grand bargains,” we believe that the following principles must be met to achieve the vision we have laid out:

No additional cuts. The cuts to federal programs demanded by House leadership have already gone too far in weakening the safety net and public safeguards and diminishing basic investments in domestic infrastructure and innovation.

Revenues. As a matter of belief that we owe future generations more opportunities for broad prosperity, lawmakers must be open minded about rescinding tax breaks for companies/industries and individuals that do not need them. These revenues should be used primarily to invest in America. 

Invest in America and Good Jobs. Our economy requires significant investments in the industries and infrastructure of the 21st century including clean energy, advanced transportation, broadband, education, water and healthcare. These investments will provide millions of jobs, protect our quality of life and help build a new foundation for a sustainable economy. We also need to ensure that these are good jobs by restoring workers’ rights to collectively bargain, raising the minimum wage, and improving other workplace standards.

Democratic Reform. The only way to ensure that public policy is made in the public interest is to ensure that government – and elected officials – are accountable to all our citizens.

This requires basic reforms to guarantee that every citizen has the right and ability to vote and that private interests cannot dominate the electoral and legislative process.

We strongly advise lawmakers to abide by these principles. They will create the conditions and incentives needed to resolve our current economic crisis, improve the quality of life of all Americans, and provide the basis for such improvements for future generations. Succumbing to the faulty policies of austerity will exacerbate our economic and environmental crises – the two most serious generational challenges we currently face.” 


The BlueGreen Alliance is a national partnership of labor unions and environmental organizations dedicated to expanding the number and quality of jobs in the clean economy. Launched in 2006, the strategic partnership now brings together major U.S. labor unions and America’s most influential environmental organizations and unites more than 15 million members and supporters in pursuit of good jobs, a clean environment and a green economy. Visit

Check out our new 93-page EV report, based on over 2,000 surveys collected from EV drivers in 49 of 50 US states, 26 European countries, and 9 Canadian provinces.

Tags: , , ,

About the Author

is many, many people. We publish a number of guest posts from experts in a large variety of fields. This is our contributor account for those special people. :D

  • Daniel Wilcox

    I think most readers on this site–myself included–would agree that environmental and economic sustainability are good things.

    This article’s opinion unsettles me because its arguments are based primarily on the Great Depression and WWII. I think a more holistic analysis would be more convincing.

    At the present time, I am inclined to think that putting the nation in more debt now would mean a bigger crash later. I think the crash was avoided after the WWII debt because the USA grew tremendously in GDP due to the debt. In other words, small companies can benefit from going into debt if they use the debt to grow their business—and countries are not much different. In the current global economic climate, I doubt the USA’s GDP could be dramatically improved by going into more debt. Therefore I think more debt now will mean a bigger crash later.

    • Bob_Wallace

      Well, less debt now could mean a much worse crash later.

      Our economy is stalled. Tax revenues are down and unemployment/welfare costs are up. Many of our ongoing expenses are beyond our control. We can’t, for example, stop payment on interest debt or fail to pay government employees and military members.

      If we borrow a bit more money (at today’s almost zero interest rate) and use it to stimulate the economy we can breathe some life back into the system.

      It’s a perfect time to improve our infrastructure. Our roads and bridges are in poor shape. Our electric grid is wasting energy. Our buildings require too much heat to keep comfortable. The list goes on.

      We dropped a train into the water a couple weeks ago when a bridge failed.

      Bad roads cost us in gas mileage and vehicle wear and tear. That drives up our cost of production and lowers our ability to compete and grow our GDP.

      Borrow some money. Put Americans to work fixing the country. Those people going to work come off the unemployment and welfare roles, expenses drop. Those newly employed people pay taxes, revenues increase.

      It’s just good business.

      We spend a lot of taxpayer dollars and health insurance premium money to pay for the health damaged caused by burning coal. If you include all the external costs of coal then it’s obvious that coal is our most expensive energy source.

      By installing more renewable energy and improving efficiency we can further reduce the amount of coal we burn and lower the price we pay for electricity.

      Cheaper electricity means that it becomes easier to compete on the global market. The more competitive we become, the higher our GDP grows.

      • By dropping the give aways that cola/oil get right now, as stated in international agreements. We could cover a large investment in the country. If we starting to charge coal/oil for the externals, we could cover a lot more. Like PV on every government building paring lot in a couple of years.

Back to Top ↑