Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

CleanTechnica

Aviation

Not Crashing Our Boat — Finding Our Way Out of the Climate Crisis

This is a special guest post from one of our regular readers. It’s an attempt to bring some light to the dire situation we are in globally, and to show how we can inch our way out of total societal collapse. Included in the email to me with this were some very apt lines (nothing conveys a point better than a good metaphor):

“I spent a few years living on a sailboat and there are times when you’re headed into a dock a bit faster than is comfortable and realize it’s time to back off.  You throw the prop into reverse and give it full throttle.  For a while you keep closing on the dock but then you realize that sweet feeling of slowing down and starting to back off.”

And also this line: “It seems that a tale can be told that we seem to have turned the corner thanks to the ‘good  witches’ of renewables and travel efficiency and some help from the ‘grey witch’ of natural gas.”

Here’s the full piece:

1. CO2 peaking by 2020 and cutting 9% of emissions per year should save us from runaway climate change.

In 2009, the German Advisory Council on Global Change released the following graph. It illustrates how much we would have to cut our CO2 emissions per year once we reach peak output. Clearly, we missed the 2011 point and are fairly certain to miss the 2016 point. But if we can peak, worldwide, by 2020 or sooner, we can limit CO2 emissions to 750 billion tonnes between  2010 and 2050.

2) US CO2 emissions seem to have peaked and dropped to late 1990s levels. The highest CO2 emission year was 2005.

CO2 emissions:

  • 2005 = 6,029 million tonnes. (Metric tons, 2,200 pounds.)
  • 2010 = 5,634 million tonnes.

CO2 emissions decreased 395 million tonnes or 6.6% from 2005 to 2010.

2005 was the year of peak CO2 emission and 2010 is the most recent year for which we have final data.  Preliminary 2011 data finds CO2 down a bit lower, to approximately 1998 levels. First quarter 2012 CO2 levels were roughly equal to first quarter 1992 levels.

“It’s the recession, stupid. Of course we released less CO2, our economy has crashed and we’ve cut way back on electricity generation and driving.”

Let’s look at the pre-recession peak year of 2005 vs. 2010, the most recent post-recession year for which we have complete data, and unofficial 2011 numbers.

Was it because our economy is in worse shape as measured by gross domestic product (GDP)? Below is what has happened post 1990. Plotted are percentage changes from 1990 levels. 2011 numbers are not “official” numbers and may be revised when the final 2011 report comes out later this year.

GDP increases every year over 1990 with a small dip in 2009. CO2 rises slowly until 2005 and then falls.

  • 2005 GDP — $12,623.0 million
  • 2010 GDP — $14,526.5 million

Dollar amounts are normalized. GDP increased $1,903.5 million or 15.1% from 2005 to 2010. So, no. CO2 emissions fell 6.6% and GDP rose 15.1%.

Was it because we generated less electricity? Again, let’s start with 1990 and see how the amount of electricity generated and CO2 released fared on a percentage from 1990 levels progressed.

Electricity generation increased to about 2007 and then more or less leveled out, with a downward blip in 2009.  CO2, as we’ve seen before, peaks at 2005 and then starts downward. (Once again, 2011 number may be revised in the final 2011 report.)

  • In 2005, electricity generated was 4,055,421 thousand MWhs.
  • In 2010, electricity generated  was 4,127,647 thousand MWhs.

Electrical generation increased 72,226 thousand MWhs, or 1.8%, from 2005 to 2010. So, no again, answer not discovered. In 2010, we generated 1.8% more electricity while CO2 emissions fell 6.6%.

Might it be how we generated electricity?

As can be seen in this graph, the percentage of electricity generated using coal was in the low 50% range during the 1990s, but began to start falling in the 2000s. In 1990, coal produced 52.5% of our electricity. By 2010, its contribution was down to 42.4%, and unofficial numbers for 2012 have coal in the 30% range.

Natural gas, while presenting its own problems of methane leaks and groundwater contamination during fracking, does produce about half the amount of CO2 as does coal when producing a unit of electricity.

And, from 2005 until 2010, non-hydro renewables (wind, geothermal, and solar) rose from a 2.2% to a 4.4% generation level.

Was it that we traveled less and burned less oil?

In  2005, Americans drove 8,190 millions miles per day. In 2010, they drove 8,127, a decrease of 63 million miles, or only 0.8%.

Airline “seat miles” fell from 1,029,244 in 2005 to 991,929 in 2010. That was a decrease of 37,315 units, or 3.6%.

Oil consumption in 2005 was 20,802 thousand barrels per day. In 2010, the US was consuming 19,180 thousand barrels per day. Oil consumption dropped 1,622 thousand barrels per day, or 7.8%.

We drove about the same (-0.8%) and flew somewhat less (-3.6%) but cut our oil usage by 7.8%. That should tell us where some of our lower oil-produced CO2 emissions came from — about half from decreased usage and half from higher efficiency.

Overall, the US has cut CO2 emissions over the last 6-7 years. Some from burning less coal and making more electricity from natural gas and renewable sources. Some from flying a bit less, but as much or more than that from driving and flying more efficiently. It seems that we are on the right track — now it’s time to speed things up.

 
Appreciate CleanTechnica’s originality and cleantech news coverage? Consider becoming a CleanTechnica Member, Supporter, Technician, or Ambassador — or a patron on Patreon.
 

Don't want to miss a cleantech story? Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!
 

Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.
Advertisement
 
Written By

Zach is tryin' to help society help itself one word at a time. He spends most of his time here on CleanTechnica as its director, chief editor, and CEO. Zach is recognized globally as an electric vehicle, solar energy, and energy storage expert. He has presented about cleantech at conferences in India, the UAE, Ukraine, Poland, Germany, the Netherlands, the USA, Canada, and Curaçao. Zach has long-term investments in Tesla [TSLA], NIO [NIO], Xpeng [XPEV], Ford [F], ChargePoint [CHPT], Amazon [AMZN], Piedmont Lithium [PLL], Lithium Americas [LAC], Albemarle Corporation [ALB], Nouveau Monde Graphite [NMGRF], Talon Metals [TLOFF], Arclight Clean Transition Corp [ACTC], and Starbucks [SBUX]. But he does not offer (explicitly or implicitly) investment advice of any sort.

Comments

You May Also Like

Air Quality

The legislation which will come up for a vote in Congress very soon all but ensures that the fossil fuel industry will maintain current...

Clean Power

Shah's perspective is that we don't have the ability to go into Sim City and design whatever we want. We have to work with...

Air Quality

Since Congressional zero emissions vision has stagnated, climate activists are prompting different constituent groups to address the climate crisis.

Agriculture

Investing in the segment has one of the biggest impacts on decarbonization when assessed in terms of the market value of avoided CO2e emissions...

Copyright © 2021 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.