Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

CleanTechnica

Clean Power

Operator Error and Lack of Planning Key to 2011 San Diego Blackout

 
In 2011, 2.7 million people across Southern California, Arizona, and Baja California were left without power when a single transmission line in Arizona was lost, which led to a cascading series of failures. Now, a report which was initiated in an effort to determine the cause of the blackout and to make recommendations to avoid similar situations in the future has been published.

Lack of Planning Coupled with No Peripheral Vision to Blame

The report was released jointly by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) on May 1. It blamed the massive blackout on both the lack of planning and lack of observability and awareness of system operating conditions on the day of the event.

The nearly eight-month inquiry recommended that transmission operators and balancing authorities improve how they plan for operations to account for the status of facilities outside their individual systems, the effect of external operations on their own systems, and how operation of transmission facilities under 100 kiloVolts can affect the reliability of the bulk power system.

San Diego Power Outage Sky Panorama

3-frame panorama overlooking Miramar (which had power) and Mira Mesa (which didn't have power). The scene is mainly lit by headlights and the moon.

“This report highlights the growing need for more coordination of grid operations in the West,” FERC Chairman Jon Wellinghoff said. “Implementing the recommendations in this report will assist in enhancing the planning and system awareness measures that are necessary to operate an efficiently integrated bulk power system, and reduce costs to consumers from these types of outages that could continue if operational efficiencies are not improved.”

The report is the result of a massive amount of work for FERC and NERC staff, who conducted on-site interviews, created sophisticated computer modelling, simulations of the event in question, and system analysis. Their findings showed that “entities responsible for planning, operating and monitoring the bulk power system were not prepared to ensure reliable operation or prevent cascading outages in the event of a single contingency,” that being the loss of Arizona Public Service’s Hassayampa-North Gila 500 kiloVolt transmission line.

“This event underscores how complex and interdependent our North American electric systems are and the critical importance of information sharing, communications, system studies and coordinated operations among all interconnected systems,” said Gerry Cauley, president and CEO of NERC.  “Transmission operators, Balancing Authorities and Reliability Coordinators must work together to effectively manage this complex system.”

“Today’s report provides a series of lessons learned from the September 2011 event that is available to industry for use as a tool to improve their operations and planning of the grid,” FERC Commissioner John Norris said. “My hope is that the findings and recommendations in this report will be utilized to the broadest extent possible in order to enhance the reliability and efficiency of the Bulk Power System.”

The Report’s Recommendations

The report recommends that bulk power system operators improve their situational awareness through improved communication, data sharing and the use of real-time tools. It also recommends that:

  • System planners and operators recognize, study and incorporate the effects of sub-100 kV systems on bulk power system reliability into their planning and operations;
  • The Western Electricity Coordinating Council (WECC) recognize and study Interconnection reliability operating limits;
  • Transmission Owners and Operators review overload protection relay settings to give them more time to mitigate overloads;
  • Transmission Operators and WECC study the effects of special protection systems, remedial action schemes and safety nets, such as the one that disconnected San Diego from the high voltage lines south of the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, to understand how they affect reliability and to ensure that they do not have unintended or undesirable effects; and
  • System operators plan and account for phase angle differences in order to be able to re-energize transmission lines following outages.

For those readers interested enough in this story, the joint report is available in it’s entirety here (PDF) as well as a fantastic step-by-step sequence of events (PDF), which is really quite fascinating in lieu of the end result; very “pebble causes a landslide” sort of story.

Image Source: Kevin Baird

 
Appreciate CleanTechnica’s originality? Consider becoming a CleanTechnica Member, Supporter, Technician, or Ambassador — or a patron on Patreon.
 
 

Advertisement
 
Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

Written By

I'm a Christian, a nerd, a geek, and I believe that we're pretty quickly directing planet-Earth into hell in a handbasket! I also write for Fantasy Book Review (.co.uk), and can be found writing articles for a variety of other sites. Check me out at about.me for more.

Comments

You May Also Like

Cars

The Los Angeles Auto Show announced in September that it would hold an inaugural awards program called THE ZEVAS this year. That stands for...

Clean Transport

Originally published by Penn State News By Sara LaJeunesse Ride-hailing services, like Uber and Lyft, are lauded by some for their ability to decrease...

Climate Change

Ending new leasing for offshore oil and gas is crucial both to mitigate climate change as well as help marine ecosystems become more resilient...

Clean Transport

Article courtesy of NRDC. By Miles Muller & Max Baumhefner  The California Public Utilities Commission broke new ground this week, approving new rules that will ensure utilities...

Copyright © 2021 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.