Clean Power

Published on March 1st, 2012 | by Ravinder Casley Gera


New Wind Down, Nuclear Up as UK Rethinks Energy Mix

March 1st, 2012 by  

An island nation buffeted by winds from the Ural mountains and the North Atlantic, the United Kingdom ought to be a world leader in wind power. But a combination of political resistance, cultural conservatism and the distraction of North Sea oil and gas drilling has meant Blighty has never quite lived up to its potential as a centre of wind, especially compared to its near-neighbours Denmark and the Netherlands. (See a listing of the top countries for wind power capacity according to GDP.)

Blacklaw Wind Farm, the UK's most powerful onshore wind power installation

Now, new data from a renewable energy industry body shows that 4 GW of expected new wind projects in the UK in the next few years have effectively been cancelled. The report, from the Electricity Networks Strategy Group, predicts that 28.3 GW of wind power will be installed in the UK by 2020. That’s 4 GW down from their last report, in 2010, the Guardian explains.

The estimate includes offshore and onshore wind power. As an island, Britain is well-placed to invest in offshore wind power, and plans are underway for a slew of new large offshore projects. But the downgraded estimate reflects growing concerns about the economic viability of offshore wind in the UK, as well as increasing opposition to onshore wind from campaigners concerned about the impact on the countryside. A group of MPs from the Conservative party, the larger party in Britain’s ruling coalition, recently wrote to the Prime Minister David Cameron demanding big cuts in government subsidies for onshore wind power. The UK government has already reduced subsidies for solar energy, and cuts to wind subsidies are widely expected later this year.

This is despite the fact that according to another Guardian report, subsidies in the UK for wind power are still significantly less than subsidies to fossil fuels, which mostly come in the form of reduced taxes on energy bills. These subsidies constitute £3.63 billion per year for gas, oil and coal, according to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, and just £0.7 billion for wind and a similar amount for other renewables.

But for the nuclear industry – and supporters of nuclear energy – the news is much better. The ENSG’s report has increased its estimate of Britain’s installed nuclear capacity in 2020 by 5GW.

The ENSG includes representatives of the UK government, the energy regulator Ofgem, and leading industry investors. However, the government has said it thinks its own estimate from last year, of 31 GW of installed wind in 2020, is more accurate, despite being a year old.

For more on the latest developments in wind power in the UK, see Floating Wind Farm Feasibility Study Launched in Cornwall (UK).

Source: Guardian (1) (2) | Picture: Wikimedia Commons

Check out our new 93-page EV report, based on over 2,000 surveys collected from EV drivers in 49 of 50 US states, 26 European countries, and 9 Canadian provinces.

Tags: , , ,

About the Author

is a London-based freelance journalist passionate about climate change, development and technology. He has written for the Daily Express,, and the Fly. He blogs at

  • Gregorynorminton

    Unfortunately, the Conservative party’s electorate is fed a daily diet of nonsense by the rightwing press: endless junk science and unbalanced reporting to feed an anti-renewables backlash. These same publications – The Mail, the Telegraph, The Spectator, and to a lesser degree the Murdoch papers – are also full of outright climate change denial. And although the Prime Minister seems to know better (he has access to experts, rather than hacks), he hasn’t the guts to challenge the obscurantism in public. So British conservatism slides towards the same strategic blindness that now pervades the Republican Party. It’s quite concerning.

  • Bill_Woods


    • Bob_Wallace

      It is excellent.

      If you’re in favor of Brits spending more for electricity and increasing the pile of hazardous radioactive waste they’re leaving their children, grandchildren, great-grandchildren, ….

      What is it with Britain and its former colonies, Australia, Canada and the US? Is there something in the genetic Brit gene poll that creates stupid conservative parties?

      Is it perhaps a desire to grieve the loss of Empire by just destroying the planet?

Back to Top ↑