Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?


Clean Power

Clean Energy Standard Act of 2012 Introduced

by Richard W. Caperton (Climate Progress repost)

The barrage of dirty energy bills being introduced in Congress is dizzying. With extreme policymakers looking to force the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline, cut funding for public transportation and dismantle EPA air quality regulations, the situation is bleak.

But there was some positive movement on clean energy in Congress today.

This morning, Senator Jeff Bingaman (D-NM) introduced a bill that would create a federal clean energy standard.  His bill, the Clean Energy Standard Act of 2012, would increase the amount of low-carbon power produced in the United States to 80% by 2035, while providing the policy certainty that’s essential to growing the clean energy economy.

In introducing his bill, Bingaman was joined by fellow Senators Bernie Sanders (I-VT), Al Franken (D-MN), and Chris Coons (D-DE), each of whom praised the bill for providing a path forward on fighting climate change.

The Clean Energy Standard Act also has the support of the energy industry. In addition to usual suspects like the American Wind Energy Association and the United States Clean Heat and Power Association, GE Energy and NextEra Energy Resources are supporting Bingaman’s approach.

In previous work, the Center for American Progress has laid out criteria for what a successful clean energy standard would look like:

  • It must generate new, long-lasting jobs and grow the economy
  • It must effectively spur development and deployment of renewable energy and energy efficiency technologies
  • It must account for regional diversity in resources and electricity markets
  • It must be simple and transparent, and minimize costs
  • It must provide a floor not a ceiling for clean energy, strengthening and building on existing state leadership

Bingaman’s CES proposal meets these criteria, and is the first serious proposal for a national clean energy standard that includes all low-carbon sources of power. The exact mechanics of his proposal rely on utilities holding “clean energy credits” for a certain percentage of their sales, maxing out at 80 percent in 2035.

Different generation resources are rewarded with a certain number of clean energy credits based on their carbon profile compared to an efficient coal-fired power plant. Instead of prescribing credits for different generating technologies, though, Bingaman’s bill calculates the credits based on individual power plant emissions, as reported to EPA.  This creates an incentive for every power plant to be run more efficiently, especially natural gas plants.

There are several other innovative aspects to Bingaman’s proposal.  For example, to make sure that this doesn’t inadvertently cause electric rates to increase, Bingaman allows utilities to buy an “alternative compliance payment” instead of holding clean energy credits.  Instead of returning this money to utilities, he follows a CAP recommendation and returns the money to energy efficiency programs run by the states.  This will lead to important energy efficiency investments.

Bingaman’s bill also recognizes that small utilities may initially have a hard time meeting the CES requirements. He addresses this by initially exempting utilities with fewer than two million megawatt-hours in annual sales, then gradually lowering the exemption level each year to bring more people into the program.

This proposal comes out of years of research and learning.  Most recently, Senator Bingaman and Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) requested input from a diverse set of stakeholders via a detailed questionnaire on different aspects of CES design.  Incorporating this input has led to a policy that will get more renewable energy built, reduce carbon dioxide pollution, and make sure our economy continues to grow.

According to the Energy Information Administration, a well-designed CES proposal will reduce carbon dioxide emissions in the power sector by 43 percent.  The EIA also found that US GDP growth would be virtually unchanged: without a CES, they expect GDP to grow at 2.69 percent per year, while they expect it to grow at 2.67 percent per year with a CES.  Senator Bingaman has asked EIA to analyze his exact proposal, and we’ll likely see the results of that analysis in the coming weeks.

Despite the obvious strengths of this proposal, conventional wisdom says it’s going nowhere.  Clean energy advocates should ignore that pessimistic outlook and urge the Senate to do the right thing and pass this bill.

Richard W. Caperton is Director of Clean Energy Investments at the Center for American Progress.
Photo: US Congress via kevindooley

Appreciate CleanTechnica’s originality and cleantech news coverage? Consider becoming a CleanTechnica Member, Supporter, Technician, or Ambassador — or a patron on Patreon.

Don't want to miss a cleantech story? Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!

Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.
Written By

We publish a number of guest posts from experts in a large variety of fields. This is our contributor account for those special people, organizations, agencies, and companies.


You May Also Like

Fossil Fuels

“Polluters Over People.” That’s the summary of a new bill in Congress that is immeasurably dangerous. WASHINGTON — On the heels of President Biden...

Clean Power

California is proceeding with a plan to install up to 25000 MW of electricity from offshore floating wind turbines by 2045.

Clean Power

Virginia is going from near-zero wind power to 2.6 gigawatts all at once, with the approval of a new offshore wind plan for Dominion...


Omar Qazi (@WholeMarsBlog on Twitter) has a very interesting take on the recent “Inflation Reduction Act” that is very cynical in regards to the...

Copyright © 2021 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.