Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?


Clean Power

New Mexico Tea Party Governor Kills 3% Yearly Pollution Reduction Plan

According to the New York Times, incoming Tea Party Governor Susana Martinez has just fired all of the Environmental Improvement Board members who in December passed pollution reduction legislation, and issued an executive order, to halt all pending regulations to “determine whether they hurt business” in New Mexico. The climate plan had been opposed by the energy interests that funded her candidacy.

In December, under termed-out Democratic Governor Bill Richardson, New Mexico’s Environmental Improvement Board had adopted a greenhouse gas reduction plan that would gradually, at a rate of 3% a year, transition the state to clean energy, by requiring greenhouse gases be reduced 25% below 1990 levels by 2020.

Four Northeastern States have already embarked on similar annual pollution reduction plans, and have been meeting those goals, and California is about to implement its own.

New Mexico’s plan was adopted by the board by an overwhelming majority vote. Martinez halted it to determine if the plan “hurts business.”

Given that the fossil fuel industry sued for two years in court to stop the greenhouse gas reduction plan, it can be assumed that there will certainly be at least one aggrieved industry to claim that regulations “hurt business”.

Under her protection, this will enable big polluters in the state to overturn the regulations. Martinez, an outspoken climate denier candidate, received hundreds of thousands from oil and gas interests, according to the Times. But polluter industry efforts to overturn the ruling via their new Governor might not be that easy.

It was a small local non-profit environmental organization, New Energy Economy, that was instrumental in getting the plan passed into law, with local input and testimony to counter two years of legal obstruction by the fossil energy industry.

The emissions reduction plan would put New Mexico on a path to joining Massachusetts and California, which is just about to begin implementing its own climate plan, having shaken off similar polluter obstruction (with a Tea Party astroturfed ballot initiative: Prop 23) that failed.

The Northeastern RGGI states have for several years succeeded in reducing greenhouses gases with similar legislation that encourages clean energy and efficiency.

The plan was to begin in 2013, and require 3% reductions annually from 2010 levels starting in 2012. It would involve big polluters only, those electric power plants, petroleum and natural gas facilities in New Mexico that generate greenhouse gas pollution emissions exceeding 25,000 metric tons per year of carbon dioxide.

There was flexibility in how the reductions would be achieved. Owners could use drastic cuts in one faciltiy to count towards their overall cuts. So an owner of several power plants could, for example, replace one of several coal plants with a natural gas power plant (for a 60% GHG reduction), or with a (zero emissions) wind or solar farm. There were upper limits to the spending on new plants.

It had surprised to me that a small local environmental organization had been able to face down the fossil industry in court and get this petition passed into law, and in December I had contacted New Energy Economy to find their secret. They are not the NRDC, after all. It appears that local involvement in the court cases was instrumental.

Lilia Diaz told me in December “one of the reasons that we were successful here is because we had a lot of community support throughout the hearings, with people from very different walks of life testifying in support of a cap on carbon pollution”.

Asked about the prospect of a roll back after the election, one of the board members did say at the time that a simple edict from the governor would not be enough to kill the plan, and speculated that even if she reconstituted the board, it could take as long as a year to rescind the measures.

She has begun that process by firing the board members.

For the Martinez administration to succeed in rolling it back, by New Mexico law, this will take another public process, which must include at least one hearing and a chance for public comment to overturn the rules.

The New Energy Economy plan passed in December was very thorough, involving 200 hours of technical testimony and complex documents and public comments before reaching the decision.

Susan kraemer@Twitter

Appreciate CleanTechnica’s originality and cleantech news coverage? Consider becoming a CleanTechnica Member, Supporter, Technician, or Ambassador — or a patron on Patreon.

Don't want to miss a cleantech story? Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!

Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.
Written By

writes at CleanTechnica, CSP-Today and Renewable Energy World.  She has also been published at Wind Energy Update, Solar Plaza, Earthtechling PV-Insider , and GreenProphet, Ecoseed, NRDC OnEarth, MatterNetwork, Celsius, EnergyNow, and Scientific American. As a former serial entrepreneur in product design, Susan brings an innovator's perspective on inventing a carbon-constrained civilization: If necessity is the mother of invention, solving climate change is the mother of all necessities! As a lover of history and sci-fi, she enjoys chronicling the strange future we are creating in these interesting times.    Follow Susan on Twitter @dotcommodity.


You May Also Like

Climate Change

I urge people thinking about Flyvbjerg's work who are asking themselves, "But what about this critically important aspect of project success?," to not assume...

Green Economy

Woke or not, Kentucky is behind a new green steel factory that supports President Joe Biden's goal for offshore wind development in the US.

Clean Power

Global Energy Trends 2023: Crisis, Contingencies, and Climate Change

Clean Power

Gray rhinos are about the strategic perspective of what is important to do, and black swans are about the tactics of dealing with it...

Copyright © 2023 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.