Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?


Clean Power

US Tax Bill to Invest in Very Advanced Renewable Energy Storage

Are you fed up with Senate Democrats being held hostage by Republican fealty to old energy? Today’s news is encouraging. Very advanced renewable energy storage gets big tax credits in the tax bill.

Democrats inserted incentives to invest in EV chargers, thermal storage, high tech renewable energy storage on the grid and other very progressive renewable energy incentives, in amendments in the tax package to be voted on Wednesday, now that the cloture vote passed yesterday.

Here is what we can expect to be voted on tomorrow. California’s Senator Feinstein included in the tax bill the Advanced Energy Tax Incentives Act of 2010

Thermal energy storage tax credits (SEC 963 and 964).
This must have “a round-trip energy storage efficiency of at least 70 percent, be able to store the energy equivalent of at least 2 kilowatt hours of energy and have an output of the energy equivalent of 500 watts of electricity for a period of 4 hours”.

An example of these kinds of huge energy efficiency savings would be the Steffes thermal storage unit that we have covered here, that takes night time off-peak wind power and stores the electricity as heat which can be sent out again on demand. It is being tested to advance distributed storage on the grid.

Tax credit to invest in on-site energy storage (SEC. 963)
It must “provide supplemental energy to reduce peak energy requirements primarily on the same site where the storage is located.” Examples would be Ice Energy which makes air conditioning carbon neutral by storing night time wind power on the roofs of commercial buildings.

To qualify, it must have:
1.  the ability to store the energy equivalent of at least 20 kWh of energy,
2.  the ability to have an output of the energy equivalent of 5 kw of electricity for 4 hours, and
3. a round-trip energy storage efficiency of not less than 70 percent.

EV chargers: tax credits up to $1 million a year/30% of cost
Any “property used to charge plug-in and hybrid electric vehicles if such property or vehicles are equipped with smart grid services which control time-of-day charging and discharging of such vehicles.” These must be able to store at least 20 kWh, or about one sunny day’s supply with a 3.5 KW solar system.

This will be not only an incentive to put in EV chargers, but also the solar panels to supply that electricity, because the energy storage must be “designed and used primarily to receive and store intermittent renewable energy generated on-site and to deliver such energy primarily for on-site consumption”.

The majority of Democrats already supported the renewable energy provisions on the first attempt when the tax cuts bill was to be just for incomes under $250,000 – when Republicans prevented an up or down vote, by preventing the cloture vote.

But in last weekend’s failed (not 60) cloture vote (to hold a vote), 53 Democrats voted Yes. So it is likely that now this renewable energy expansion will pass, given an up or down vote, as once cloture is passed, you only need 50 votes.

Not only did Democrats get back the one year extension of the expiring Section 1603 (30% off in cash in lieu of tax credit to solar and wind projects) that they demanded in return for supporting the GOP tax bill, but they have added even more investment in renewable energy.

[Update 12/16/2010: In the end none of the many amendments offered on 12/13 were allowed. Most were terrible, so for the others, it was a good thing, but unfortunately for this one. It did not get a chance at an up or down vote, despite Energy Chair Senator Bingaman’s support]

Image: The Carlos
Susan Kraemer@Twitter

Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!

Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

Former Tesla Battery Expert Leading Lyten Into New Lithium-Sulfur Battery Era — Podcast:

I don't like paywalls. You don't like paywalls. Who likes paywalls? Here at CleanTechnica, we implemented a limited paywall for a while, but it always felt wrong — and it was always tough to decide what we should put behind there. In theory, your most exclusive and best content goes behind a paywall. But then fewer people read it! We just don't like paywalls, and so we've decided to ditch ours. Unfortunately, the media business is still a tough, cut-throat business with tiny margins. It's a never-ending Olympic challenge to stay above water or even perhaps — gasp — grow. So ...
If you like what we do and want to support us, please chip in a bit monthly via PayPal or Patreon to help our team do what we do! Thank you!
Written By

writes at CleanTechnica, CSP-Today and Renewable Energy World.  She has also been published at Wind Energy Update, Solar Plaza, Earthtechling PV-Insider , and GreenProphet, Ecoseed, NRDC OnEarth, MatterNetwork, Celsius, EnergyNow, and Scientific American. As a former serial entrepreneur in product design, Susan brings an innovator's perspective on inventing a carbon-constrained civilization: If necessity is the mother of invention, solving climate change is the mother of all necessities! As a lover of history and sci-fi, she enjoys chronicling the strange future we are creating in these interesting times.    Follow Susan on Twitter @dotcommodity.


You May Also Like

Clean Power

We have a big special election coming up in Georgia in January, an election that will decide who represents Georgia in the US Senate....

Clean Power

Senator Joe Manchin isn't typically the most popular Democrat in the US Senate. He represents quite red West Virginia and can often be the...

Climate Change

I just offered 10 (unsolicited) suggestions for the Democratic Party, and here are 10 (unsolicited) suggestions for the Republican Party in a post-Trump world...

Clean Power

Four years of political conflict and division are coming to a closure — or, at least, transitioning. The Democratic Party just accomplished goal #1,...

Copyright © 2023 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.